Jump to content

Media Influence, Stereotypes, And RL/SL Comparisons


Luna Bliss
 Share

You are about to reply to a thread that has been inactive for 976 days.

Please take a moment to consider if this thread is worth bumping.

Recommended Posts

4 hours ago, Theresa Tennyson said:

So, around 14 times a day?

https://www.cdc.gov/media/releases/2018/p0118-smoking-rates-declining.html

Theresa Tennyson nods and smiles.

Of course...

Arielle nods, smiles and rolls her eyes at another who doesn't understand that if smoking is down, some other addictive substance is up to take its place.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Arielle Popstar said:

Arielle nods, smiles and rolls her eyes at another who doesn't understand that if smoking is down, some other addictive substance is up to take its place.

This might be true for you -- I believe it if you say it's so -- but research shows it is not true for everyone. There are plenty of people who quit smoking but do not develop any other addictive behavior. And so I wish you would stop speaking of it as if it's absolute enshrined truth, sent by God to mankind. 

We discussed this before -- the idea that there is something called an "addictive personality" is a myth, began and perpetuated by Alcoholics Anonymous. Addiction is complex and the causes are varied. There are various conditions (mental health conditions and/or specific brain structures) that are tied to higher rates of addiction, yes.

If you tell me that you have a tendency to become addicted to substances or experiences I can understand that, but the cause is due to your own unique makeup which creates this condition and not this phantom "addictive personality" you assign it to.

Edited by Luna Bliss
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Luna Bliss said:

This might be true for you -- I believe it if you say it's so -- but research shows it is not true for everyone. There are plenty of people who quit smoking but do not develop any other addictive behavior. And so I wish you would stop speaking of it as if it's absolute enshrined truth, sent by God to mankind. 

We discussed this before -- the idea that there is something called an "addictive personality" is a myth, began and perpetuated by Alcoholics Anonymous. Addiction is complex and the causes are varied. There are various conditions (mental health conditions and/or specific brain structures) that are tied to higher rates of addiction, yes.

If you tell me that you have a tendency to become addicted to substances or experiences I can understand that, but the cause is due to your own unique makeup which creates this condition and not this phantom "addictive personality" you assign it to.

In the context of my response to Theresa it was on a national level. Weren't you just mentioning about watching a documentary about the opioid crisis last week?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, Sam1 Bellisserian said:

um yes...actually probably more. He used to wake up and take a hit and go back to bed. Any other questions about that?

 

24 minutes ago, Sam1 Bellisserian said:

Heroin

 

14 minutes ago, Arielle Popstar said:

and crack

 

10 minutes ago, Rowan Amore said:

Some crack addicts use those little butane blow torches, too.  Yeah, not a fire hazard at all.

Here's the thing. None of those things are routinely done in crowded public spaces, on public transportation, while walking down the street or while driving down a road. When smoking was common and where you could do it was largely unregulated, people were routinely lighting over a dozen tiny fires all over town every day. 

  • Confused 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Theresa Tennyson said:

Here's the thing. None of those things are routinely done in crowded public spaces, on public transportation, while walking down the street or while driving down a road. When smoking was common and where you could do it was largely unregulated, people were routinely lighting over a dozen tiny fires all over town every day. 

I would blame the firebug/arsonists and is a reason why matches are harder to buy these days in Canada at least. They also started to put a fire retardant chemical in cigarettes too to prevent them from continuing to smolder while unattended, especially to prevent people dying in bed from falling asleep while smoking.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Theresa Tennyson said:

A careless smoker can kill a few hundred people in an evening.

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2000/08/000807064005.htm

 

11 minutes ago, Theresa Tennyson said:

 

 

 

Here's the thing. None of those things are routinely done in crowded public spaces, on public transportation, while walking down the street or while driving down a road. When smoking was common and where you could do it was largely unregulated, people were routinely lighting over a dozen tiny fires all over town every day. 

Don't change the goalpost.  Causing a fire in your home is completely different than lighting up walking down the street.  By the way, you can't smoke on public transportation.  How does me driving down the road, smoking, kill anyone?  Drunk drivers kill far more people yet drinking is still allowed.

Rowan wonders just what some people are smoking.

Edited by Rowan Amore
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Arielle Popstar said:

I would blame the firebug/arsonists 

I'm sure you would.

There's an interesting dynamic in these threads. Apparently nicotine is harmless, smoking is an anti-gateway drug that keeps people from freebasing cocaine, etc. 

For the record, I'm not the one saying to regulate portrayals of smoking, making it illegal, etc. I'm just responding to people who are defending smoking. If you want to say, "Yeah, smoking isn't great but I do it anyway. So what?" I'd have no problem with it.

But, yeah, it isn't great.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Rowan Amore said:

 

Don't change the goalpost.  Causing a fire in your home is completely different than lighting up walking down the street.  By the way, you can't smoke on public transportation.  How does me driving down the road, smoking, kill anyone?  Drunk drivers kill far more people yet drinking is still allowed.

Rowan wonders just what some people are smoking.

People do toss still burning butts out the window and set things on fire. Drought is one of the reasons I don't usually take cigs with me when I go to the grocery store or other local business. These days, I only smoke at home.

Edited by Silent Mistwalker
Link to comment
Share on other sites

In addition to natural causes of bushfires, many human-led factors influence its spread. While we only blame natural factors for wildfires, statistics have an entirely different story to tell. Nearly 50% of forest fires are caused by humans, and these are the results of campfires, burning debris, arson, or just plain recklessness. On top of everything, most of these human-led factors of wildfires are intentional as an act of invading the space of other creatures. This space is then used for farming, agriculture, residential, or commercial purposes

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Rowan Amore said:

And why there are ashtrays in cars.  I don't toss my butts out the window.  Careless handling of campfires also start many brushfires.    I'm in no way saying smoking is good.  I don't think anyone is.  

Speaking of ashtrays in cars, that is a disappearing option in an increasing number of newer vehicles. That is a result of the anti smoking brigade who thought it would reduce the temptation to smoke and but just created another problem with their supposed solution.

Edited by Arielle Popstar
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Rowan Amore said:

And why there are ashtrays in cars.  I don't toss my butts out the window.  Careless handling of campfires also start many brushfires.    I'm in no way saying smoking is good.  I don't think anyone is.  

New cars do not come with ashtrays. They haven't had ashtrays in over 10 years.

Edited by Silent Mistwalker
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Arielle Popstar said:

Speaking of ashtrays in cars, that is a disappearing option in an increasing number of newer vehicles. That is a result of the anti smoking brigade who thought it would reduce the temptation to smoke and but just created another problem with their supposed solution.

My mom's car has no ashtray.  The van we used to own didn't have one either.  We used one of those ashtrays that fit in the cup holder with a little hole in the top that snuffed out the cigarette.   I don't toss butts out the window or in my yard.   It's a nasty enough habit and I don't want to inflict it on anyone else.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You are about to reply to a thread that has been inactive for 976 days.

Please take a moment to consider if this thread is worth bumping.

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...