Jump to content

Solar Legion

Resident
  • Posts

    5,377
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Solar Legion

  1. Well that was only a matter of time .... Since no one else seems to have said it quite as bluntly, I'll be the "villain" here - News Flash: Like it or not, not every single "victim" is in fact, a victim. This is a very harsh truth that complicates matters quite a bit. Others have already chimed in on the absolute BS statement that certain things do not work (globally/as a rule).
  2. Oh I understand very well on that. Personally I rather disagree though: It may not be worth putting it into words but sometimes lodging your disagreement (or other sentiments) is still worthwhile and is still a contribution of a sort. But to each, their own.
  3. Use the bloody reactions and let those for whom it grates on ... stew in their own juices. Sometimes the only decent or proper response is one of those. Especially if the topic is one that has been done to death or one wherein the same stuff has been hashed and rehashed.
  4. Any social platform, game, VW etc can be toxic depending on the company one keeps/where one goes and such.
  5. Yes? Bit heavy pawed? I don't respond well to the sort of attitude given.
  6. That's nice. Not interested in anything whatsoever except making certain actual facts on this are being utilized and the actual history and present situation are understood. You may call that "attention seeking" if you like - a response to my posts was not required of you. Don't like being corrected? That's fine. Don't pretend it is anything other than what it is: Being corrected. As for "attention seeking" - there is no need to announce blocking an individual. Block or do not - announcing it is nothing more than seeking drama.
  7. Yes, it is. Wishing it is otherwise does not make it so - especially in this age wherein having 2FA as an option locks you out of using it if you have 2FA enabled. It is outdated - beginning and end. Here are your straws back - use them elsewhere.
  8. Yeah no - unless you're the Dev of a particular Viewer, name dropping any singular one in particular in these situations is absolutely unnecessary - beginning and end. The information types you're suggesting would be "useful" are "useful" no matter what mobile viewer one has been using - end of.
  9. That's nice. Lumiya is no longer being updated - it is deprecated. Check the TPV Directory and you'll see more than it as Mobile Viewers. Simple fact. So no, it is not "basically synonymous" with "mobile viewer" - it is a singular, deprecated/obsolete mobile viewer.
  10. Then say: "I utilize mobile viewers often" and do not name drop a long deprecated viewer - the only user/person who really ought to be doing so in any context related to LL's own mobile viewer is the Lumiya Dev or the Dev of any other Mobile Viewer if pitching their expertise/services in an effort to join the existing team or offer them improvements. Beyond those scenarios, which mobile viewer you've used is irrelevant here.
  11. It can and there is also a dock (official and several third party ones) that allows you to connect it to a TV or monitor and other peripherals. But yep - this idea that mobile devices (phones) are anywhere near that level is absolutely ridiculous. Such devices are great for travel or budget users.
  12. That's nice - don't care much about that fantasy world though. The reality is quite a bit different - deal with it and stop pretending otherwise.
  13. We are a ways off from a smart phone being an actual Desktop replacement - streaming/remote services do not count in that either. People really need to stop pretending we are farther along than we are.
  14. M'kay- never said you were 'stupid' so do us both a favor and don't pull that again, hmm? No, when you accept it is a "yes until I personally revoke this" - if you forget to revoke it, that is on you. If you do not know, you can be shown that it is revokable and how. If you are to lazy that is on you. If you do not realize what was accepted then why did you accept it in the first place? Avatar attachments work similarly - until you revoke their permission (for some this is as simple as removing the object) they continue to have said permission. As far as exploitation goes: You can be exploited in any manner of ways within Second Life, the use of an Experience is not required for such. There have been topics started in the past on the varied fora concerning the varied exploitable permissions (including the Debit permission) as well as RLV systems - this is nothing new whatsoever and the answer is always the same: Educate users on what is possible. Not what someone imagines is possible, what is actually possible.
  15. Except that there is no "yes forever" option unless you yourself choose to leave that permission in place. Read the documentation - it can be revoked at any time and it does not require much to do so.
  16. That's nice. I laugh at amusing things. I also laugh when someone says/does/posts/suggests something absolutely ridiculous with no care for what is being presented in said post. Want a discussion? Act like it. Then it will be treated as such. Simple.
  17. If an actual discussion is desired then all the charged language, standoffishness and hyperbole needs to be dropped. So far I'm seeing it only from the one end. So if ya'll want an actual discussion, act like it.
  18. Bit late to the party and to close that barn door. A decent enough show of paranoia though - thanks, needed that. Now then ... Go and learn about Experiences. Simple enough system to use. As for the entire RLV vs Experiences quibbling back and forth: One side has remained objective, one has not (and it isn't the side demonizing Experiences).
  19. I do truly wish that the Gaemerz crowd, those adjacent and their apologists would stop trying to insist that Second Life needs to be just like the latest craze or to keep up with the latest fads (among other absolute BS) and further stop trying to treat this platform as if it is even remotely built along the same lines ... It isn't. Period. To make it even remotely like the rest of that drek would require the entire system to be scrapped and everything to be rebuilt in such a manner as to preclude everything that made and makes Second Life be Second Life. Even the blasted VR centric platforms that some pretend are actual competitors do not have anything whatsoever remotely resembling what some seem to think we need here.
  20. I present to you, the Answers section. That is the "Support" section as it were. There is very little confusion in the naming of the existing fora sections or their descriptions - the "confusion" lies in the misreading or misunderstanding of their purpose/intent.
  21. So let me get this straight: You want Linden Lab to create a Region wherein the highest demand content one could encounter across the grid is placed .... So it can be used as a benchmark? Good luck getting enough content creators to agree to having their content hosted there - just for a start.
  22. Ah yes, pretending that each and every single response made is getting the same reaction no mater where it is ... Nope- it is in response to utter ridiculousness - this is not your personal Blog, it is not your in world Parcel. You have no say in what others see of you here, at all. Period. The same goes for in world, outside of IMs and such. Grow up and deal with it.
×
×
  • Create New...