All Activity

Mmhm. Maybe you should post that picture in this thread and see what others think.

she is 100% 18

Since I just visited someone recovering from Gillain Barre - serious literal paralysis as a result of vaccination, I understand what you've written more than most will. Thank you for sharing. As to Arielle's comment, I honestly think there are people who feel justified in whatever they say without repercussions; echoed in your example of Piers Morgan. Thanks again!

i dont think that the pic i took of my avi anyways says that im not and adult .... cuse hell if any kid avitart tryed to wear this would be grounder for life and if say my rl children treyed to ware somthign like this or show that much skin or what not i would also ground them for life ... but yeah every thing is up to the people that own the game .. but my statement is only that shouldnt be lables as a child and not beable to do adult things if ur in the abdl comnuity or the daddy dom baby girl comunity and wanted to see if that someone could say that it is allowed cuse there are thounds of us in this comunity that is trying to get this answerrd and feel that what we wear or what we do as adults ... sholdnt be tailered to what is conciderd as kid like using the how goveerment was trying to bann fruity vapes cuse they thought it intises kids to do it ... no cuse it has alwasy been forever an adult accitviey and hell we as adults now over 21 like fruity stuff 2

Paraphilic infantilism is a form of ***** (AP). Meaning your RPing a form of age regression. If that were to include, and you did mention it did, sexual play, that could get you an AR. Personally, for what it's worth, your avatar does not look 18.

If your av looks convincingly like an adult, yes. I'm not sure that most people would say that photo looks convincingly, though, so you'd probably draw a few ARs. The Governance would have to decide. Just my guess. Aside from that, of course, an individual land owner can still eject you from a region no matter what the TOS says, regardless of what your av looks like. That hasn't changed in the updated TOS.

so my adult avitar as along as i am prosenting as such adult ..... even if the rp is mentaly not phycialy as a adult baby can still walk around in my diaper and paci without it breaking tos https://gyazo.com/be780fb8ec0faa6eb6b74dfe4bcf85d2

Regardless of what your RP is, if it was considered OK with respect to TOS previously, and your avis are all presenting as 18+ avatars, you can carry on as before, IMHO.

I'm going to have to be extremely careful how I respond to this ... but I'll do it with an RL example which, hopefully, won't trigger any moderation. Consider, if you will, Piers Morgan. In 2021 Piers Morgan tweeted that "Those who refuse to be vaccinated, with no medical reason not to, should be refused NHS care ..." He reiterated that view a number of times, and made it very clear what he meant. It wasn't a single tweet which might be misinterpreted ... it was clear and unambiguous what he was saying. I am aware that (to some extent) Morgan has reversed himself. TOO LATE. Some damage is unforgivable and a man with his audience making that statement and reinforcing it multiple times means there is NO forgiveness. I am NOT a Christian and no part of my moral code says that I need to cut him any slack whatsoever. (As an aside ... I'm picking Morgan as an example because he's pretty well known across the west, but there are plenty of local 'celebrities' I could have used ... it's just that many of you wouldn't know who I was talking about) That 'no jab, no treatment' attitude was echoed in many forums on the 'net ... including this one. There were actually people who called for the use of force to make people be vaccinated. I was present in-world when one such individual expressed that very opinion. Said person was immediately blocked and derezzed and no longer exists in my world. Why do I have such strong opinions on this? Consider my RL partner, who has a number of medical conditions. My partner's three specialists (all among the best in their fields) recommended strenuously against vaccination. The pencil necked politically motivated 'medical authorities' here in Australia denied my partner a vaccination exemption in the face of the written opinions of those three specialists. By every official metric my partner refused to be vaccinated without a medical reason. There were public release announcement by so called medical professionals here in Australia saying that my partner should be lowest on the priority list for treatment because my partner didn't have that magic piece of paper that the bureaucrats refused to issue. For anyone who is curious ... the evidence is in now and it is evident that my partner was very wise in refusing to be vaccinated. My partner's specialists were entirely correct and the bureaucrats were absolutely wrong. As a result ... I ignore Piers Morgan and anything and everything he says. I have blocked anyone who echoed that opinion on every forum I participate on. For everyone there is a line, and once someone crosses it, blocking/ignoring is not only justified, it is actually the kindest thing I can do ... the alternatives are unpleasant. Because of the contentious nature of my example I will not engage in conversation about covid, vaccination, etc. I simply used it as an example because it was one of the clearest cut examples I had available of a 'line in the sand' that justifies blocking and ignoring, and it's one of the reasons my ignore list is as long as it is. Whether or not this post survives moderation is up to someone else ... I've got some RL to attend to so later all.

Why, oh why do I keep volunteering for too many things? But at least I have Millie to help with spreadsheets:

From Chatgpot (apologies for feeding the post into the AI) The post emphasizes that it's not targeting any specific individual or issue but rather addressing an overarching problem in Second Life culture and design. It discusses the issues of avatar height, proportions, and scaling, highlighting that the prevailing norm tends towards larger avatars and objects. The writer suggests that this bias could lead to discrimination and bullying against those who prefer more realistic proportions. The author calls for greater education and understanding among Second Life residents to foster respect for diverse avatar styles and preferences. They advocate for a culture where everyone can express themselves without fear of judgment or harassment. Overall, the message urges for mutual respect, acceptance, and enjoyment of Second Life experiences.

The Truth Behind Adult Babies and Diaper Lovers In a world that is rich in diversity, understanding various ways of life and forms of personal expression can be an enlightening journey. Do you know what ABDL means? If not, we're here to shed light on it. ABDL is an acronym that stands for "Adult Baby Diaper Lover." This term characterizes a unique community of individuals who engage in adult role-playing, specifically with elements of paraphilic infantilism and diaper love. This may sound unfamiliar, but people around the globe are a part of this community, finding comfort and contentment in the ABDL lifestyle. Understanding the world of ABDL can be daunting. That's where we, Tykables are here to help. We're a brand invested in enhancing the ABDL experience by providing high-quality adult diapers, adult baby onesie-style clothing, and a range of other related items. Boasting years of expertise in this field, we understand the importance of security, comfort, and – above all – respect for personal lifestyles. Consequently, our commitment to eliminating stigma and promoting acceptance drives all that we do. Let's dive in and explore the intriguing world of Adult Baby Diaper Lovers, taking an empathetic and respectful view on the topic that ensures everyone's feelings and life choices are valued. this is a incert of those who do this in real life and how we work ect if that helps at all

I have a question that needs to be clarified SOOO ... does the comment about Avis and tos and all that mean that the ddlg abdl community is included in it as well ok so for those who don't know abdl is a coping mechanism in that a lot of people use and also fun with Daddy Doms as baby girls all Adults that wear and Participate. in both sexual and none sexual activities but also have part of it being diapers and bottles and pacis ect that are in the mp labbled for adult use only like snuggles and puddlepants and stuff like that the creators have specialty stated it is for an adult avi and make it for adult furry and human avis are wer grouped in to this saying we cant wear diapers or walk around with pacis and such if someone that can answer this would be great not to mention that most of the sims that have this we acutivly keep kid and twen avis off it if anyone looks like they playing a kid or tween there are instently banned form the sim .... and even in the rl comuity we keep minors out of it

Yes it is ok, because an alpha layer does not hide the modesty layer so that you can see the nude skin underneath. It hides all the layers. It's also why they say that the modesty layer cannot be the same tone as the skin.. They are concerned about nudity in those areas. The part mentioned about transparency with the modesty layer was making sure that it is not where you can see through it like you could with say something like, sheer clothing.. They want those areas hidden.. An alpha cut or layer will hide those areas still because they hide all the layers at the same time. That part of the guidelines is written for those creating the bodies and the skins.. They mention transparency twice in the guide lines and both times those lines are to content creators. Residents presenting as Child Avatars shall be prohibited from the following: Being fully nude. Child avatar content creators are required to add a modesty layer which is baked into child avatar skins or bodies, is not transparent, does not match the skin tone, and may not be removed. Content for Child Avatars being sold inworld and/or on Marketplace must comply with the General Content Rating and adhere to the following: Child avatar content creators are required to add a modesty layer which is baked into child avatar skins or bodies, is not transparent, does not match the skin tone, and may not be removed.

/me smiles...It WAS actually kinky...

The following exchange from yesterday's Governance Office Hours might reassure you

LOL! Thought you meant I should have guessed. But the years of being a "cat person" are far, far behind me.

Oh, I just meant the ears on the avatar are pretty much spot on size wise. At first glance, I thought Bat ears.

Well yes, of course - but MOST cats don't have that type of ears vs. face. 🙂 I happened to study cat breeds when I was younger, I had many, many books on them! And etc. But anyway, the Sphinx wasn't so popular or common then as it is now (in various TikTok videos even, etc.). That's my excuse, and I'm sticking with it!

I really like that avatar. You did a great job with it.

Would like to be a part of something big? Would you like to bring more traffic to your land and advertise to a larger audience? Well Premier Wrestling has just the thing for you. Contact SarahAdam Resident in Second Life or Discord Sarahadam

OH please.

It would be more advantageous to just wear BOM undies if you're concerned about griefers. But as others have mentioned, I'm sure governance is able to investigate to show you were not at fault. Plus you would be automatically restricting access to possibly some really good and innocent customers by switching to the adult designation.