Sammy Huntsman

They would have to find another skin creator. It's common sense dude.

Are you a kid avi with attachable Genitalia? or you talking about an adult avi? You need to be specific.

Its common sense, if they don't login anymore. I think they are fine, but once they log in. They are required to update their avis, to stick to the policy.

Are you a child avatar? If you are, then creators are required to bake on undergarments in those regions.

I mean they do use real world models in video games. Good example is Stellar Blade, they scanned a Korean Models body, to create Eve.

The one that describes heights at specific points in age, does not best define a child avatar. As there adults that have pituitary issues or are shorter than the average adult. Also SL height is not 1:1 to RL height. Which basically what you are saying, is you want height standards and all adult avatars to be at a certain height. To be classified as an adult.

But those 3 bodies also have a 3rd party flat chest mod. And I mean you can get a reborn to be small, if you know what you are doing. And to answer your question, there is a body called tweenster, that is for tweens.

Can you also please update the policy to properly define what you guys define as a child avatar?

That is also why I made the comment, they need to have a clear and transparent definition of how they define child avatars.

I would want some transparency on what defines a child avatar to them.

Oh I get that, but there is really nothing you can do.

Also, Zooby stopped making Child avatars. Due to what came out.

But that is also entirely up to the owner of the region. It is their region they pay for it. They can make whatever rules they want.

That isn't a child avatar dude.

I think the person who does this to a child avi should be banned. There is no reason to derender clothing of anyone.

So you saying false report them? If that is the case, you are basically breaking TOS to falsely report them.

What don't you agree with exactly?

I don't see anything wrong with that, there are certain people that my relationships with them are only transactional. And I don't think that is a bad thing. I mean I also have relationships that are platonic and romantic and sexual. I feel that is very normal in us humans. Nothing to be frowned upon.

Oh I totally understand that, I lost it on someone in a post that took it over and basically invalidated and disregarded the personal experiences of addicts.

It's pretty simple really, we all have our brains and think in different ways. And yes people can be critical and disagree with certain points you make. That is fine, that is part of a healthy debate. If we all agreed with all of your points, or someone else's points. This forum would be boring. And I don't think they are harsh at all, they are direct, critical and honest. Again all part of a healthy discussion.

No crap, I hated how she was on this. Like oh I know you were an addict, but your point is moot cause I believe medical journals and basically clinical studies. Over that of the actual human experience.

So it's because I am not a "clinical" addict that my issues and points are moot eh? You are absolutely ignorant and delusional here. And yes you are actively derailing this thread Luna. And nice way to call us dumb. Oh here is Luna, who knows everything about addiction. Yet when confronted and told she is wrong, by people who are addicts, she actively gaslights and disregards them.

I'm just done with you Luna. You are being ridiculous and even ignorant and gaslighting people who went through it.

So my own experience is not valid, you just disregarded my experience, I mean sure I don't have an insight on addicts, but now you are gaslighting me. So I am done with this Luna, you are really getting on my nerves and I don't want to derail this thread anymore.

Pretty much. I mean at least they title it right, but make the thumbnail more catchy and add the topic you are diving into.