Starberry Passion Posted May 3 Share Posted May 3 2 minutes ago, Lita Jannings said: do you have a Link or Direct message me inworld for these devices. think I have the purple one but not the other 3. https://marketplace.secondlife.com/p/OO-Avatar-Ruler-precise-height-detector/2769845 https://marketplace.secondlife.com/p/Avatar-Height-Scale/1789002 the other two I got for free inworld i'd have to give you a copy of them Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Madi Melodious Posted May 3 Share Posted May 3 6 minutes ago, Lysana McMillan said: And inaccurate. Kemono can have larger breasts. The same way with AVIL. The body can be used as a adult shape. I'm moding my shape and look to fit with the new rules. Going for around 20 or 21 years old. 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zalificent Corvinus Posted May 3 Share Posted May 3 4 minutes ago, Starberry Passion said: The first one height has me as (far left) [15:28] Exact Height/SL Viewer Apperance Mode: Starberry Passion is 1.681180 m (5 ft. 6in.) tall. (counting shoes) - Prim Height The second, second one, the red and white ruler has me as [15:29] [OO] Avatar ruler 1.4: Starberry Passion, your avatar's height is 160 cm (5' 3") counting your shoes. The third one is a height and script checker, this one is the one that takes a lot off of the avatar. [15:30] height and script checker V2.1: < Starɓɛrrɣ Ɖɔllƒiɛ > (includes shoes) - i don't use shoe height- [15:30] height and script checker V2.1: Height in Shape Editor: 1.40 m (4 feet 7 inches) the forth one I am 170cms which is 5'5" Scripted height checkers use an LSL command that pull down information about an avatars collision capsule, not the actual prim height of the avatar. Problem is that "height only goes to the center of your head, thats why the red and white fossil is about 3 inches shorter than the others. There is also some space under the capsule, that has to be added, FS eventually got around to doing that, the official fail-viewer might have by now, but I wouldn't bet on it, it's only been about 10 years. The third ne is a broken piece of badly coded ancient drek, ditch it. The first one probably uses some of Henri's code, since it's open source. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wincil Posted May 3 Share Posted May 3 (edited) What new rules exactly? sorry Was a little confused when someone said that. Edited May 3 by Wincil 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vivienne Schell Posted May 3 Share Posted May 3 1 minute ago, Zalificent Corvinus said: Scripted height checkers use an LSL command that pull down information about an avatars collision capsule, not the actual prim height of the avatar. Problem is that "height only goes to the center of your head, thats why the red and white fossil is about 3 inches shorter than the others. There is also some space under the capsule, that has to be added, FS eventually got around to doing that, the official fail-viewer might have by now, but I wouldn't bet on it, it's only been about 10 years. The third ne is a broken piece of badly coded ancient drek, ditch it. The first one probably uses some of Henri's code, since it's open source. Rezz a prim, make it phantom and 50 percent transparent, scale it on the z axis until it matches the body height and one gets the exact height (in meters). I don´t get what the problem with heigth should be, anyway. A 50 cm tall fully breast/bottom loaded kupra with a lascive smile on it´s balloon lips certainly isn´t a child avatar. 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zalificent Corvinus Posted May 3 Share Posted May 3 3 minutes ago, Wincil said: What new rules exactly? The new "child-like avatars cannot be on Adult rated land ever, cannot be naked ever, cannot have genitals ever etc." rules. The ones people have been talking about for FIFTY SIX PAGES now. Remember? 4 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JUSTUS Palianta Posted May 3 Share Posted May 3 5 minutes ago, Wincil said: What new rules exactly? sorry Was a little confused when someone said that. Try reading page one of the thread? 5 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wincil Posted May 3 Share Posted May 3 3 minutes ago, Zalificent Corvinus said: The new "child-like avatars cannot be on Adult rated land ever, cannot be naked ever, cannot have genitals ever etc." rules. The ones people have been talking about for FIFTY SIX PAGES now. Remember? Well it can be hard to define what a child avatar is btw child like can mean anything. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zalificent Corvinus Posted May 3 Share Posted May 3 1 minute ago, Vivienne Schell said: I don´t get what the problem with heigth should be, anyway The "problem" is the ones who are p*ssed off they they can't go to adult destinations anymore or be naked, are claiming that "all females under 7 ft tall will be banned" and "height varies depending what units you measure in" and a load of other nonsense. The funniest nonsense is claiming a child like avatar isn't child like if it 5'4" tall, as if there were some "official adult height" which there isn't. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LittleMe Jewell Posted May 3 Share Posted May 3 (edited) 11 minutes ago, Wincil said: What new rules exactly? sorry Was a little confused when someone said that. You have been participating in this thread for almost 24 hours now and you don't know what it is about? The TITLE of the Thread even says "what changed in the terms of service" Anyway: LL Blog post: https://community.secondlife.com/blogs/entry/15531-enhancing-our-world-together-important-updates-for-the-second-life-community/ Policy link: https://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/Linden_Lab_Official:Clarification_of_policy_disallowing_ageplay?_gl=1*hvi5fx*_ga*MTg2MjU1MTg2Ni4xNzAzMTE1NzMw*_ga_T7G7P6DCEC*MTcxNDc3Mzg3MS40NTAuMS4xNzE0Nzc2OTcyLjAuMC4xNzA0NTczNDc3*_fplc*bWVkSlE0SzA2eGlpNEJxQlpFeGlacDE5eDBIN2EyJTJGejhJaFlHc0FTWUhwQ05NUWRWNnVpZEhDcExyN2dISHJrWjFFZDFXdG8xN3EyNlF1VHJXMmpDd0ZTN0dKd2JpdU1Ua0NaUHI2YVhXZVdLS3J3SkpFOXolMkJwVzYycFJVZyUzRCUzRA.. Edited May 3 by LittleMe Jewell 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rowan Amore Posted May 3 Share Posted May 3 Just now, Wincil said: Well it can be hard to define what a child avatar is btw child like can mean anything. If your avatar in SL looks like your forum picture, that is child-like to most adult region owners. How LL will see it? Who knows. Enter adult at your own risk. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wincil Posted May 3 Share Posted May 3 Well it's not linden labs intent to banish childlike avatars in and of themselves. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zalificent Corvinus Posted May 3 Share Posted May 3 Just now, Wincil said: Well it can be hard to define what a child avatar is btw child like can mean anything. No, it can't we're not talking about Child-like = cute or Child like = innocent or Child-like = nice In LL's revised ToS, "child like" has one vague meaning. Child-Like = Looks like a child. 5 2 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kathlen Onyx Posted May 3 Share Posted May 3 3 minutes ago, Wincil said: Well it can be hard to define what a child avatar is btw child like can mean anything. Oh geez, I know you've been reading this thread since the beginning because you've posted in it! 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vivienne Schell Posted May 3 Share Posted May 3 Just now, Zalificent Corvinus said: The "problem" is the ones who are p*ssed off they they can't go to adult destinations anymore or be naked, are claiming that "all females under 7 ft tall will be banned" and "height varies depending what units you measure in" and a load of other nonsense. The funniest nonsense is claiming a child like avatar isn't child like if it 5'4" tall, as if there were some "official adult height" which there isn't. Yeah. My latest experience with one of them was: She got caught on a posbeball containing adult anims and perfermed some more or less explicit actions with a pony there (moderate sim). I adressed her and asked her for showing at least some kind of conciousness regarding the problems running a child avi in SL. The answer was "I am a child, how can you expect that?" 1 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zalificent Corvinus Posted May 3 Share Posted May 3 1 minute ago, Wincil said: Well it's not linden labs intent to banish childlike avatars in and of themselves. They HAVE banished them from all Adult Rated Land. enter an A rated parcel looking like a child, and you are breaking the ToS, and have become an official SL Criminal 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coffee Pancake Posted May 3 Share Posted May 3 1 minute ago, Zalificent Corvinus said: Child-Like = Looks like a child. You look like a child. Change my mind. 1 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wincil Posted May 3 Share Posted May 3 (edited) 2 minutes ago, Zalificent Corvinus said: No, it can't we're not talking about Child-like = cute or Child like = innocent or Child-like = nice In LL's revised ToS, "child like" has one vague meaning. Child-Like = Looks like a child. childlike = looks like a child? that seems kinda vague ngl. Edited May 3 by Wincil Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Starberry Passion Posted May 3 Share Posted May 3 Height isn't a problem, according to Linden. It's only a problem to some people who dislike shorter. Being short does not get you banned from Second Life or adult sims, the owner can Ban you for being short but being short alone is not grounds for termination. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LittleMe Jewell Posted May 3 Share Posted May 3 5 minutes ago, Wincil said: Well it can be hard to define what a child avatar is btw child like can mean anything. Yes and LL has said that it can be difficult defining a 'child' in some cases. Based on your forum picture, I'd call you a child and if you TP'd to an Adult region that I owned, I'd send you out and ban you. 6 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ineffable Mote Posted May 3 Share Posted May 3 Bad faith begets bad faith, and not much else. 2 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wincil Posted May 3 Share Posted May 3 5 minutes ago, Rowan Amore said: If your avatar in SL looks like your forum picture, that is child-like to most adult region owners. How LL will see it? Who knows. Enter adult at your own risk. What are you even on about *facepalms* Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kei Niosaki Posted May 3 Share Posted May 3 On 5/2/2024 at 4:30 PM, Madi Melodious said: How about when I wearing nothing there? Do I still need this modesty layer if there is nothing there? I mean the complete lack of private parts, not just alphaed out. If nothing is there an if your mesh clothes are derendered an still nothing is down there then nothing to report you for as there is is no proof if your skin or body has a modestly layer an if anyone does have proof to report it they are using using Illegal tools to see that. I use a child avi and i refuse to update my skin over something this ridiculous ,, ill continue to just use Bom underwear an alphas like i always do as my modestly layer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LittleMe Jewell Posted May 3 Share Posted May 3 4 minutes ago, Wincil said: Well it's not linden labs intent to banish childlike avatars in and of themselves. 3 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wincil Posted May 3 Share Posted May 3 2 minutes ago, LittleMe Jewell said: Yes and LL has said that it can be difficult defining a 'child' in some cases. Based on your forum picture, I'd call you a child and if you TP'd to an Adult region that I owned, I'd send you out and ban you. You don't even know what my avatar even looks like in world. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Facebook
Instagram
Twitter
YouTube
Flickr
Recommended Posts