Kenbro Utu

Sounds like the op is referring t othe New Tax Policy where LL is requiring a 1099 form to be filed with them for accounts with certain transaction limits being achieved. Processing of credit will be suspended if you are required to file the forms and do not. If that is the case, it is not the LL TOS the OP is disagreeing with, it an IRS requirement.

Dillon Levenque wrote: Perrie Juran wrote: You do realise that this Thread is like THREE YEARS OLD? That may not be a winner but it should at least get an honorable mention. Three full years. It was as always nice to see Void (who's been gone almost that long) but I could have done without being reminded of the lovely Dogboat. What it should get honorable mention for is going to a 2nd page after being resurrected from a 3-year death...

I would settle for it working consistently in its present incarnation.

Pussycat Catnap wrote: Even if this were not April 1st and full of people who think they're being funny... Anyone who is fool enough to cancel an account to something because of something said on a third party unverified blog kind of deserves it, and really shouldn't be allowed online without supervision anyway. Amazing, absolutely no movement on the humor detection meter.

Now where did I put my Garrard turntable?

I couldn't think of a better day to introduce such a lofty and desparately needed change. :matte-motes-big-grin I think it is only appropriate that the first script everyone uses be addressed. touch_start integer Oh my number detected Hello Avatar!

CheriColette wrote: Ceka Cianci wrote: i looked all over and could not find any information on the last name i chose.. Me too...but then I have no last name, just two names rolled into one. I didnt realize that I would be given last name of 'Resident' for some things or I would have chosen a last name in the beginning. The reason you were given the last name "Resident" is they quit offering last names by the time you signed up, it was not something you could have "chosen" to do.

Ceka Cianci wrote: That was awesome! Getting the app.:matte-motes-sunglasses-3: For those running Android, check out LoopStack.

Don't hold your breath, that post was over a year ago. I doubt the place still even exists. A year in SL is a lifetime...

Perrie Juran wrote: Hrdtop75 Deluxe wrote: Looks like the Cheeseburger is flashing the cash. I was thinking a little bit about this 2 Billion Bananas. Palmer says it gives him much needed funding for R&D. So how much of it will he be contractually required to use for this purpose? In other words, he didn't just now earn 2 Billion, though I'd bet there is still a nice profit in it for him. I read it was 400 million now, the rest in stock, with an additional 300 million if a set goal is obtained.

Heart Brimmer wrote: ... if you don't hear from the owner of the bar soon, I would perhaps file a ticket with LL and see what they can do. Hope this helps. Perhaps a silly question, but are the owner of the "bar" and the owner of the "atm" one in the same?

Celestiall Nightfire wrote: Kenbro Utu wrote: Storm Clarence wrote: Pamela Galli wrote: No one in SL should be forced to do business with someone they dont want to. No business, unless it is a consultancy, should be permitted to refuse business to any SL resident, unless of course, they are known criminals i.e., copybotters. This ain't Arizona! And, it's pretty offensive to think this mind set prevails. What's next no gays; no blacks; no newbies; no NPIOF; no jews; no furries? Naw, just no tea baggers... Always interesting to see the various prejudices displayed. (Often, by those who eschew prejudice) Don't get too excited, it was just some offbeat humor...

Storm Clarence wrote: Pamela Galli wrote: No one in SL should be forced to do business with someone they dont want to. No business, unless it is a consultancy, should be permitted to refuse business to any SL resident, unless of course, they are known criminals i.e., copybotters. This ain't Arizona! And, it's pretty offensive to think this mind set prevails. What's next no gays; no blacks; no newbies; no NPIOF; no jews; no furries? Naw, just no tea baggers...

LoriLexa wrote: Before you do everything in the viewer that KarenMichelle mentions, you have to change that info in the actual SL account (log onto the SL website). Then once you do that, you go to the viewer and make all those adjustments. MP will be automatic Just exactly where in account settings can you choose your maturity ratings?

There is no payment plan, they expect it up front. That is not the only way to own a private region. If you find an individual selling their sim, you can purchase from them for their asking price, and a transfer must be arranged through LL for a fee, and then you become the owner of the sim with payment directly to LL each month for tier. Unless I am wrong, the sim can be renamed as part of the transfer.

MizzKittenzz wrote: I got better things to do, Unlike those who should be lining up to help you?

hazeonelove wrote: I really need a partner/manager. Word of warning. Use group roles to give this new partner/manager the control they need instead of making them a group owner. A group owner cannot be removed from a group even by another owner, once there they can only be removed by LL.

Here is a short blurb with a little backgound on OnLive.

Daniel Voyager wrote: It's not bad good news. FIFY

Well, it seems LL found a new way to get people to log in (that way) once just to see what it looks like, and then never log in (that way) again.

hazeonelove wrote: So are the previous requirements that were stated by Utu true? That I have to own a full sim first? I'm not saying it's not true. I'm just obviously misunderstanding something, somewhere. Go back and read again. I told you "Owner" is subjective. When you rent on a private island, it will state you as "Owner" in the General tab of About Land. It does not mean you actualy own it. Go to the Covenant tab to see who the real "Estate" and "Owner" names are.

hazeonelove wrote: Another silly question probably. But do the owners have to follow their own covenant? Or does it even matter since it's THEIR covenant, and it's mainly meant for the renters and or visitors? Because I've read a covenant made by one of the beaches, and a very bold and clear rule in their covenant is being broken, by them. Besides being subject to LL's TOS, Community Standards and Maturity Ratings, the owner of a private island is pretty much god of their domain. End of story.

hazeonelove wrote: Hmm... That seems like a lot. I didn't know a lot of this. I also didn't expect the owners of some beaches which are on homesteads, to also own full sims. I thought they just rented the homestead to hold their beach and that's it. But when I go to their parcel and region details, they ARE listed as the owners (or their group) and also have their own covenant. "Owner" is a very subjective term in SL as pertains to land. When you rent you are shown as owner on the General tab. Go to the same land, then click on the Covenant tab. Then look at Estate and Owner. This is who really owns the land and pays tier to LL.

hazeonelove wrote: I see. So explain the ownership requirements a little more please. You say I must own a full sim before I'm eligible to buy a homestead. Which would then make me the owner. So... That means I have to fully pay for a full sim first? Yes, you must be an owner of a full private sim before you can own a homestead. Edited to add, meaning your tier for the full sim being paid to LL, and then the tier for the subsequent homestead being paid to LL. Renting a homestead would almost be equivalent to exactly what I'm doing now. Just, bigger. But still have an owner over my head, dictating my rights. Correct. BTW, I mentioned about being a Premium member before owning mainland on the continents, but I failed to mention that you do not have to be Premium to own a private island, or to rent from someone who does own a private island. Just wanted to add that oversight.

hazeonelove wrote: But if I get a homestead in the same fashion, from the same owner (maybe), will I then be the owner of that homestead/region? Since I am the only tenant? And if so, would I make my own covenant? You will always just be a renter in all actuality. It is just that the owner is able to assign certain rights to you. You cannot change the convenant. The covenant is the contract between you and the private owner as to your actions while you are the tenant. You can decide who you will and will not allow on your land, and have certain abilities to restrict by group or individual, etc.