jujmental

Does this mean access to SL will be blocked? After all, there's more sex in SL than Playboy. © The Judge

LL won't do anything about it because you have the ability yourself to restrict Private Messages in the Privacy Settings of your Profile Feed to Friends Only, or could stop email notifications from your Profile Feeds entirely by changing the Notifications Settings. Or you could leave things the way they are and just become a whinging masochist. © The Judge

Perrie Juran wrote: LeeHere Absent wrote: I'm often told I sound like a loud and juvenile version of Elaine Benis from Seinfeld. When I sing I've been told I sound like a cross between Bob Dylan and a dieing dog. I sound like a cross between Richard Burton and Martin Luther King. But then, they're dead. © The Judge

Perrie Juran wrote: Davvek wrote: That's your problem..noone cares about people who leave negative comments. This is getting fun! What other problems and negative comments do you want people to read about? This must be a way to get a post count high. I see you've posted alot - impressive. But we do care about people who flood and SPAM the forum in violation of the community standards. Spamming, Solicitation and Advertising: Spamming is not allowed. This includes aggressive self-promotion. http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/Linden_Lab_Official:Community_Participation_Guidelines I could go through and show in detail where you have hi-jacked other peoples threads, thread after thread, as well as starting your own threads in inappropriate sub-forums to Spam us. You are no better than the people who Spam this Forum advertising for Mumbabwe Prostitutes. It's a wonder you haven't been RIC'd to oblivion. I think he's doing cheap research for an article on the ineffectiveness of low quality guerilla advertising. © The Judge

Davvek wrote: That's your problem..noone cares about people who leave negative comments. You obviously don't read the forums much . . . Actually, the fifth and sixth words in that sentence can probably be omitted. © The Judge

Davvek wrote: LOL..tough crowd as usual..small minds...try to be constructive not destructive..if your not a fan don't comment. Alot of SL people enjoy the quality product this group puts out. Do you need a Sub-Editor? Sorry, I'll rephrase that: You NEED a Sub-Editor! I presume that your rag is targeted at people like yourself, viz, illiterate, self-aggrandising idiots. © The Judge

Conifer Dada wrote: What is this 'Papa Tree' ? ) I don't know what that is about, but I do have a lava tree in my house. © The Judge

Why not make potential posters take a combined IQ/language test before they are allowed to post? Ah, that's right, there'd only be about a dozen of us here. © The Judge - who has had ZERO spam make it through to his maibox in the last five years, because he uses Bayesian filters.

Davvek wrote: The SLE seeks tireless journalists to deliver top-notch coverage to our SL community of residents. You will cover SL features and hard news. We need passionate professionals who will pitch unique stories and who are not afraid to tackle in-depth SL media events. Alternatively, you could do the lazy journo thing, and just post something in these forums asking for people to write about the funniest things that have happened to them in SL. And other in-depth top-notch contemporary coverage. © The Judge

You left out the one most often seen in this forum. Ad Feminem The reptile brain rationale: that is, an emotional argument outweighs reason. and of course there's the other popular one here. Anti-negative Discrimination The rose-tinted spectacles view: that is, if people weren't so mean, you'd be right. © The Judge

Ambrose Bierce got it right. FRIENDLESS, adj. Having no favors to bestow. Destitute of fortune. Addicted to utterance of truth and common sense. which is probably a result of: FRIENDSHIP, n. A ship big enough to carry two in fair weather, but only one in foul. © The Judge

Or maybe they're both right. After all, a cow might think that it is a living sentient being, whereas I see it as a potential steak sandwich. © The Judge

It's a real nuisance when you have as many Google accounts as I do! Well, I need one for each alt, a few more for the harem, and then there's those for avoiding the tax authorities . . . I have to carry a pilot's case just to keep all my Google Glass in! © The Judge

KarenMichelle Lane wrote: jujmental wrote: Ethics and morality have no relevance in law. Authority only exists within the ambit of the ability of authorities to exact effective punishment. You can do whatever you like, wherever you want to do it as long as: a) you don't get caught b) if you do get caught the authorities can't punish you, as you are outside their sphere of influence c) if you do get caught the authorities don't want to punish you, for whatever reasons d) if you do get caught and get punished, the punishment is insignificant to you. © The Judge Oh poo! I guess we have to depend on the Karma Police then. Remember though: Karma means you get what you deserve, but it does not mean you deserve what you get. © The Judge

Buck000f wrote: ILLITERATELY!!!!! FIFY! (Yes, that's self-referentially amusing, too) © The Judge

Ethics and morality have no relevance in law. Authority only exists within the ambit of the ability of authorities to exact effective punishment. You can do whatever you like, wherever you want to do it as long as: a) you don't get caught b) if you do get caught the authorities can't punish you, as you are outside their sphere of influence c) if you do get caught the authorities don't want to punish you, for whatever reasons d) if you do get caught and get punished, the punishment is insignificant to you. © The Judge

I believe that the comprehension and acceptance by others of most posts would be considerably improved by the expression of each explicit or implicit opinion being prefaced by the phrase "I believe". I believe that Dres is clearly stating HIS opinion, not demanding that you should concur with it, nor expecting you to perceive that it is factual, nor that it is even the majority view of a bunch of cognitively disadvantaged attention whores. I believe congratulations are in order Dres! © The Judge

In the context of this thread it may be of interest historically, and hypocritically, that LL systematically deletes posts which refer to incest, regardless of their relevance or humorous content - and offers warnings to posters despite there being nothing in the ToS or Guidelines which relates to something that is more legal - in the USA and globally - than under-age sex. © The Judge

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2013/11/08/google_patent_tattoo_a_mobe_microphone_on_your_throat/ © The Judge

Bree McMahon wrote: After hitting a freedie, I am offically cleaned out. On the charge of mistaking the letter d for the letter b: GUILTY Obiter Dicta: If you are ignorant of the differences between various letters of the alphabet it is not surprising that you are going to make errors in interacting with text based systems, some of which may require you to differentiate between Y and N. © The Judge

Dresden Ceriano wrote: ETA: I'm afraid I'll have to report you to the improper authorities. FIFY! © The Judge

wiked Anton wrote: My email get filled with up with hundreds of emails from community forums every day. On the charge of a ridiculous lack of understanding of the medium in which you voluntarily choose to participate: GUILTY Obiter Dicta: No sentence required; stupidity is its own punishment. © The Judge

Maelstrom Janus wrote: So this is why theyve been busily rewriting the tos Yep. © The Judge

On the charge of impersonating a Linden: GUILTY Obiter Dicta: In the context of trying to do something "kool" and failing magnificently, annoying considerable numbers of residents and amusing others. © The Judge

Perrie Juran wrote: we were hired to make (earn) money. So were the Joker's henchmen. © The Judge