Pamela Galli Posted April 4, 2012 Share Posted April 4, 2012 Arwen, so far 147xxxx and up do not seem to be affected; we are trying to determine the approximate range of numbers, and add them to the JIRA. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Josh Susanto Posted April 4, 2012 Share Posted April 4, 2012 >September and October 2010 Thank you. Roughly the same period that would have been affected by DD problems had the rest of the failed deployment been allowed on 13 September 2011. Why am I not at all surprised by this coincidence? http://community.secondlife.com/t5/Merchants/Does-14xxxxx-expose-the-Malefactor/td-p/1468983 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arwen Serpente Posted April 4, 2012 Share Posted April 4, 2012 Let me do some homework to get a list (or at least partial) of my 14x range. Is there an easier way to do it than the "hover" method. Laughs, it's gonna take me forever to hover and copy! Edited to add: I did a quick look at the products I have in that range (2 groupings). They start at 1463585 and up (apparantly unaffected). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Argus Collingwood Posted April 4, 2012 Share Posted April 4, 2012 Arwen Serpente wrote: Let me do some homework to get a list (or at least partial) of my 14x range. Is there an easier way to do it than the "hover" method. Laughs, it's gonna take me forever to hover and copy! Edited to add: I did a quick look at the products I have in that range (2 groupings). They start at 1463585 and up (apparantly unaffected). Ok your listings jump from 1364484 [Angelfood] to 1463572 [braveheart] so on your sorted inventory listings [by date] if anything falls between those two, it might have an issue. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arwen Serpente Posted April 4, 2012 Share Posted April 4, 2012 laughs, thank you Argus, I may be able to make dresses, but my hovering skills leave something to be desired. No, there shouldn't be anything inbetween there. how did you do that? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Argus Collingwood Posted April 4, 2012 Share Posted April 4, 2012 Arwen Serpente wrote: laughs, thank you Argus, I may be able to make dresses, but my hovering skills leave something to be desired. No, there shouldn't be anything inbetween there. how did you do that? I wemt to your SLM store, sorted 96 items per page first then sorted by oldest date and they were on page 2;-) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pamela Galli Posted April 4, 2012 Share Posted April 4, 2012 Ooh smart -- #1473084 is my lowest in the 14xxxx set. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Argus Collingwood Posted April 4, 2012 Share Posted April 4, 2012 Pamela Galli wrote: Ooh smart -- #1473084 is my lowest in the 14xxxx set. So far the lowest number I have found in the series is 1402645, anyone got anything lower that is messed up? ETA found one lower but it is TMI and sort of funny 1402618 NSFW Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pamela Galli Posted April 4, 2012 Share Posted April 4, 2012 Argus Collingwood wrote: Pamela Galli wrote: Ooh smart -- #1473084 is my lowest in the 14xxxx set. So far the lowest number I have found in the series is 1402645, anyone got anything lower that is messed up? I have non messed up 1398435. So somewhere between that and 1463572 is where the mess begins and ends. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Josh Susanto Posted April 4, 2012 Share Posted April 4, 2012 What is that in actual calendar dates? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Medhue Simoni Posted April 4, 2012 Share Posted April 4, 2012 Ok, I just read that DD does not support no copy items. Is this right? If it is, that's fricken ridiculous. How the heck does LL release DD when it doesn't support no copy, and then say they will add it later? If it can be added later then it could have been added before the release. I don't sell many no copy items, but I know many other people that do. This has to be the most retarded thing I have ever seen a company do. Do they not understand their own permissions system. How do they work on something for a year that then a key part of the permissions system does not work? I'm totally dumbfounded by LL once again. Disregard this comment(Limited Quantity is not supported) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Josh Susanto Posted April 4, 2012 Share Posted April 4, 2012 >Ok, I just read that DD does not support no copy items. Is this right? If it is, that's fricken ridiculous. How the heck does LL release DD when it doesn't support no copy, and then say they will add it later? Now you're getting the picture. Did you also notice that the thread where I most recently explained why this stuff happens has totally disappeared without any explanation? OTOH, don't worry. I'm sure they'll start figuring out how to add that feature some time around 2 June. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Medhue Simoni Posted April 5, 2012 Share Posted April 5, 2012 I just did a test delivery on 1 of my no copy items, that has to be no copy, and it delivered with the correct permissions. Maybe it was because it was still boxed. So, now, why the heck does LL write in their own blog that no copy does not work? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arwen Serpente Posted April 5, 2012 Share Posted April 5, 2012 Medhue, the DD instructions are a little confusing on this "no copy" thing. It means "limited quantities" as in "no copy" for the Merchant, not the recipient. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Josh Susanto Posted April 5, 2012 Share Posted April 5, 2012 >So, now, why the heck does LL write in their own blog that no copy does not work? It's so that you'll get disgusted with the marketplace and move all your business back to the grid and pay more for land. You can pretty much just cut and paste that last sentence any time you need an explanation for anything that happens around here, henceforth. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sera Lok Posted April 5, 2012 Share Posted April 5, 2012 i missed the thread. darnit. no popcorn for me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Medhue Simoni Posted April 5, 2012 Share Posted April 5, 2012 I tell ya, it is frustrating to deal with people who can't name things correctly. No copy is an SL permission. Limited quantity is a Marketplace distinction. Sorry, I just don't get how 1 can be confused as the other, or why LL would even think of confusing the 2 labels. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dartagan Shepherd Posted April 5, 2012 Share Posted April 5, 2012 Sera Lok wrote: i missed the thread. darnit. no popcorn for me. It's fuzzy, something about numerology and a women of forum merchants calendar project. I think you qualified. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Argus Collingwood Posted April 5, 2012 Share Posted April 5, 2012 Dartagan Shepherd wrote: Sera Lok wrote: i missed the thread. darnit. no popcorn for me. It's fuzzy, something about numerology and a women of forum merchants calendar project. I think you qualified. Never worry about theory as long as the machinery does what it's supposed to do. Robert A. Heinlein Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dartagan Shepherd Posted April 5, 2012 Share Posted April 5, 2012 Argus Collingwood wrote: Dartagan Shepherd wrote: Sera Lok wrote: i missed the thread. darnit. no popcorn for me. It's fuzzy, something about numerology and a women of forum merchants calendar project. I think you qualified. Never worry about theory as long as the machinery does what it's supposed to do. Robert A. Heinlein Grok. For the sheer pleasure of being quoted back Heinlein and in honor of women forum merchants everywhere (and survival guide wisdom) I'm changing my signature. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sera Lok Posted April 5, 2012 Share Posted April 5, 2012 hm, well as long as we're not all on the same cycle, life will be just fine. ^^ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dartagan Shepherd Posted April 5, 2012 Share Posted April 5, 2012 Sera Lok wrote: hm, well as long as we're not all on the same cycle, life will be just fine. ^^ I really tried to stop, it's a weakness. "“Once a month, some women act like men act all the time." -- Robert A. Heinlein The unfortunate thing for men though is that supposedly women see more colors than men, which gives them a serious competitive advantage as merchants. Not that men have any sense of color generally speaking. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Argus Collingwood Posted April 5, 2012 Share Posted April 5, 2012 Dartagan Shepherd wrote: Argus Collingwood wrote: Dartagan Shepherd wrote: Sera Lok wrote: i missed the thread. darnit. no popcorn for me. It's fuzzy, something about numerology and a women of forum merchants calendar project. I think you qualified. Never worry about theory as long as the machinery does what it's supposed to do. Robert A. Heinlein Grok. For the sheer pleasure of being quoted back Heinlein and in honor of women forum merchants everywhere (and survival guide wisdom) I'm changing my signature. Very fitting:D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arwen Serpente Posted April 5, 2012 Share Posted April 5, 2012 Bump. Keep this thread on top. Update on https://jira.secondlife.com/browse/WEB-4596 Direct Delivery product purchase orders stuck in the Being Delivered State (Non Unicode products) Please take a look at what's happening on this JIRA - Please set it to "Watch" because the issue is growing and since it deals with the Financial transaction integrity of the MP, it is a serious issue to all of us. Edited to add: This is no longer just a Direct Delivery issue. The reports are also from Magic Box users. ~ Support is directing people to go to the JIRA to request payment for stuck orders (I've had some paid, others are sitting there unpaid). ~ There are now orders stuck "Queued" where Support tells the Merchant to contact the Buyer to file a Support Ticket (even though the Merchant has already filed a Support Ticket). ~ The "Delivery Partially Failed" Message is now (in some cases) being tied to delivery of product + refund for the Buyer (so, essentially the Buyer is getting the item for free). Support is directing the Merchant to contact the Buyer to request direct payment. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pamela Galli Posted April 5, 2012 Share Posted April 5, 2012 Support is worse than useless; they harm, not help. They should have been fired long ago. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Facebook
Instagram
Twitter
YouTube
Flickr
Recommended Posts
Please take a moment to consider if this thread is worth bumping.
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now