Lucia Nightfire

I had this happen a few months back after a roll, which was mysteriously rolled back and not much info was given. The script had been running for months without issue, then repeated stack heaps after the roll, then none again after the rollback. I had to create a debug channel listener and script pin injection setup to replace the script whenever it borked. I'm weary that LL is screwing around with script memory or VM memory swapping/handling/priority or garbage collection protocols.

They pitched this for over 2 years, even adding a viewer check to block anything over 30 seconds from being uploaded then when it comes time for release it is absent from the feature set. Then when I bring it up in the Web meeting, they pass the buck to the Server team, who doesn't sign off on anything for Premium Plus.

4GB of ram with 64 bit?🤨

Look up "adobe houses"?

Why? Was Catznip doing something different with images than other TPVs? If not, are they also at risk as well in some way? What kind of damage are we talking here? heh

What "component" was this and what data got corrupted?

Curious which creator this was, what they're going to change and for what product.

Yeah, they really should have incorporated a state cycling protocol.

Not just squishy thighs, but also squishy breasts. 😉 The latter has taken off big time and will soon have a higher % usage by Reborn users than almost all other breast mods/types with their corresponding bodies. I'm seeing 8.3% of Reborn users wearing squishy breasts ATM.

If the sploder, both, takes money from users and is not in a Skill Gaming region, then it violates the Skill Gaming policy.

These numbers are not taken at my store (which doesn't exist and if it did, would only skew the data). The data is from users seen by my bots and scripted apps traveling the grid daily to any/all venues/region themes. Also, that data has changed since that post. Reborn is currently ranked #14 and is the best trending body, projected to be ranked #5 in a year at its current uptake. It has even matched the same daily unit increase as Maitreya - Lara for the past few days, which TBF, has had a major reduction lately, probably from users buying other brands, instead.

This begs the question, "Should LL include on the Premium Plus details/confirmation page, the option to tier down if the additional free tier subtracted from your current tier would put you in a lower bracket?" This would be similar to selling group owned land with it's option to release the donated tier, but in this case, only the 1024sqm difference. There is no moratorium to allow you the time to tier down after upgrading your account, even if you could do it seconds after. Once you've upgraded your account while also using tier, you're taking that hit next month. It's "almost" like a double whammy or double tax. [EDIT] I guess it's actually complicated if you're donating tier, but if you're not donating tier, I still think the option could be possible. [EDIT] I guess it is further complicated because tier dates don't coincide with account billing dates.

I knew I shouldn't have pinned a medal on mine, heh.

🥇 I think "Longest streak logged in" is simply a total of the number of times you were seen logged in at midnight and/or noon consecutively, else mine would be every day for the last few years. Also, it seems to total stats across all of your accounts.

At the advent of experiences, I filed this feature request for an option for land owners to limit script usage on a parcel/region to that of only scripts compiled with experiences allowed on the land. Opponents of said feature complained that their unaffiliated attachment's scripts would stop working, but that was entirely the point. This feature will deter worn scripted cheat vectors, but it won't stop TPVs with "cheat" vectors, like radars, area search, mouselook target markers or unscripted AOs.

Also, when he says in both videos, "Right click your avatar and choose 'Shape...'.", there's a good chance new users are going to struggle there depending on the mesh body they bought. Sometimes it is impossible to right-click certain mesh bodies. I would have said, "Right-click your name tag and choose 'Shape...'." instead.

Also, shoutout to the detach bug LL has yet to fix after years of complaints captured in the Maitreya - Lara tutorial at 1:46.

So LL indirectly endorsed the top two popular mesh bodies with their "How to Update Your Avatar's Body" series the other day by showcasing Maitreya - Lara and Signature - Gianni. My questions now are, "Are popular mesh head brands like Genus and LeLutka going to be showcased next?" "Are they going to do this for other mesh heads/bodies not as fortunate to be the top brands?". "What about furry heads/bodies?" Thoughts?

Consolidating the body portion data might make total body numbers look attractive, but seeing as Altamura still titles their headless bodies and full bodies with individual names regardless of what base is used, reporting them consolidated would probably be a detrimental to determining individual make/model popularity, at least as far as full bodies go even if the head portion was the primary factor for purchase. There are "creators" that rebadge Ruth/Roth heads and Ocacin bodies as something else, even offering dozens of the same head/body with different names, typically as a "complete avatar" and I don't consolidate those either.

Reborn is now ranked #14, having passed Slink - Hourglass and Slink - Male. If the current trend is maintained, it will be ranked #10 in 90 days, #7 in 180 days and #5 in 360 days. This calculation takes into account the current trends of all other bodies.

You sunk money into something and don't remember what it is called? Sounds like me with alt coins, heh.

The amount you pay is the amount of tier you are allocating to your account. It doesn't matter if it is being consumed by land ownership or donation to a group. If your group's land use is covered by other members' donated tier, you can simply "tier down" on the bottom of your account's Land Use Fees page by selecting a lower bracket and saving changes.

Grid scope experiences were offered to those whom participated in the experience closed beta period testing. Experience maturity is not something LL demands correlates with region rating, nor enforces such. Nowhere in the documentation is this mentioned. Experience ratings exist strictly as a means of control for experience owners/admin. LL operates G rated experiences in Adult regions.

The dev that implemented OBJECT_SELECT_COUNT told me objects keep a list of user keys selecting them which is what that feature counts so you'd have to file a feature request for access to the key list. I've even wanted access for feedback with physics, omega and animesh apps which can't function correctly while selected . "Maybe" also to allow an alert system for my attachments when someone is being nosey. 😆