Jump to content

LittleMe Jewell

Resident
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    24,065

  • Joined

  • Days Won

    80

LittleMe Jewell last won the day on May 3

LittleMe Jewell had the most liked content!

Reputation

53,388 Excellent

Community Answers

2

See answers

54 Followers

See all followers

Retained

  • Member Title
    Life is a progressively-depressing experience

Recent Profile Visitors

20,248 profile views
  1. LittleMe Jewell
    Too many F'in threads about the damn TOS changes.
  2. LittleMe Jewell
    I had one tornado touch down near my house when I was a child living in Kansas City, MO. It was a very freaky experience. We've had some here in CO, but they are almost always further east, on the plains. The mountains seem to keep them from touching down too close and we are just past the foothills.
  3. LittleMe Jewell
    IMO, we need another 1 or 2, at least.
  4. LittleMe Jewell
    It's kind of like all those homes built in cities on the coast that are below sea level - and then being surprised when they get flooded.
  5. LittleMe Jewell
    I was not able to make it to the inworld meeting today. Did anyone ask about the side and back straps for the female top modesty panel?
  6. LittleMe Jewell started following Modesty Patch Discussion and Account hacked!
  7. LittleMe Jewell
    Account Security Phone Support / Fraud Hotline: 800-860-6990 Our Account Security team is available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. Account Possibly Hacked - follow these instructions https://lindenlab.freshdesk.com/support/solutions/articles/31000135214-what-to-do-if-your-account-has-been-compromised or here http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/Linden_Lab_Official:Account_Security
  8. LittleMe Jewell
    That is a MUCH BETTER landing page. I hadn't noticed it yet, so thanks for pointing it out.
  9. LittleMe Jewell
    I probably wouldn't push on the issue, but I would still bring it up.
  10. LittleMe Jewell
    I'm still not seeing the issue. If someone is presenting as a female, they need the top modesty layer. If they are presenting as male, they do not. Trans children still usually present as one or the other -- though neither is an option, but as far as the modesty layer goes, they would not need the top/breast panel.
  11. LittleMe Jewell
    IMO, a filter should NEVER default to being On or Checked.
  12. LittleMe Jewell
    Yes, and there is absolutely nothing wrong with any of that clothing. Teens should be able to wear it.
  13. LittleMe Jewell
    Yes
  14. LittleMe Jewell
    Boy does that bring back memories
  15. LittleMe Jewell
    They could have easily gotten by with the female top panel just covering the breasts, without the side and back strap. I don't have any avatars that play teens, but I still think that they shouldn't have to suffer, clothing wise, because LL wants them to dress the same as younger child avatars. Yes, I know SL is not RL -- and I have said that myself -- but still..............
  16. LittleMe Jewell
    You have to remember that the 'child avatar' rules apply to ALL avatars that are under the age of 18. The defined modesty layer makes perfect sense for anyone grade school age and under, but it is a bit much, IMO, for anyone older than that. In other words, anyone playing a late teen just got screwed, clothing-wise. I wore tops like the one pictured below when I was in my teens (i.e. middle school and high school). There is nothing inappropriate with this top -- yet it would be showing part of the female upper modesty panel, and thus (by your statement) is something that I shouldn't have been wearing anyway. Though, with a bit of work, the back strap of the modesty panel can possibly be worked to be lower than the top over it. I guess it depends on how the creators ultimately make the back strap of that panel and how creators make tops where the upper back is bare.
×
×
  • Create New...