Jump to content
anonymousmouse2

What is second life?..

Recommended Posts

On 12/4/2019 at 9:01 AM, Beth Macbain said:

Why isn't the skin between my middle finger and index finger as sexually charged as my boobs?

Apparently its a brain-mapping thing.  Search phrase for your favorite search engine: Psychology Today "Neuroscientists establish breasts as sexual organs"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)
On 12/4/2019 at 7:01 AM, Beth Macbain said:

 

And in any case, it's just skin - or in your case fur, I suppose. And for all of us, when it comes to SL, it's just pixels. What makes one bit of skin more sexual than another? Why isn't the skin between my middle finger and index finger as sexually charged as my boobs? Boobs are for feeding children. Who cares if they're hanging out or not? 

 

There is another big reason for the difference.  The skin between your index and middle finger are not "responsive"  that is swelling/engorging with blood during sexual arousal.  The breasts (nipples), the genitalia - male and female, do "respond " to stimulation and arousal.  These are the places usually kept covered.  It is not just social mores, but due to physiology that make an area of the body "sexual".  Yes,  there are dual purposes to the organs such as feeding an infant, urinating, but that doesn't change that they are also "sexually responsive".

Edited by Llarik Quinnell
didn't post my comment

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, Llarik Quinnell said:

There is another big reason for the difference.  The skin between your index and middle finger are not "responsive"  that is swelling/engorging with blood during sexual arousal.  The breasts (nipples), the genitalia - male and female, do "respond " to stimulation and arousal.  These are the places usually kept covered.  It is not just social mores, but due to physiology that make an area of the body "sexual".  Yes,  there are dual purposes to the organs such as feeding an infant, urinating, but that doesn't change that they are also "sexually responsive".

The ears respond to touch and sexual arousal too, let's hide them! And ever been touched on the inner thigh? Let's ban shorts! I can keep going on about other body parts like the feet, the neck, the back, etc. but in the end the only reason why anyone would think that the female nipple is something indecent which should be hidden, is because they were arbitrarily taught to believe that.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...