Jump to content

Satellite connection


You are about to reply to a thread that has been inactive for 253 days.

Please take a moment to consider if this thread is worth bumping.

Recommended Posts

I used Hughes internet with SL from 2006 - 2009.

It used a 2 watt LNB and latency was about 0.25 seconds on avg.

I used it because at the time, dial-up was my only other "broadband".

I had to deal with a 250MB daily download limit and later, low speeds during prime time hours because Hughes started catering to other markets and shafted their internet users.

Today, I would hope latency has improved, but the nature of satellite tells me it won't be by much.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You should be able to use satellite. While it is fast, it has the issue of latency, which means requests may take a few seconds to initialize, but the stream will overall be fast. A good way to explain this:

  High speed Low speed
Line based Fast and responsive Slow but responsive
Satellite based Fast but delayed Slow and delayed

So while assets may download fast, you will likely experience a larger than usual delay, imagine pressing "w" on a line based connection and you moving instantly, but pressing "w" on a satellite connection and you move about maybe 0.4 to 0.6 seconds later.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Chaser Zaks said:

You should be able to use satellite. While it is fast, it has the issue of latency, which means requests may take a few seconds to initialize, but the stream will overall be fast. A good way to explain this:

  High speed Low speed
Line based Fast and responsive Slow but responsive
Satellite based Fast but delayed Slow and delayed

So while assets may download fast, you will likely experience a larger than usual delay, imagine pressing "w" on a line based connection and you moving instantly, but pressing "w" on a satellite connection and you move about maybe 0.4 to 0.6 seconds later.

Is satellite effected by weather?  I know whenever it rained badly at my sister's, it would go down.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, RowanMinx said:

Is satellite effected by weather?  I know whenever it rained badly at my sister's, it would go down.

Yes, we still have satellite TV where I live, and if the weather gets bad enough, it can cause issues. But technology is a lot better than it used to be, I remember when a slight rain storm would cause the TV to go out. It would take really severe rain filled clouds to take out the signal.

As for internet, I'd say some corrupt packets may occur during any form of non-clear weather, but those would mostly either get corrected or re-sent without the user even noticing.

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Candi Clawtooth said:

If I have satellite for my internet provider will I be able to use Secondlife??

 

In my experience, I was up in the mountains of Montana with only a satellite connection and no cell service what so ever. You are only allowed so much data on them during the day but after 1 am I believe it is free until I think 7am... Anyway, my experience with it was that I could connect but nothing would rez and if i dared to go to a event.. instant crash..

So, yes you can run SL however it will eat up your data allotment and you will be VERY, VERY slow to load and lag horribly.

This is from personal experience with hughesnet

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, rain, rain clouds & snow always cut out my connection. During the 2006 - 2009 years SL was such an addiction, I'd take the chance of falling off the roof and dying to wipe the lense on the satellite LNB of any rain droplets or snow build up until I made an access hole through a window an A/C unit occupied and used a long pole with a rag attached to the end to do it safetly. Those were the days...

Yeah, Hughes used to allow unlimited downloading between 2am and 5am (can't remember which TZ I was offsetting), but then when they started catering to other markets, that went away too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 years later...

This is an old thread, but my experience with Starlink may still be of interest to some.

I have now been connecting to Second Life via Starlink for 6+  months, from Auckland,  New Zealand.  Subjectively, I rate the performance as excellent.

My system:  64Gb ram, Nvidia 3080Ti 12Gb, 4k Screen.  Running Linux Mint Cinnamon 20.3,  Firestorm (Linux) viewer x64 6.6.14.69596 .

I had my first glitch yesterday, login failed with the error message "Despite our best attempts......".  General web surfing (Firefox) was not affected.

An older Win10 machine reported the same failure.

I de-powered both the dish and the router for about 2 minutes, then restarted. Problem fixed.

I use Ethernet cable, not WiFi.

Below is a typical Starlink performance report, latency typically 20-35ms;  DL speed is very variable,  0.5 to 50+ Mbps, 10-30 Mbps is typical.

Starlink stats on SL 17aug23.jpg

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Satellite or Starlink?

I would say that regular Satellite latency is going to be too high to be tolerable in SL, SL does cope with high pings though since it's not really something where you need to react fast but lag is lag and above 300ms things get a bit annoying.

That said: the location of SL's sim servers means relatively high latency is just normal for everyone outside of the US using SL and it's not really an issue, it's just that satellite will make that 600-700ms (or frequently more) instead of the approx 200ms we outside of the US experience.

If you're in an area where satellite internet is a thing you would probably want to look at Starlink as an alternative, much different technology with much lower latency.

 

edit: damnit old thread!

 

Edited by AmeliaJ08
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You are about to reply to a thread that has been inactive for 253 days.

Please take a moment to consider if this thread is worth bumping.

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...