Theresa Tennyson

HeroX0 wrote: Second life not starting, at launch it is saying that "Second life is unabel to run because your video card drivers did not install properly, are out of date, or are for unsupported hardware. please make sure you have the latest video card drivers and even if you do have the latest, try reinstalling them. i have Nvidea Quadro 290 2 GB , 4GB Ram, Dual core 2.7 Ghz and all the latest drivers, so what to do. its not the net problem because it worked on the same net before in my laptop and before that on my Previous PC. what to do? dont tell me i cant play it and i have to reinstall my drivers. Okay, I won't tell you you can't play it. However, I WILL tell you that the system requirements specifically say that Nvidia Quadro cards haven't been tested. Nvidia bills Quadro cards as professional 2D cards so they probably aren't optimized for 3D display, which is what you need for SL. It's like hiring a brilliant painter and asking them to make you a sculpture. They might be able to do it but they might not.

Are you referring to messages sent to your offline E-mail? There are reports recently of Hotmail and possibly other Email providers hitting automatic Emails from Second Life through a prescreening filter so they're blocked even before they get to your spam folder.

WolfBaginski Bearsfoot wrote: This is the only place I can see for getting money into the LindeX system It's the third line: "Currently, you must add at least USD 25.00 at a time." If I have misunderstood that, Linden Labs need to explain things with more clarity. Once the money is there, it seems to be usable for anything. You don't have to convert it to L$ in one lump. But, as they tell you, you can't get it back out. Theresa Tennyson looks at the clicky button on her viewer that says, "Buy L$". Any time you buy Lindens, including the small amount that you buy through clicky buttons, you're putting money into the LindeX system. I think what you're looking at is strictly for limit orders where you can try to determine your exchange rate, and they put a minimum amount so people don't gum up the system because they want to pay 23 cents for an imaginary tank top instead of 24. And you know there'd be people who'd do exactly that if they had a chance.

Steph Catseye wrote: LL MUST get their act together, the government suggests that virtual currencies are not a token they are currencies, that makes LindeX a bank and not only that a bank is not allowed to keep money longer than 24 hours, they need to provide better options because Paypal is for babies and Ebayers but not for business owners. Where? In the United States banks frequently won't allow you to withdraw all the money from a large deposit for days.

Have you installed a viewer for SL? Safari can't access the SL 3D world directly. Normally teleports from the web site are done by clicking on a web link which will then open the browser application separately - It isn't a plugin.

The way Second LIfe works is usually that the developers at Linden Lab provide a basic framework that other people can use to create things. For instance, there are attachments you can buy that will give you an "ovulation cycle" and get "pregnant," but this isn't a built-in feature of the avatars. There is also the possibility to have your avatars' "health" go down in certain sims that enable that. What you're suggesting is more of a project for an independent creator in Second Life than one for the Linden Lab developers themselves.

Staralien wrote: And everyone has one. The world is made up of many different kinds of people, from all walks of life, backgrounds, moral fiber, etc. Just because you don't agree with someone doesn't make them wrong. Unless of course they killed someone or stole something or are just a piece of crap that treats others like a piece of crap. Then it becomes questionable. Some people you.. Just. Don't. Like. Period. Doesn't make them a bad person, just means there is a conflict of personalities. Seems like the ones who get along in the world best are the ones who keep their opinions to themselves. All of us who post here just are not like that. :matte-motes-big-grin: Just my two pennies! Have a great day/night! As humanity has expanded the area of "civilization" many wild animals have had their population decline dramatically but there's one big exception - the coyote. Coyotes are actually more widespread now than they ever have been. I heard someone describe the reason for their success by saying, "Coyotes never get into a fight they can't win." Makes sense to me.

Rudy Schwartzman wrote: Then explain to me why the only thing that changed in the equation was time. Linden Lab changed how they send HTTP information to viewers a month or so ago; it actually improved performance for most people. For you, apparently, it didn't. Also a number of third-party viewers defaulted to having HTTP textures switched off until recently, but server-side baking will make heavy use of HTTP so they changed their defaults.

Sounds like a known problem with Intel HD4000 graphics, Windows 8 and SL. Simplest fix is to turn off basic shaders.

This is what i've been able to work out on this problem from reading posts and my personal experience: 1) The problem is that viewers don't draw certain objects in their caches when you first arrive at an area you've been to before. It seems to be related to an object being partially in your field of view and partially out of your field of view - since it's partially out of your view the viewer doesn't think it needs to be drawn, but because it's partially IN view the viewer doesn't think of it as a new object when you move your view to see more of it. 2) The problem has been around for a while but has appeared to get worse recently because the server code was recently changed to increase the number of classes of visible objects that can be read from the cache instead of being sent from the servers from scratch. 3) The missing objects will re-appear whenever you force the viewer to re-draw a scene - this can be by zooming way out and then back in, by changing the shader settings in "Preferences" or by going into and out of wireframe mode. Right clicking objects also works because that causes a redraw for those particular objects.

Overall height is a combination of a number of different settings. For example, if your leg length is set at 100 then that will mean the minimum height you can set with the main "height" slider will be taller than it would be if your leg length was set to 30. Go through your entire shape and adjust the "length" settings down until you can get to the height you want to be.

Rudy Schwartzman wrote: I know what I'm talking about and I know the difference between kilobytes per second and kilobits per second and my network connection gives me a reliable, sustained 800+ KBytes per second end-to-end. My in-house network from the DSL modem to the computer on which I run Firestorm is cabled gigabit Ethernet. I've used the speed test sites (several of them) many times. Just now it reports 7.06 Mbps. Now can we dispense with the suggestion that this is a network capacity problem at my end? Now that you're no longer describing your connection speed in furlongs per fortnight we can dispense with the suggestion that the problem is your connection SPEED. However, that still leaves the apparent problem your setup has handling HTTP textures. Try the suggestions on this page: http://wiki.phoenixviewer.com/http_fetching_issues Also add your comments with your hardware specs, especially the brand and model of modem and/or router, to this Firestorm JIRA - http://jira.phoenixviewer.com/browse/FIRE-10020

Older second hand desktop yes, AMD CPU maybe, AMD video chip NO FOR GOD SAKES NO. Second Life performance is 90% video card. Integrated laptop video just isn't designed to render dragons flying around. You'll want some variety of dedicated GPU and Second Life uses OpenGL as the graphics language. ATI/AMD video cards tend to have a lot of problems with OpenGL so you'll want to get a Nvidia card.

It sounds like there are two basic possibilities: 1) You are getting not 800 kiloBYTES per second but 800 kiloBITS per second, and you have a not-very-good router. This is what I'd expect to see with DSL. 2) You actually HAVE upgraded your DSL to the point that you actually can GET the 6400 kilobits per second you say you're getting but you have a HORRIBLE router, at least in how it handles multiple HTTP connections.. If you're consistently seeing avatars not having their textures loading that's a connection issue plain and simple. Last night I was at a club with over 40 avatars and my Popular Mechanix sub-2000 kbps cable connection and $69 Wal-Mart cable modem rendered everyone in a few minutes. Turning off HTTP textures may help in the short term but more and more things are moving over to HTTP so you should try to get the problems it sounds like you're having with HTTP textures addressed.

Rudy Schwartzman wrote: Motherboard: ASUS P8Z68 Deluxe/Gen3 CPU: Intel i7 2600K Quad Core w/ HyperThreading; 3.4 GHz RAM: 16 GB Video card: EVGA nVidia GeForce GTX 680; PCIe 3.0; 2 GB GDDR5 RAM Internet: DSL; Inbound rate: > 800 KBytes / sec sustained. Rudy, that's just... slow. Sorry. That's a touch faster than when I got my first broadband connection over four years ago and went with the cheapest possible option. I've lived between a rural party store and a cornfield and I had a faster connection there. Right now I live in an apartment complex where the owner apparently reads Popular Mechanix and decided to provide us with free cable internet and my connection's twice as fast here and it still ain't that great. And you probably got a really cheap router with it too. SL viewers using HTTP try to open a lot of connections simultaneously and some routers choke on that.

greek Wingtips wrote: Dear Amethyst, you make rather sweeping statements to which I like you to set the record, you said "No one on the forums has a vested interest in SL unless they are a Linden" is this something you know as a fact or guessing,and please stand corrected I never suspected or said you have or had an vested interest you implied that what I think, big differenced However, in your other thread you did explicitly say you thought Renn Toxx had a vested interest in SL when they disagreed with you.

greek Wingtips wrote: Wikipedia not mine "A key factor to consider with vested interest is the level/type of involvement the individual has with a particular attitude object" Basically, you just said "A key factor to consider with cats is whether they are short-haired or long-haired." Doesn't define cats in the least. Here's the definition of "vested interest." Vested Interest n. 1. Law A right or title, as to present or future possession of an estate, that can be conveyed to another. 2. A fixed right granted to an employee under a pension plan. 3. A special interest in protecting or promoting that which is to one's own personal advantage. 4. vested interests Those groups that seek to maintain or control an existing system or activity from which they derive private benefit.

Teagan Tobias wrote: I saw the post the other day, it was up and gone rather quickly, it said the money was sent by accident. As I recall there was no mention of product or services, only that the money was transferred accidentally. And now that we know the product or service involved, I have enough experience in that particular field to know that L$25000 is right around ten times the going rate for what I imagine was "exchanged." Sure sounds like somebody accidentally typed in an extra zero, and somebody else didn't want to give up found money.

greek Wingtips wrote: So why does it have to be the ATI driver at fault and not the code that LL write and test,there driver work perfect with all the 100s of software I use only sl, but if you have a vested interest in sl maybe an employee you would say that, Because most of the other 100s of software you use DON'T use OpenGL, the graphics protocol that Second LIfe uses. All indications are that ATI writes their OpenGL drivers by taping a paper lunch bag around a cat's head and having it walk around on a keyboard for a while. ATI is notorious for bad OpenGL drivers and has been for some time with many programs that use it. To answer your next logical question, Second Life uses OpenGL because it runs on Macs and LInux machines as well as Windows machines and it allows the viewer to be open-source. (And it works just fine on Nvidia cards because Nvidia takes the paper bag off the cat's head before it writes the drivers.)

It had some bug fixes but the big difference is it has support for a new and (hopefully) more reliable way of rendering avatars called "Server-Side Baking" or SSB. The system itself hasn't been turned on yet but it will be in the next few weeks and viewers need to be updated so it will work properly.

A lot of the web-based accessory functions like web profiles are actually handled by a separate program that the viewer loads called "SLplugin.exe" or something similar. Make sure your anti-virus or firewall isn't blocking it.

Ooo, just had a thought - if "Hardware Cloth" (or something that sounds similar) is on in your graphics preferences, turn it off. It's an old setting that was meant to simulate the effect of "wind" on system clothes and it's certainly not that great an effect. I don't think turning it off will hurt anything and it may help, especially with the pant legs. This is different from "Hardware Skinning",which is needed for some things involving mesh and should stay on.

Your processor, memory and hard drive look just fine - SL has very little use for your hard drive. The graphics card should be okay but not spectacular - I have a GT 640 which I like but isn't top of the line by any means. You can see how you like it now and upgrade it later. You'll certainly have no problems running modern viewers at medium settings or seeing mesh. If you upgrade your video in the future you'll want to upgrade your power supply at the same time - the GT630 is probably right at the high end of what a 300 watt power supply will handle and it probably doesn't have the specialized power connectors that many more powerful video cards use. Power supplies are comparatively cheap and can be dropped into a standard full-sized tower chassis without too much drama - I did it myself this past weekend. I assume you're getting WIndows 8 - at this exact moment in time you might look into getting Windows 7 instead. HP was still offering a few boxes with it when I checked a few days ago. SL can run under Windows 8 but there are still some rough patches apparently. However, the complaints I hear don't seem to be coming from Nvidia users so you could be okay.

The servers play very little role in displaying avatar shapes and they are actually running OLDER code than normal right now. Seeing shapes, both yours and others, are basically a viewer function. There are a few possibilities: 1) With server-side baking there's a new parameter added to the shape called "Hover" that was an attempt to compensate for the inability to use TPV Z-offset adjustments with the new system. This has been known to cause glitches with body fat and it may be causing problems with shoulder blades too. This parameter was introduced viewer-side with the latest Firestorm release. See if you see the same thing with an older viewer. 2) Some badly-made rigged meshes can deform body shapes semi-permanently - it's mainly noticeable around the eyes. There are ways to reset them though. The best possibility is probably this, though: 3) They may have ALWAYS looked like that. If your shoulders are narrow your shoulder blades will stick out in sharp points but because the lighting is fairly flat you don't notice them with the standard straight-on view of your avatar's back. However, the points are very noticeable from certain unusual angles and have been as long as I can remember.

unit13 wrote: Freebie Galaxy isn't script-enabled, so your verbose OP just proves 1) you're a liar 2) you're mentally ill. I have no clue what you hoped to achieve with this gibberish, but if it seriously brightened up your day...then please, please - top yourself in RL. I'm not kidding either. I once worked with a woman who was, shall we say, very confident in her own knowledge and not so confident in that of others. So much so, in fact, that one day there was a cloudburst and I mentioned it was hailing. She, without looking out the window, said, "No it's not - it's not cold enough" as I was watching hailstones bouncing off a metal roof. Hi, Nanette!