Jump to content

wife says sex in Second Life is porn?


Macy Wezzog
 Share

You are about to reply to a thread that has been inactive for 1205 days.

Please take a moment to consider if this thread is worth bumping.

Recommended Posts

6 minutes ago, Maryanne Solo said:

Just because you SL doesn't mean you HAVE to pixel.
But that's how the world views SL unfortunately. 😬🤫
And it's all 👉 YOUR 👈 fault! You sickos! 😵😂 

Easy to say when your name is Solo. But this Ava never did Pixel, and the OP should just have bought another computer and ask his wife to have a look at SL. Maybe she would like it. But is it not sex? My ava before this was a dancer, and got paid. For the people who paid SL is real I think. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, Macy Wezzog said:

My wife has caught me in RP having sex,tying females and she says that is porn and i'm cheating on her when do is she right?

Short answer - yes and yes.

Porn is a visual sexual medium, and SL is certainly visual. It doesn't make any difference that you're in control of one of the avatars.

Cheating is anything that your RL partner/spouse/SO thinks is cheating. If you don't think it's cheating, then she is at liberty to have sex in SL. But if she thinks it's cheating, then you are not.

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've rethought my novel idea and now think that reading a book can't be considered cheating. I know that people can cheat on their spouse simply by talking to another person romantically and it's this aspect of actual contact with another person which can be objectively used to say someone is cheating. Our original poster was actually interacting in a romantic manner with another person, hence, his wife's accusation of cheating is true. If he was at an AFK club then he would not be cheating.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/28/2020 at 2:03 PM, Ceka Cianci said:

Seriously though I  would blast the hell out of that bed, because I know for a fact I could never sleep in that it again..

If the time you caught them happened to be the last time, you'd have been sleeping perfectly fine in that bed after all the previous times! Why ruin a perfectly good bed? 

The mind can be a real b1tch sometimes can't it?  😉

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Dano Seale said:

If the time you caught them happened to be the last time, you'd have been sleeping perfectly fine in that bed after all the previous times! Why ruin a perfectly good bed? 

The mind can be a real b1tch sometimes can't it?  😉

 

I'm the one that washes the linens and makes the beds.. I'd pick up on her scent in a heart beat..

If he washed the linens, I'd pick up on that too, because he never does that.. hehehe

The whole scenario would never happen, because we have three boys, plus he wouldn't be dumb enough to bring her to our house..

My whole family lives on that road..

 

The whole scenario was based around someone saying, if bodily fluids were not exchanged then it wasn't cheating..Then me saying, if I seen my husbands pants around his ankles when i walked into the room and a girl on the bed, that i wouldn't matter if he was pulling them up or taking them down..

The reason I would shoot the hell out of the bed is because I would never sleep on it again and because, I'm gonna shooting the hell out of something..

But it won't happen because he's really not stupid ..hehehe

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, FairreLilette said:

Now you can spy on your SL spouse to find out if they are cheating with this nifty little gadget.

https://marketplace.secondlife.com/p/How-do-you-know-your-partner-is-cheating-Find-out-right-now/4175958

OMG - That is truly comical ---- 2500 L$ for a script to drop into something the person MIGHT wear.  Not to mention the fact that most folks cheating in SL are doing so with an alt account.

There's a sucker born every minute.

 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, LittleMe Jewell said:

OMG - That is truly comical ---- 2500 L$ for a script to drop into something the person MIGHT wear.  Not to mention the fact that most folks cheating in SL are doing so with an alt account.

There's a sucker born every minute.

 

wouldn't you have to have RLV enabled for that to work?  It sounds just like a function of RLV items that track where you are and who is talking in local around you.  I'm also fairly certain it can not receive IM messages so if they kept to IM, you wouldn't know a thing.  It's really a rather ridiculous item but yeah, some idiot will buy it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, FairreLilette said:

Now you can spy on your SL spouse to find out if they are cheating with this nifty little gadget.

https://marketplace.secondlife.com/p/How-do-you-know-your-partner-is-cheating-Find-out-right-now/4175958

The funny thing about the premise of that product is that it's against LL's TOS. You're not allowed to record chat unless all parties involved are aware of it.

7 minutes ago, RowanMinx said:

wouldn't you have to have RLV enabled for that to work?  It sounds just like a function of RLV items that track where you are and who is talking in local around you.  I'm also fairly certain it can not receive IM messages so if they kept to IM, you wouldn't know a thing.  It's really a rather ridiculous item but yeah, some idiot will buy it.

No, RLV is not at all required to track where someone is, who is around them, or what they are saying in public chat.

RLV, in fact, has nothing in it that helps with that. (And no, it cannot read IMs.)

Edited by Wulfie Reanimator
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Wulfie Reanimator said:

The funny thing about the premise of that product is that it's against LL's TOS. You're not allowed to record chat unless all parties involved are aware of it.

No, RLV is not at all required to track where someone is, who is around them, and what they are saying.

RLV, in fact, has nothing in it that helps with that. (And no, it cannot read IMs.)

It can hear what the wearer is saying in local chat but not who they are chatting with in local and teleport info.  I did say it could NOT read IM chat.  Local chat can be recorded and shared by anyone. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, RowanMinx said:

It can hear what the wearer is saying in local chat but not who they are chatting with in local and teleport info.  I did say it could NOT read IM chat.  Local chat can be recorded and shared by anyone. 

I was affirming that you were correct about RLV (or anything else) not being able to read IMs.

But there is no functionality in RLV that's related to reading any kind of chat, or any kind of spying. For that, all you need is regular LSL. You can track who's saying what, who's around who, where you're going, what you're doing, etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, RowanMinx said:

I beg to differ.  It can read the wearers local chat unless that has changed recently.

Please, show me. I must be blind or completely ignorant since in all my years of scripting I haven't seen or heard of such RLV feature.

http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/LSL_Protocol/RestrainedLoveAPI

You don't necessarily have to point me to the API either, just show me a product that supposedly does it through RLV. (As in, it shows up in the RLV console and does NOT work when I turn off RLV.)

Edited by Wulfie Reanimator
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Wulfie Reanimator said:

Please, show me. I must be blind or completely ignorant since in all my years I haven't seen or heard of such RLV feature.

http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/LSL_Protocol/RestrainedLoveAPI

I'm going to assume it's this one.  I've used it, I know it's a function of rlv collars.  Which particular function it is, I'm not sure.  It CAN be done, however.

Redirect public chat to private channels : "@redirchat:<channel_number>=<rem/add>"

Implemented in v1.16

When active, this restriction redirects whatever the user says on the public channel ("/0") to the private channel provided in the option field. If several redirections are issued, the chat message will be redirected to each channel. It does not apply to emotes, and will not trigger any animation (typing start, typing stop, nodding) when talking. This restriction does not supercede @sendchannel. NOTE: As of RLV v1.22.1 / RLVa 1.1.0, it had a bug that @redirchat also truncates emotes on channel 0. An additional @emote=add works around this side-effect. This bug was fixed in the Cool VL Viewer starting with v1.22g (but Marine's RLV v1.23 still had this bug) and RLV v2.0 (it is safe to assume it was fixed in all viewers starting with v1.24 and v2.0).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If I'm wearing a collar, the owner can set whatever it is to be able to hear local chat wherever I am.  It's a function as I said, although if it still IS, I'm not sure since I don't wear one at this time.

The Spy function?  I'd have to get online and wear one to let you know with certainty which function it is and how to enable it.

Edited by RowanMinx
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, RowanMinx said:

If I'm wearing a collar, the owner can set whatever it is to be able to hear local chat wherever I am.  It's a function as I said, although if it still IS, I'm not sure since I don't wear one at this time.

Is that why Discord became so popular?  lol  Can it hear Discord chat too?  

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Love Zhaoying said:

Can you imagine a master so bored, that they would listen to their slave's chat?

I never really allowed it.  We just tested it out once to see how it worked.  It does seem like a function for the insecure and bored.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You are about to reply to a thread that has been inactive for 1205 days.

Please take a moment to consider if this thread is worth bumping.

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...