Jump to content

New Feature: Scripted Agent Estate Access Discussion


You are about to reply to a thread that has been inactive for 289 days.

Please take a moment to consider if this thread is worth bumping.

Recommended Posts

YES! THIS!

"After Residents consent to the Second Life Terms of Service and connected Privacy Policy, Second Life presents select information about Residents to each other within the Second Life environment. This presentation is for the sole purpose of facilitating interaction within Second Life. Without a separate agreement in place (for e.g. as a sub-processor or vendor), there is no default right that any third party has to collect, store, process, or transmit a Second Life Resident’s Personal Data outside of Second Life."

  • Like 7
  • Thanks 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Scylla Rhiadra said:

YES! THIS!

"After Residents consent to the Second Life Terms of Service and connected Privacy Policy, Second Life presents select information about Residents to each other within the Second Life environment. This presentation is for the sole purpose of facilitating interaction within Second Life. Without a separate agreement in place (for e.g. as a sub-processor or vendor), there is no default right that any third party has to collect, store, process, or transmit a Second Life Resident’s Personal Data outside of Second Life."

But followed by this still puts most of the responsibility on us to, #1 find the info.on the internet that has been collected, #2 handle it ourselves.

So basically, it's now completely against the rules yet they can't do anything about it if we don't know it's happening.

Linden Lab cannot govern activities that happen outside of the Second Life platform. Where Residents determine violations happen outside of Second Life, such as when Personal Data is presented on third-party websites without their consent, multiple options are available.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Rowan Amore said:

But followed by this still puts most of the responsibility on us to, #1 find the info.on the internet that has been collected, #2 handle it ourselves.

So basically, it's now completely against the rules yet they can't do anything about it if we don't know it's happening.

Linden Lab cannot govern activities that happen outside of the Second Life platform. Where Residents determine violations happen outside of Second Life, such as when Personal Data is presented on third-party websites without their consent, multiple options are available.

That was always going to be an issue, of course.

As regards LL's ability to act on it -- if the data is being collected within SL, by any means (including, but not exclusively bots), LL can move against that data collecting operation, shutting it down.

 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So let's say I have a club located in a rented parcel in an estate.
And I use bots to provide services such as greeter/usher, bartending, &c.

Then the estate owner activates the Bot Ban option.

Does that mean I'm sorely out of luck?

Because I'm not sure the estate owner will allow me, a renter, to have my bots to become Estate Manager, for therein lies a clear and present danger of me messing up with the estate, purposefully or accidentally...

Whelp, time for me to hunt around for bot-friendly estates then.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Love Zhaoying said:

Yes? Or, you can be like @Paul Hexemand de-register your Bots?

So basically, I have only 3 options here:

  1. Stop using bots, and make club visitors unhappy, possibly resulting in them stopping to come to my place
  2. Move my club somewhere else, and deal with the tediousness of rebuilding the club, resetting things, another marketing campaign etc.
  3. Break the rules by operating bots but not marking them as "scripted agents", thus fully putting myself in the risk of being banned if someone who hates me reported me for operating bots but not registering them as "scripted agents"

"I have 3 poisons, which one is tastier for you?"

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, primerib1 said:

So let's say I have a club located in a rented parcel in an estate.
And I use bots to provide services such as greeter/usher, bartending, &c.

Then the estate owner activates the Bot Ban option...

This is (edit: one of the reasons...) why I keep saying we need it at parcel level and whitelistable.

Edited by Rick Nightingale
  • Like 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, primerib1 said:

So let's say I have a club located in a rented parcel in an estate.
And I use bots to provide services such as greeter/usher, bartending, &c.

Then the estate owner activates the Bot Ban option.

Does that mean I'm sorely out of luck?

Because I'm not sure the estate owner will allow me, a renter, to have my bots to become Estate Manager, for therein lies a clear and present danger of me messing up with the estate, purposefully or accidentally...

Whelp, time for me to hunt around for bot-friendly estates then.

According to the LL post about it, 

  • When deny_bots is ON, all scripted agents that are not explicitly listed in the estate’s Allowed Access list will be denied access to all of the regions within the Estate.

You don't need to ask the Estate Owner to give the bots Estate Manager status, just to add them to the Region's Allowed Access list.

 

  • Like 10
  • Thanks 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Innula Zenovka said:

According to the LL post about it, 

  • When deny_bots is ON, all scripted agents that are not explicitly listed in the estate’s Allowed Access list will be denied access to all of the regions within the Estate.

You don't need to ask the Estate Owner to give the bots Estate Manager status, just to add them to the Region's Allowed Access list.

 

Oh okay, missed that one line.

I blame it on not enough coffee in the morning (still 6:27am in my place at the time of posting)

Hopefully the Allowed Access list is not already full in the estate where the club is located.

  • Like 4
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Scylla Rhiadra said:

YES! THIS!

"After Residents consent to the Second Life Terms of Service and connected Privacy Policy, Second Life presents select information about Residents to each other within the Second Life environment. This presentation is for the sole purpose of facilitating interaction within Second Life. Without a separate agreement in place (for e.g. as a sub-processor or vendor), there is no default right that any third party has to collect, store, process, or transmit a Second Life Resident’s Personal Data outside of Second Life."

I suspect the whole thing is due to shushpishuns that ElEl was not in compliance with the GeeDeePeeArr.

Edited by Love Zhaoying
I'm using code because Lindens are bad at maths so probably bad at code too.
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, primerib1 said:

Oh okay, missed that one line.

I blame it on not enough coffee in the morning (still 6:27am in my place at the time of posting)

Hopefully the Allowed Access list is not already full in the estate where the club is located.

You can have 500 people on the region's allowed list, so unless your club is on a region that doesn't allow public access (not the best place for a club, perhaps) I doubt that would be an issue. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Lindens
1 hour ago, Scylla Rhiadra said:

Soft Linden tweeted it.

 

I pointed it out, but you'll find a link in the Scripted Agent Policy that was blogged today. See the "Using Personal Data" link within that policy.

Of note, the Scripted Agent Policy was previously named the Bot Policy. "Scripted Agent" is a term that's inclusive of what people often call a "Bot."

  • Like 6
  • Thanks 12
Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, Soft Linden said:

I pointed it out, but you'll find a link in the Scripted Agent Policy that was blogged today. See the "Using Personal Data" link within that policy.

Of note, the Scripted Agent Policy was previously named the Bot Policy. "Scripted Agent" is a term that's inclusive of what people often call a "Bot."

Thanks for all you do, Soft!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Innula Zenovka said:

According to the LL post about it, 

  • When deny_bots is ON, all scripted agents that are not explicitly listed in the estate’s Allowed Access list will be denied access to all of the regions within the Estate.

You don't need to ask the Estate Owner to give the bots Estate Manager status, just to add them to the Region's Allowed Access list.

 

Does this help @Paul Hexemin Bellisseria?

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Scylla Rhiadra said:

An interesting impact of the extension of the scripted agent ban to Bellisseria is that bots will no longer be able to list vacant Linden Homes there.

Seems to me that levels the playing field when people are shopping for land in Belli. Those who don't know about such things are at a huge disadvantage. One of the many reasons I don't bother participating in a lot of things on the grid. All too often getting info or help that I need never happens, so I end up still on the outside looking in.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, LittleMe Jewell said:

No, because the "estate" is Bellisseria and controlled by LL.  They are the ones that would have to add his bots to an "always allow list".

That's what I meant. Is LL willing to add bots on request for Belli to the allow list? Paul seems to be good people.

Edited by Love Zhaoying
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You are about to reply to a thread that has been inactive for 289 days.

Please take a moment to consider if this thread is worth bumping.

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...