Kelli May Posted March 18, 2016 Share Posted March 18, 2016 " steph Arnott wrote: "Some men have breasts." unless they are capable of producing milk then they are not mammory glands. Ever thought of learning biology? A few relevant definitions on the subject (my bold): Breast: either of the pair of mammary glands extending from the front of the chest in pubescent and adult human females and some other mammals; also : either of the analogous but rudimentary organs of the male chest especially when enlarged Both females and males develop breasts from the same embryological tissues. Gynecomastia is a common disorder of the endocrine system in which there is a non-cancerous increase in the size of male breast tissue. Ever thought of not making unsubstantiated statements? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steph Arnott Posted March 18, 2016 Share Posted March 18, 2016 "Unless you are an Indonesian fruit bat, though, it probably won't happen naturally" thats the first one The other two are a hormone inbalance. Hardly evidence. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DejaHo Posted March 19, 2016 Share Posted March 19, 2016 Madelaine McMasters wrote: steph Arnott wrote: "Some men have breasts." unless they are capable of producing milk then they are not mammory glands. Ever thought of learning biology? The hardware ain't what it used to be in guys, but it is there: http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/strange-but-true-males-can-lactate/ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Male_lactation http://www.mentalfloss.com/article/61894/can-men-lactate Move two of my first line's spaces one to the left and you've got a pair. ;-). Once again you post of the absolute emasculation of men. Madelaines' forum! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phil Deakins Posted March 19, 2016 Share Posted March 19, 2016 steph Arnott wrote: "Some men have breasts." unless they are capable of producing milk then they are not mammory glands. Ever thought of learning biology? Why do you do it, Steph? Why do you keep on piling into things just to be objectionable? You're usually wrong when you do it, as you are in this case. Nobody said that men have mammory glands, so why even mention it? And why follow it up with smart-ass question - which rebounded on you because it's you who didn't study enough biology, as people have now shown you. But why do you do it in the first place? Are you so angry with life that you feel compelled to do it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Theresa Tennyson Posted March 19, 2016 Share Posted March 19, 2016 steph Arnott wrote: "Some men have breasts." unless they are capable of producing milk then they are not mammory glands. Ever thought of learning biology? We've already determined that under the right hormonal conditions a man's breasts can produce milk. Now take into account that at any given time the majority of women have breasts that don't actively produce milk because they aren't going through the hormone cycle that typically starts with having a baby. Indeed, learning biology may be a good thought at that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Conall DeCuir Posted March 19, 2016 Share Posted March 19, 2016 Good ! Then we are finally gone from female breasts being seen as something erotic and just as something practical in the case they lactate and as a man can do so also, it is alright to have the girls walking around topless in the future. Nipples and breasts became genderless. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Perrie Juran Posted March 19, 2016 Share Posted March 19, 2016 Conall DeCuir wrote: Good ! Then we are finally gone from female breasts being seen as something erotic and just as something practical in the case they lactate and as a man can do so also, it is alright to have the girls walking around topless in the future. Nipples and breasts became genderless. What's impractical about breasts being erotic? While that may not be their primary function it still is a function. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Madelaine McMasters Posted March 19, 2016 Share Posted March 19, 2016 steph Arnott wrote: "Unless you are an Indonesian fruit bat, though, it probably won't happen naturally" thats the first one The other two are a hormone inbalance. Hardly evidence. That hormone imbalance occurs naturally, if infrequently. It can also be induced, often unintentionally. Hormones do not create the mammary structures, they affect them and their development. Even "fully male" males have those structures, underdeveloped and dormant, but there. Environmental conditions can effect hormonal imbalance during development. The use of chlorine to make industrial organic chemicals has led to the unintended side effect of lacing our enviroment with xenoestrogenic compounds. Those compounds can have deleterious effects on humans, including retarding male and accelerating female development. While many cultures stick only male and female tags on people, Mother Nature does not observe our cultures. Because she never learned to copy perfectly, she churns out every conceivable mix of physical bits and self images, with widely varying probability. Those born without a socially acceptable mix are often cast off to the edges of society or worse. We like things to be simple, to be black or white. That doesn't make them so. How many examples of non gender conforming humans would be required to get past being "hardly evidence"? The problem with nipples isn't in their biology, it's in our culture. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rhonda Huntress Posted March 19, 2016 Author Share Posted March 19, 2016 Perrie Juran wrote: What's impractical about breasts being erotic? While that may not be their primary function it still is a function. So, breats are erotic. Shouldn't we keep them covered up in public then? Madelaine McMasters wrote: While many cultures stick only male and female tags on people, Mother Nature does not observe our cultures. Because she never learned to copy perfectly, she churns out every conceivable mix of physical bits and self images, with widely varying probability. Those born without a socially acceptable mix are often cast off to the edges of society or worse. We like things to be simple, to be black or white. That doesn't make them so. How many examples of non gender conforming humans would be required to get past being "hardly evidence"? The problem with nipples isn't in their biology, it's in our culture. You know, we all start off as female, then some diviate to various degrees. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Perrie Juran Posted March 19, 2016 Share Posted March 19, 2016 Rhonda Huntress wrote: Perrie Juran wrote: What's impractical about breasts being erotic? While that may not be their primary function it still is a function. So, breats are erotic. Shouldn't we keep them covered up in public then? Madelaine McMasters wrote: While many cultures stick only male and female tags on people, Mother Nature does not observe our cultures. Because she never learned to copy perfectly, she churns out every conceivable mix of physical bits and self images, with widely varying probability. Those born without a socially acceptable mix are often cast off to the edges of society or worse. We like things to be simple, to be black or white. That doesn't make them so. How many examples of non gender conforming humans would be required to get past being "hardly evidence"? The problem with nipples isn't in their biology, it's in our culture. You know, we all start off as female, then some diviate to various degrees. Yeah, I guess I'm deviant. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phil Deakins Posted March 19, 2016 Share Posted March 19, 2016 Rhonda Huntress wrote: So, breats are erotic. Shouldn't we keep them covered up in public then? You'd better get over to my place so I can exmaine them and tell you whether or not you should keep them covered up in public. Keeping them just for me might be safer option. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Conall DeCuir Posted March 19, 2016 Share Posted March 19, 2016 Should you need a 2nd opinion, i am open to voice mine .. just call me ! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dillon Levenque Posted March 20, 2016 Share Posted March 20, 2016 Madelaine McMasters wrote: steph Arnott wrote: "Unless you are an Indonesian fruit bat, though, it probably won't happen naturally" thats the first one The other two are a hormone inbalance. Hardly evidence. That hormone imbalance occurs naturally, if infrequently. It can also be induced, often unintentionally. Hormones do not create the mammary structures, they affect them and their development. Even "fully male" males have those structures, underdeveloped and dormant, but there. Environmental conditions can effect hormonal imbalance during development. The use of chlorine to make industrial organic chemicals has led to the unintended side effect of lacing our enviroment with xenoestrogenic compounds. Those compounds can have deleterious effects on humans, including retarding male and accelerating female development. While many cultures stick only male and female tags on people, Mother Nature does not observe our cultures. Because she never learned to copy perfectly, she churns out every conceivable mix of physical bits and self images, with widely varying probability. Those born without a socially acceptable mix are often cast off to the edges of society or worse. We like things to be simple, to be black or white. That doesn't make them so. How many examples of non gender conforming humans would be required to get past being "hardly evidence"? The problem with nipples isn't in their biology, it's in our culture. You have, as has been shown many times, way more patience with people on this forum than I do. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dillon Levenque Posted March 20, 2016 Share Posted March 20, 2016 Perrie Juran wrote: Rhonda Huntress wrote: You know, we all start off as female, then some diviate to various degrees. Yeah, I guess I'm deviant. You GUESS? You're a Martian, of course you're deviant! It's in whatever passes for genes on the Angry Red Planet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snugs McMasters Posted March 20, 2016 Share Posted March 20, 2016 Dillon Levenque wrote: Madelaine McMasters wrote: steph Arnott wrote: "Unless you are an Indonesian fruit bat, though, it probably won't happen naturally" thats the first one The other two are a hormone inbalance. Hardly evidence. That hormone imbalance occurs naturally, if infrequently. It can also be induced, often unintentionally. Hormones do not create the mammary structures, they affect them and their development. Even "fully male" males have those structures, underdeveloped and dormant, but there. Environmental conditions can effect hormonal imbalance during development. The use of chlorine to make industrial organic chemicals has led to the unintended side effect of lacing our enviroment with xenoestrogenic compounds. Those compounds can have deleterious effects on humans, including retarding male and accelerating female development. While many cultures stick only male and female tags on people, Mother Nature does not observe our cultures. Because she never learned to copy perfectly, she churns out every conceivable mix of physical bits and self images, with widely varying probability. Those born without a socially acceptable mix are often cast off to the edges of society or worse. We like things to be simple, to be black or white. That doesn't make them so. How many examples of non gender conforming humans would be required to get past being "hardly evidence"? The problem with nipples isn't in their biology, it's in our culture. You have, as has been shown many times, way more patience with people on this forum than I do. It's not patience, Dil. She just likes to parade her Googling skills. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ceka Cianci Posted March 20, 2016 Share Posted March 20, 2016 I think we should all get nude and protest.. I'm not much of a planner and more of an idea person..So, Just say where and when and I'm there! \o/ hehehehe Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Madelaine McMasters Posted March 20, 2016 Share Posted March 20, 2016 Hey stranger! So this is what it takes to lure you back? ;-). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ceka Cianci Posted March 20, 2016 Share Posted March 20, 2016 Madelaine McMasters wrote: Hey stranger! So this is what it takes to lure you back? ;-). Pretty much,yess.. hehehehe ETA;This and getting a new computer that can get me out off my sl land to where i can wander the world again.. How have you been? =) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phil Deakins Posted March 20, 2016 Share Posted March 20, 2016 Ceka Cianci wrote: I think we should all get nude and protest.. I'm not much of a planner and more of an idea person..So, Just say where and when and I'm there! \o/ hehehehe Where: my place When: right now Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dillon Levenque Posted March 21, 2016 Share Posted March 21, 2016 *waves* Nice to see you. :-) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Madelaine McMasters Posted March 21, 2016 Share Posted March 21, 2016 Ceka Cianci wrote: How have you been? =) I've been well... better if I'd been naughty. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CheriColette Posted March 21, 2016 Share Posted March 21, 2016 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Madelaine McMasters Posted March 21, 2016 Share Posted March 21, 2016 CheriColette wrote: That's a remarkable likeness, Cheri! My favorite color is purple and my ex-hubby's is blue. I'm half Irish, half German, so my hair is strawberry blonde at the start of summer and blonde by the end. I've fixed that, and any other errors I could find... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CheriColette Posted March 22, 2016 Share Posted March 22, 2016 Thats uncanny Maddy (Ive now replaced my original photo with the new improved (your) one) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rhonda Huntress Posted March 25, 2016 Author Share Posted March 25, 2016 Shamelessly stolen from Men's Health web site ... The legal issues involving nipple censorship in the United States—according to Jeffrey J. Douglas, a criminal defense attorney in Santa Monica who has been defending all forms of sexual speech and conduct for more than 30 years—came from a time and place when Christianity “blamed women for giving men hard-ons.” And Douglas doesn’t think the laws will change any time soon. “I am not optimistic because such changes require organized efforts by a relatively large minority,” he says, adding that the current rules are based on prohibiting women from arousing men, rather than prohibiting men from misbehaving when aroused. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Facebook
Instagram
Twitter
YouTube
Flickr
Recommended Posts
Please take a moment to consider if this thread is worth bumping.
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now