Kyrah Abattoir

What you gave them really.

What's a schmeckle ?

Good collisions on a large concave structure for only 1LI isn't a reasonable expectation.

Who would have known that in 2019 making alpha masks falls into the spectrum of "months of work".

First thing first, why are you uploading multiple objects at the same time? To me, it looks like they are getting assigned the wrong lod.

would most likely require some kind of bot yeah.

Now and then someone complains that my doorframes are too small... Chuckles

If you're not going to teach your kids how to behave in society, society will.

The simplified model is almost always inadequate and trash. I kinda wish they would just remove that feature from the uploader as it never produces good results.

Oh that's a good idea!

Well you learn something everyday Specifically PRIM_SCRIPTED_SIT_ONLY is fairly new for me.

If the texture is monochrome, that lipstick could also just be mod so you can color it any shade you want.

Yes but then anyone can sit on it, included avatars "not" next to it. The experience method gets around that by having the chair sits you and preventing people from sitting manually

The issue with this method is that the chair is accessible to anyone, not just the avatar next to it.

As far as the lsl side is concerned, llSleep does block the thread for that specific script, in general no other event can fire until the current event has exited.

Why should they? people also condition access to the experience location to granting all the permissions required for the experience to run. Should you be granted entry if you have an outdated set of permissions granted to the experience? The only way i'd see this work is as a general experience-wide checkbox list that the experience owner can change, and requiring more permissions automatically kicks out all participants that have not granted that permission to the experience already, when they hit 'save', or alternatively, offer them to either accept the new requirements or leave the experience. The experience 'foo' has been updated and requires new permissions: accept/leave experience

Yeah, they aren't exactly hard but I prefer writing my own code, but that would have required a protocol spec from omega, or me reverse engineering it, which I couldn't be bothered to try.

Figured i'd post this little tip here. But you can use the experience permission system to create experience chairs/beds/sittable that don't actually allow people to sit from across the room. Using llSitOnLink() you can obviously do all your checks before the object sits the user (you'll need a menu to confirm obviously otherwise it's a little rude) but by setting the primite parameter PRIM_SCRIPTED_SIT_ONLY to true, you can ensure that avatars cannot actually sit on that object all by themselves. Things I've made with this so far: Respawn points. Chairs that only work if you are next to them. Animated mini-cutscenes (squeezing through a crack in a wall, crawling under a blast door, or through a vent). What other fun uses have you found for those functions?

Yeah those usually give me a chuckle when i'm surrounded by 200K+ avatars.

I didn't mean to sound rude earlier, but the way I'm seeing it is that if you somehow manage to "bar" them from overspending in SL, it's just like considering that when the symptom disappears, the illness is cured. They might just get mad at you in the end and find another outlet to overspend. Again, it's hard to judge with only one side of the story, for us here, but even for you.

And then what happens the day you decide to use that permission you didn't use before? When someone in the experience who did not grant that permission tries to use a script that requires it? Do they get an accept popup? What if they refuse? Do they get to stay in the experience or do they get kicked out? Experience permissions are granted/revoked in a few clicks and at any time, unlike regular permissions, they are safer that regular permissions if anything.

Are you sure you're not wearing two bodies on accident? It looks like skin on skin around the chest area, to me.

I understand your concerns, but if they are a legal adult and considered lucid under the law, there isn't much you can do. It's also difficult to make a judgement with only one side of the story. As for my original message, my assumption is that if this is a general trait of them which extends to their real life in general, stopping them in SL will only serve to annoy them and not actually change anything. You can always try to reason with them, or with someone they might listen to, but it's their life.

What makes you think this is limited to their SecondLife?

In my ~15 years in SL i've met maybe a dozen avatars that could unambiguously be considered children. This is not something where you ponder on for 10 minutes, you will know, the second you see them. If you are hesitating, you are probably casting a stylistic judgement. It is also not ground for banning or an abuse report either, unless sexual behavior is involved. Newsflash: Most Residents who choose to play as a child have no interest in adult content, they just want to re-live their childhood/create a better one.