KanryDrago

yes in which I said "Some choose to take offence too easily" which part are you struggling to understand here?

Then you misinterpreted my words. I never said to use forums things shouldn't annoy you. What I said was if you are easily triggered and it makes you cry then keep away. I wasn't crying about it I merely said put up or shut up. Nor do I get very often annoyed by things people say. There is no one on earth that doesn't get annoyed occasionally but that is a long long way from those claiming an emoji upsets them

Laughing at someone for having a stupid idea is not playing the man. It is directly linked to the idea they had and a response to the idea they had. 1:I think we should give everyone free owls!! 2:mansplainer Is playing the man not the ball 1: I think we should give everyone free owls!! 2: Laughs scornfully at you for having the idea to give everyone free owls the laugh is directly related to the idea not the fact that it is you and therefore not playing the man.

Did I claim I didn't ever take offence? claim I am a racist, sexist, paedo and yes like most people I will take offence at it . However my response was merely post something I have said that backs you up. My response was not to report the post

We have sorted that out now littleme, I read it a different way but Love and I discussed it

I didn't claim it did, I was merely pointing out its you saying we have to be sensitive about what others want and pointing out when it suited you to not be sensitive to others. Maybe you did drive some away who knows its an impossible thing to prove. It certainly moved some(where some is 1 or more) to just put you on block

hmmm weren't you asked by several people quite politely on a previous thread to stop posting religous style derails on threads and keep the faith based stuff to threads where the topic implied religion. Remind me what your response was? Oh yes you declined. So much for being sensitive to others.

Easily triggered people frankly should avoid forums as they are usually robust in their discussions or at least accept they will be triggered often.

Fair enough then, its not always easy to read intent from text. So apologies for the crossed wires

As I got the impression the post Luna made of the picture was a reply to my post I assumed yours naturally to be a follow up. Your caption mentions a he....of course I will assume its therefore aimed at me

Your definition said weak spots should be protected sorry I disagree that way you get people like a new hire we just got from university who bursts into tears if anyone disagrees with him. Perhaps we shouldn't by your definition and then implement what he is wrong about and let the company go to the wall when the software doesnt work properly? After all his weak spots need to be protected. Its all the safe space crap we hear about in universities that leads to people being like that

Love's post accusing me of being a mansplainer being a prime example, he didn't tackle what I said and disagree or dispute it he went straight to playing the man not the ball

Ah so I am not allowed to ask someone to provide proof of an accusation now? Guilty because your friend said so.....I am sure we can all get behind that sort of justice.

So you are accusing me of sexism, back it up with a quote or explain to the forum you were mistaken. Typical of you to aim for tarring the poster with some undeserved epithet rather than engaging with the argument but then its what the forum has come to expect from you

If my post is passed by a moderator then no it wasnt over the top. I consider anyone who gets upset at my posts which are fairly moderate too thin skinned for their own good.

At the end of the day offence is not given it is taken, some choose to take offence easily, some hardly take offence at all. I don't see it as my job to moderate what I say because someone with a thin skin might take offence, that is totally their problem. The only one who can say I pushed it too far is a moderator. If you find this forum frequently offend you then maybe the old adage "If you can't stand the heat get out of the kitchen" applies because most here aren't going to play by lowest common denominator rules about what is offensive

I didnt say they werent sold on mp hence why I said "I don't think most breedables get listed on the market usually" Please note the bolded word which implies that they can be but most seem to be sold elsewhere

Most breedables I have seen (note my knowledge is second hand from friends picked up in passing) seem to have stores or auctions dedicated to selling them in second life where afficianado's can go browse. Find those areas for your kitty cat things. I don't think breedables get listed on mp usually

SL will undoubtedly outlive Sansar, opensim and hi fi have been around quite a while and have failed to gain traction. The labs won't be closing down SL anytime soon as it still makes them a lot of money. The only thing that does as Sansar is a bottomless pit of money sucking

Because frankly when someone comes out with stupid idea's if you humour them in the least they will just keep coming back with more of the same. It is better by far to bring that to a halt from the outset. Any hint of kindness or taking it in the least seriously will be treated as an affirmation of the idea and before you know it we have people deciding pi is equal to 4 to make the calculations easier or making declarations that the rules of their country overrule the rules of mathematics. Both the sets of people only grew up to be able to do so because people were kind when they had stupid idea's as children rather than withering and smiting them with a righteous scorning

Did I claim they were?

This only becomes a problem if you start to believe it. A fool becomes wise when he recognises his ignorance and a wise man becomes a fool when he recognises his wisdom

hmmm this sounds a lot like one of those creation myths from heathen faiths, you should run it past certain forum posters maybe they will form a cult around your birth

To me at least stupidity implies the intelligence to know better but not applying it. Therefore calling someone stupid is not labelling them as below the line on the intelligence bell curve its kicking them for having sufficient intelligence to know better but not applying it. I also agree with Maddy that those below the bell midpoint often make up for it by being happy people, I certainly wouldn't use the epithet stupid to them

Perhaps stop believing your sl experience is the same as for the rest of us. You also claimed you never meet genuinely new people too I use voice more than 50% of the time and also meet new to sl people all the time. Maybe you need to expand your horizons