Jump to content

Paul Hexem

Resident
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    4,551

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by Paul Hexem

  1. Paul Hexem
    No, only since I started cutting my own hair.
  2. Paul Hexem
    I say start a movement.
  3. Paul Hexem
    I said "sick of hearing it all the time", "it" being compliments, and mentioned I got one 15 years ago. Everything about that is a comment about how often- frequency. And no, because now it'd just be suspicious!
  4. Paul Hexem
    Context is irrelevant to what I was saying. I was just talking about the frequency at which men compliment women vs women complimenting men.
  5. Paul Hexem
  6. Paul Hexem
    Peeve: That women can complain they have to cringe and say thanks instead of delivering a feminist speech when they're complimented, because they're sick of hearing it all the time. I've been wearing the same style of watch for 15 years 'cause I remember that one time someone said nice watch.
  7. Paul Hexem
    This sort of thing always makes me think somebody is pandering. Be interesting to see if they rotate things out and see which communities they wind up highlighting over time.
  8. Paul Hexem
    I was making a comment about the word itself, since you both used it while quoting my post, that had nothing to do with gaslighting. Could adding some kind of "tethering distance" to auto-return be used for griefing? Sure, but no more than open rez/auto-return can be used for it already. Coming into the conversation worked up over griefing is an indicator that something else is going on, is all.
  9. Paul Hexem
    Was gonna make a joke, but then I realized I don't think she'd be upset at all if I called her a toy.
  10. Paul Hexem
    Speaking of words that have lost their meaning due to overuse. Perverse incentive is not "gaslighting".
  11. Paul Hexem
    Is it possible that all your issues with all kinds of griefing and harassment in SL is a result of perverse incentive? Like the Streisand Effect? Streisand effect - Wikipedia
  12. Paul Hexem
    Why would anyone even give to charity in SL? After transaction fees and typical skimming done by most of those organizations, anyone that actually needs the money would be getting a fraction of a fraction of a fraction of what you actually donated. Give someone in need 50 cents directly, they'll make more than if you donate $100 through SL.
  13. Paul Hexem
    Perfect opportunity to retell this one; 1. Those that can extrapolate from incomplete data.
  14. Paul Hexem
    Never.
  15. Paul Hexem
    Upscale luxury, no. Premium entertainment? Now that's a discussion to have. SL itself can be free, but the requirements to access is where the cost is.
  16. Paul Hexem
    Which still suggests that there's an overall savings going on and that the "but it's more expensive" claim is a lie.
  17. Paul Hexem
    I still think some lying went on there. LL's incompetent in a lot of ways, but I seriously doubt they'd look at something that works worse and is more expensive than what they were doing and say "That seems like a good idea, let's do that."
  18. Paul Hexem
    I used to have a friend and for the longest time I thought she had really lopsided boobs. Then one day she stuck a straw down there and I figured it out.
  19. Paul Hexem
    People that pay attention (especially asking questions) when you talk about something, even if they don't understand or aren't typically interested in whatever the topic is. That's a lost art.
  20. Paul Hexem
    I'll be at work, same as every other weekday in the year.
  21. Paul Hexem
    When I searched "love torpedo" and "lady cave" on the MP, the results were not what I expected.
  22. Paul Hexem
    Look around in a couple of the other sub forums. It's exactly what's going on.
  23. Paul Hexem
    So you changed the policy from a year ago due to declining business and bumped an old thread to try to get your name out there again?
  24. Paul Hexem
    No. That sounds insane.
  25. Paul Hexem
    It was asked which privacy standards are in place, and the answer was "sure, we got standards". On top of grammar mistakes and a lack of follow up to previous "surveys", it's not a good look.
×
×
  • Create New...