Vivienne Schell

Worked pretty well for Microsoft, didn´t it?

God no, imagine some toddler talking like a granny. Eeeeep....

Creep show.

Why? If someone thinks that a walking plywood box is a "Child Avi" the someone has the right to think so. The someone can even AR the plywood box. And as sim owner, eject, ban and mute the plywood box and leave the rest up to governance. Totally useless thread.

Scotty failed to beam him up.

I have evidence that some Linden stalked my ex lover cause the friend of my ex lover told me so.

Arielle could hit Linden HQ and grief Obwerwolf by throwing some worn modesty panels at him, or something, then wait for the warning....or the permaban. Only way to convince her, i fear.

I do not see more than a handful individuals who do neither get an idea on the reasons for the changes nor understand the content of the ToS.

Content for Child Avatars being sold inworld and/or on Marketplace must comply with the General Content Rating and adhere to the following: Content intended for Child Avatars must be listed as General maturity. Content intended for Child Avatars must not be sexual and/or suggestive in nature. No Adult or Moderate keywords in Marketplace listings on Child avatar content. Child avatar content creators are required to add a modesty layer which is baked into child avatar skins or bodies, is not transparent, does not match the skin tone, and may not be removed.

Maybe he does not even exist.We will never know. To be or not to be. What a drama.

Every skin can be removed from every body. But once it is replaced by a skin without the panels. Kaboom. ToS violation. As I mentioned somewhere before, the panel solution is the most simple and effective one for LL for several reasons, and that´s why they go for it.

Linden Lab never tells the one they adress with warnings or even bans who exactly AR´d them. /me coughs

Why would dirty old men get child avis banned? That is contradicting the interests of dirty old men.

Did she?

So far the ban notificaton LL sent to that guy is a hidden document. /me coughs.

I think that they know that very well. And i strongly doubt that they will even think of changing the principkle of baked on skin modesty panels, because this is the simplification they need and want. And not some underwear fashion guides over 50 pages wher they must define what goes and what does not go.

Not necessarily. If it stays as it is, people who use (for example) not specificaly "designed for kids" bodies are still required to use these panels, but will rely on the goodwill of the skin creators. And if none of these will release a "paneled" skin... Because, read in context: Child avatars are required to add a modesty layer which is baked into child avatar skins or bodies, is not transparent, does not match the skin tone, and may not be removed where the focal point of the body is on the breasts, pelvis, or buttocks That´s how Interprete this. And that may or may not cause problems. If the skin creators don´t uupdate the Child Avi Player will be forced to use a specifically "designed for kids" Avi.

Syntax and Context. Child avatar content creators are required to add a modesty layer which is baked into child avatar skins or bodies, is not transparent, does not match the skin tone, and may not be removed. The following sentence makes absolutely no sense without being set into context with the one before Child avatars where the focal point of the body is on the breasts, pelvis, or buttocks That´s pretty clear. BUT. I pointed at that before in another post and no one grabbed it: What is a "Child Avatar Content Creator"? Maitreya certainly isn´t one, for example.

What kind of underwear? Do you expect Linden Lab to add a fashion guide on undies? Like "string must be like that", "no holes", "transparency must be 40 % at least", "no thongs which expose this and that".....and so on and so on. Can of worms.

Gee, Madsi, you still do not get or do not want to get the reason for all this. I really am tired of explaining that to you all over again. Maybe one explaination: Private Sims with Ban lines cannot be visited by nosey people who take screenshots and take logs and recordings. Public places are different. OK?

If it would not be that it would be something else. Language never can be 100 percent bulletproof. See "militia" in the American constitution.

.nostrip

In theory. The theory is dust once that child Avi is rich enough to pay for an own parcel where it can change, knows how to erect privacy and ban lines and/or an instantly kicking security orb. Hehe.

There will be no trouble like that if you follow the new ToS.