Rya Nitely

Mine has changed too. I always aimed for around $3000 per process credit to reduce fees, but I won't be able to do that now. It will have to be under $2000 a month. So, $15 every month in fees.

@Chic AeonIt's obvious this is to prevent the practice of saving on fees. It was easy to increase my limit. I did it a while back, and they did it fast. I just told them my profit has increased. I'm on $2000 process credit limit, and I may ask to up it again due to these changes. Thanks for the info. Although I have a feeling it might be stricter now.

and what about your friends list? Although many people, like me, wouldn't be any wiser with another name they don't remember friending.

Let me see if I can make it clearer - if you do not like not liking then to not like is to like not liking, or in other words to like or not to like - that is the question

Phil, would I be correct in saying attention to detail is not your strength? . I'm still surprised that over 8000 posts, and you never noticed the views per post in the previous forums (as inaccurate as they may have been).

I know a way to delete my posts. Edit it and add a lot of very descriptive words expressing how I feel about not being able to delete it. I think they will delete it

I must say though, I always suspected that it has to be inaccurate, for the reasons you gave. But then again it did often show some later posts with a higher number of views than much earlier posts, which made me think there must be something in it.

I do remember it and would bet my house on it

but you do remember they had it next to the post, don't you? How accurate it was is another question. It also showed the number of views (next to a post) decreasing the longer the thread became, and over time, which seemed to indicate a loss of interest?

I always found it useful to see how many times a topic or post has been viewed. It let you know the general interest level. It seems we have lost this. Edit: I see it now . Number of times viewed is next to the topic, but you can't see the number of times individual posts have been viewed.

I also believe that the ability to delete a post is important. Almost every other forum has this. It's too restrictive with no very good reason. You should at least be able to delete a post if you are still the last poster, that way nobody has responded to you and there's no confusion. But people change their minds after hitting post. It happens often, and I know I am not alone.

I think it's way too strict. I can understand that it's annoying when someone changes their post after you have responded to it, but I think it will be more annoying if you can't ever delete a post, or edit it after one hour.

yes, I think hiding simply means it is hidden from yourself only

@CheriColette if you catch it within an hour. Yes, that would work. After that you can't edit it.

@Drongle McMahon This is very true. Perhaps some forums should have unlimited editing times. You don't want to be creating a new post to amend the advice you gave 3 days ago, explaining how your original advice was not completely accurate as you left out an important detail. In help and advice threads, further information often becomes available by later posters, with someone correcting your advice and you agreeing with them - this may be pages later, and people may not read that far. Edited (date and time): Perhaps the ability to add to your post like I am doing here, but the original post cannot be changed after an hour.

I agree with the ability to delete posts. People often rant with emotion or just say silly things, hit post and then regret it. I'm sure I'm not alone. Another example: One time I posted under an alt name by mistake. I was responding to someone, and it would have made no sense for the unknown alt to be responding, so I deleted the post.

I really think you should be allowed to delete a post, at least if there are no responses after it.

so, how would I cancel a post if I change my mind. I see Submit Reply, but no cancel button. So, you can cancel an edit but not a new post. And how does one delete a post?

@Rya Nitely

The merchant forum never had kudos. So people who mainly hung around the merchant forum never got many. And I never knew if anyone liked my posts. So now I will know . Edit:Still waiting for likes

hello. Not sure if I like it all yet. I do like the like though. Always felt we needed a like.

Why don't you just put them all in a pretty box, then it would be just one item.

Perrie Juran wrote: ChinRey wrote: Rya Nitely wrote: And I understood it to be a refugee swap deal. If it isn't a swap, why should America do it? I agree that it would be 'dumb'. I haven't read the details but of course it's a give-and-take deal both parties thought would benefit them at the time they agreed on it. Now the current US authorities don't think it's a good deal for them and they want to renegotiate or cancel it. That raises the first two of several questions: Which other agreements do the current US leadership want to run away from? Can other nations trust them at all? Which state leader wants to have a one-on-one talk with Trump knowing that he's likely to tweet details about the chat the next day? If this is the start of a new US immigration regime, where is it going to end? <snip> I've been through a half dozen articles now and can't find anything about a swap or a give and take. Just simply that we'd take some of these refugees. If there is some kind of swap I'd appreciate if someone can point me to it. http://www.skynews.com.au/news/top-stories/2016/09/21/australia-to-join-us-refugee-program.html you can read between the lines

Callum Meriman wrote: Rya Nitely wrote: And I understood it to be a refugee swap deal. If it isn't a swap, why should America do it? I agree that it would be 'dumb'. Well, they heavily vet the 1296 on Manus and Nauru and cherry pick a few, maybe the few Sri Lankans, as a one time event. As well, Mr Obama did not set a time, so it can be in 6 months, 9, 12, 18.... On our side we agreed to take 6000 of theirs from central and South America, no vetting, starting 2017, every year forever. The USA saves money to the order of 6K refugees a year and their camps are a little lighter. Of course now Mr Trump has Mr Turnbull by his short and curlies and will ensure that Darwin houses and stages B1-Bs, in addition to Guam. At the moment Darwin is just used for rotation. Mr Turnball is spineless as well as a waffling waste of space. Should have closed Pine Gap and a few other things. Yes, the very first time we heard about the deal in Australia was that it was a refugee swap. We take asylum seekers from a centre being set up in Costa Rica to help cope with a mass exodus of people fleeing poverty and violence in neighbouring countries and in return America takes our refugees, and the purpose of this is to 'send the strongest possible signal to the people smuggler' that "Those passengers will never settle in this country."

Andi Ghostaltar wrote: I hear what you're saying. But the amount of people who rely on sl as a full time income and to pay bills is very small. Relying soley on sl for income is a huge risk seeing as its user base is declining. Thats even more reason to take steps to help the market recover. You are making a huge assumption here. I will be relying on SL income when I leave my rl job, which is only a few months away YAY!. So now, in this very small sample group of respondents you have two. SL is highly dependent on those who are prepared to take this risk. I don't believe it would survive without them. The very best and most popular products are made by those who create full time. We all know how much time and effort goes into creating. It's hardly possible to also commit to an rl job at the same time. This is why I'm leaving mine, because they have put up with me for years, and the only reason I'm still there is because they can't sack me. SL put me on a downward spiral in my rl job. I couldn't commit to both. Well, this doesn't really have much to do with the subject except that, yes there are many people who rely on this income and have to sell.