Jump to content

Elon Musk buys Twitter to bring back Free Speech


You are about to reply to a thread that has been inactive for 797 days.

Please take a moment to consider if this thread is worth bumping.

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, Eirynne Sieyes said:

Free speech has to be respectful.

If it isn't it will, conversation will quickly degrade into the disparaging, vitriolic mess that is all too common here and elsewhere.

"Fascist" is, again, the literal definition of what I am describing. I ascribe it to neither side, nor to any individuals: it is a tendency that I see expressed in this thread and elsewhere.

If you chose to apply it to yourself or someone else, you take responsibility for that yourself: I have not done so.

If you disagree with my characterization, or don't see it, as I do, being articulated here, then you should debate me on that score.

But civil discourse involves respecting the right of others to express themselves and their views. It does not entail censoring what one sees. We can't debate intelligently unless you understand my perspective. And I'm not going to "pretend" that something as important as this isn't happening here because it might "upset" some people.

  • Like 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Eirynne Sieyes said:
22 minutes ago, Luna Bliss said:

Scylla said some people on this thread are advocating fascism.  That's simply the truth. And you don't have to be aware that's what you're doing for this to apply.

It's up to you if you are one who is doing this and choose to feel hurt by it.

Hmmm... There is a middle ground here, yet you seem to be making the argument - which I am strongly opposed to - that it is OK to shame, disparage or name call someone because you feel like it and choose to disregard how the target person may handle it. 

This is not name-calling in any way.
Fascism is simply a description of one way people sort out power in a society -- who gets what and how. I'm against allowing only a few people, most especially unelected ones, having most of the power -- this centralization of power is dangerous. I believe in democracy where as many people as possible have a say in who gets what in our world.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Scylla Rhiadra said:

But civil discourse involves respecting the right of others to express themselves and their views. It does not entail censoring what one sees. We can't debate intelligently unless you understand my perspective. And I'm not going to "pretend" that something as important as this isn't happening here because it might "upset" some people.

Nothing wrong in my book with upsetting people. A good debate will upset some people.

However, it might benefit all of us if we could shoot for a more respectful and perhaps considerate tone.

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1
  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Most interesting info in the thread: repeated notification of the totally true, acknowledged by the NYT story of Biden's son's laptop. Also the most irrelevant. But we should count how many times people assert something is totally true, because don't totally true things always need to be asserted over and over and over?
 

Because totally true things have to be emphasized, as not just true, but totally true. If we didn't know they weren't just true, but in fact totally true, we would miss the important distinctions of truth. There's "truth", then there's "totally true".  

The most honest people - be it politicians, lawyers, what-have-you, always make sure to add "totally" when describing things that are true. Didn't you notice that? It's totally true!

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Eirynne Sieyes said:
13 minutes ago, Scylla Rhiadra said:

But civil discourse involves respecting the right of others to express themselves and their views. It does not entail censoring what one sees. We can't debate intelligently unless you understand my perspective. And I'm not going to "pretend" that something as important as this isn't happening here because it might "upset" some people.

Nothing wrong in my book with upsetting people. A good debate will upset some people.

However, it might benefit all of us if we could shoot for a more respectful and perhaps considerate tone.

To shoot for a more respectful and considerate tone with this particular issue one would need to have been inconsiderate and disrespectful,  Nobody has.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Love Zhaoying said:

Most interesting info in the thread: repeated notification of the totally true, acknowledged by the NYT story of Biden's son's laptop. Also the most irrelevant. But we should count how many times people assert something is totally true, because don't totally true things always need to be asserted over and over and over?
 

Because totally true things have to be emphasized, as not just true, but totally true. If we didn't know they weren't just true, but in fact totally true, we would miss the important distinctions of truth. There's "truth", then there's "totally true".  

The most honest people - be it politicians, lawyers, what-have-you, always make sure to add "totally" when describing things that are true. Didn't you notice that? It's totally true!

Like! Totally awesome!

you-went-valley-girl-never-go-valley-gir

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Luna Bliss said:

To shoot for a more respectful and considerate tone with this particular issue one would need to have been inconsiderate and disrespectful,  Nobody has.

Lol! What prompted me to start this sub-discussion around page 19 was the vitriol and hate speech in many of the posts, mostly attached to political ideology.

The thread has cleaned up quite a bit. Seems that talking about it has resulted in more mindful posting.

Yay for us!

 

  • Like 2
  • Haha 1
  • Confused 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Eirynne Sieyes said:

Lol! What prompted me to start this sub-discussion around page 19 was the vitriol and hate speech in many of the posts, mostly attached to political ideology.

The thread has cleaned up quite a bit. Seems that talking about it has resulted in more mindful posting.

Yay for us!

 

We aim to please! 
 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Free speech" as bandied about by some here is by no means forcibly kept respectful (or derivatives).

These fora are kept artificially "respectful".

Do not pretend otherwise. Do not pretend that such is a good thing.

Edited by Solar Legion
Spelling Correction
  • Like 1
  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, Solar Legion said:

"Free speech" as bandied about by some here is by no means forcibly kept respectful (or derivatives).

These fora are kept artificially "respectful".

Do not pretend otherwise. Do not pretend that such is a good thing.

Pretend? Heck no! 

If you think I mean that we have to pretend in order to remain civil, I am saddened.  I am referring to resisting the urge to hastily post emotionally laden content (because it feels good) without taking the time to reflect on what will be said in hot-button topics.

Hopefully we are misunderstanding one another. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Eirynne Sieyes said:

Pretend? Heck no! 

If you think I mean that we have to pretend in order to remain civil, I am saddened.  I am referring to resisting the urge to hastily post emotionally laden content (because it feels good) without taking the time to reflect on what will be said in hot-button topics.

Hopefully we are misunderstanding one another. 

If you think that taking the time to weigh what you are typing is being "respectful" then we are speaking of two wholly different things.

If you think that being civil in any capacity is a requirement ... we will not see eye to eye on this whatsoever.

Some of what you are seeing and praising is "pretend" - users having to "bite their tongues" as it were and respond in a manner which will ensure no action is taken on their post(s).

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, Solar Legion said:

If you think that taking the time to weigh what you are typing is being "respectful" then we are speaking of two wholly different things.

If you think that being civil in any capacity is a requirement ... we will not see eye to eye on this whatsoever.

Some of what you are seeing and praising is "pretend" - users having to "bite their tongues" as it were and respond in a manner which will ensure no action is taken on their post(s).

Suffice it to say that we don't share the same values.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, Solar Legion said:

If you think that taking the time to weigh what you are typing is being "respectful" then we are speaking of two wholly different things.

If you think that being civil in any capacity is a requirement ... we will not see eye to eye on this whatsoever.

Some of what you are seeing and praising is "pretend" - users having to "bite their tongues" as it were and respond in a manner which will ensure no action is taken on their post(s).

Perhaps  because I'm a Brit of a certain age and background, I consider civility an important obligation, and particularly in a public forum.

  • Like 4
  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Eirynne Sieyes said:

Suffice it to say that we don't share the same values.

That's nice.

1 hour ago, Innula Zenovka said:

Perhaps  because I'm a Brit of a certain age and background, I consider civility an important obligation, and particularly in a public forum.

That is - also - nice.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Eirynne Sieyes said:

Pretend? Heck no! 

If you think I mean that we have to pretend in order to remain civil, I am saddened.  I am referring to resisting the urge to hastily post emotionally laden content (because it feels good) without taking the time to reflect on what will be said in hot-button topics.

Hopefully we are misunderstanding one another. 

Isn't that what this whole thread has been about. In particular, Elon Musk's lack of self control and abusive posting on twitter and the concerns from those groups he has targeted that he will be more tolerant to abusive posting if the deal goes through?

  • Like 4
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Aethelwine said:

Isn't that what this whole thread has been about. In particular, Elon Musk's lack of self control and abusive posting on twitter and the concerns from those groups he has targeted that he will be more tolerant to abusive posting if the deal goes through?

No. Though some seem to have misunderstood it that way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You are about to reply to a thread that has been inactive for 797 days.

Please take a moment to consider if this thread is worth bumping.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...