Jump to content

Dresden Ceriano

Advisor
  • Posts

    5,201
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Dresden Ceriano

  1. Ceka Cianci wrote: I have a routine for the ones that keep digging past ice breaker stage... Them:Where are you from? Ceka: The states Them:Really? where in the states? Ceka:The south. Them: Oh really,what state? Ceka:Are you wanting to stop by for a visit or something? Me: Yeah, sure... what's for dinner? ...Dres
  2. CeLlne wrote: Based on personal experience, after having my age up in my profile, less people message me for adult stuff. People don't flirt with me when they talk to me. Of course that comes with a drawback of being treated condescendingly. It's easier to know who to report if I have my age up, because then if someone still message me with adult stuffs even after knowing how old I am, I can just block and report them right away without having to go through "Sorry, I'm 16, I'm not interested in these things. No I'm not RPing as 16, I'm really 16 in RL How were you supposed to know my age since I don't have that information publicly available on my profile or in chat 24/7? Oh well, you were just supposed to magically know that I am a minor based on my teen avi and that you're not supposed to send me IMs about adult stuffs." Sweety, I'm not trying to give you a hard time. I'm honestly concerned about your well-being. I want you to understand that not everyone regards an underage person as being off limits. Yes, most people will refrain from hitting on you or exposing you to any sort of "adult stuff" if they know you're underage... those are not the ones about whom you need to worry. There are a certain class of people who could see your age in your profile and, rather than disregard you because of it, will instead target you for that very reason. They might very well be the sort of person who would, rather than flirt with you or IM you for adult stuff, wish to befriend you and gain your trust in hopes that one day you might let down your guard. Think about it... while you can't necessarily avoid becoming ensnared by an evil individual such as that, the least you can do is stop advertizing your vulnerability to every evil individual who comes along. I'm not trying to scare you... I just want you and every young person, to understand that exposing too much of yourselves can be very dangerous, whether it be in SL or on Facebook or whatever. Just think of it as, "The less they know, the better." Please, be careful. ...Dres
  3. CeLlne wrote: The reason I display my age, being a minor, is to prevent people from sending me adult messages or attempting to hit on me. It's what the people in the help area suggested when I first joined. Also, when I get on voice, people can pretty much determine how old I am. I can almost understand why those people gave you that advice, but in reality, I believe it does you more harm than good to be so open about your age. Yes, some people might hit on you or send you adult messages (whatever that means), but those sort of advances are easily curtailed by instantly blocking that person once they've stepped out of line. I sincerely hope that, even at your age, you'd be mature enough to handle that type of situation should it arise. If not, then you simply shouldn't be participating in as open a virtual environment such as SL. Declaring your status as a minor will not protect you and could very well make you a target, which it seems to have already done. ...Dres
  4. I don't get it... why on earth are you telling anyone how old you are? Just stop. Stop and you'll stop being treated like a pariah and accused of ridiculous nonsense. Not only that, but keeping that sort of information to yourself would actually protect you from nefarious individuals who might seek to take advantage of someone they perceive as being young and naive. There's a reason why the purveyors of Second Life chose not to publicly disclose the accounts which belong to those users who are under eighteen. I suggest you take a cue from them and stop self-disclosing that very fact. ...Dres
  5. LlazarusLlong wrote: If someone asks me a real life question I generally respond by asking them what colour (color) knickers (panties) they are wearing. Well, fair's fair! Black, crotchless... with a zipper in the back. ...Dres *thought about asking you a real life question, then decided he'd rather you remain an enigma*
  6. >2 ...Dres (Do you love me now?)
  7. Syo Emerald wrote: My main problem with calling SL a game is not so much a problem of definitions, but more a problem of the approch that follows such a statement. In my experiance people who call SL a game are either griefers, who refuse to feel any guilt when they destroy what others create, steal and harasse. Because...you know, its just a game. :smileyfrustrated: Or they are lazy and spoiled as f... They come to the forum (if they find it) and rant about how they hate that it doesn't run as smooth as a regular AAA game, how theres nothing to do here, how its too complicated and they actually have to use their brain and how unfair it is, that they have to pay for stuff. And last but not least its a term usually followed by insulting those who are residents here and dare to get upset about things here. The "get a real life" insult. I believe that this is the most accurate (not to mention honest) answer which has been given to Gadget's question so far in this thread. The problem I have with it is that not everyone who refers to SL as game has these unfortunate types of attitudes. I understand why some would consider those who do to be, if not actually offensive, aggravating as hell. But it's those attitudes which cause the problems, not the act of referring to SL as a game. I believe that those who automatically condemn people who use the word game in reference to SL are acting rather prejudicially and would benefit greatly from reserving their vitriol for only those who truly deserve it. ...Dres
  8. Madelaine McMasters wrote: TDD123 wrote: Of course he isn't. But he's indeed bigger, right ? Though I'd thought you'd like Leslie more for her voice instead of better proportion ..:robothappy: I like both Al and Leslie, but Leslie's a better role model for an aspiring lesbian. ;-). I'm thinking that has nothing to do with the length of their fingernails. ...Dres
  9. TDD123 wrote: Dresden Ceriano wrote: TDD123 wrote: LlazarusLlong wrote: No, that's not another name for cunnilingus. Couldn't resist the role of being a cunning linguist, could you ? Some things just come naturally. ...Dres Somehow I cannot imagine you cunningly have your way with linquistics while cunnilinging. :robotindifferent: Me?... of course not. I gave that sort of behavior up years ago. ...Dres
  10. TDD123 wrote: LlazarusLlong wrote: No, that's not another name for cunnilingus. Couldn't resist the role of being a cunning linguist, could you ? Some things just come naturally. ...Dres
  11. LlazarusLlong wrote: Ceka Cianci wrote: I thought Gor was people eating each other N stuff. That's "Vore." Short for "vorarephilia". Dolcett is when you eat your female meat spit-roasted. All part and parcel of gynophagia. No, that's not another name for cunnilingus. Which is not the second Irish airline. Oh yeah, you're right... I forgot about vore. And, looking back on what Ceka said, vore fits her description much better. Whereas, gore is a more general term which can encompass various, more specific activities, such as vore, dolcett, snuff, etc... (which can all be rather gory, depending on how they're done). If I remember correctly, there are two types of vore, soft and hard. Soft meaning swallowing a body whole and hard meaning, well, chewing it up first I suppose... which would certainly fall into category of gore. So, it's quite possible for a person to be into vore and not necessarily gore... but nevertheless, Gor is something else entirely and shouldn't be confused with either. ...Dres
  12. Work through each of the steps on this page... link. It was written for the Firestorm viewer, but applies to them all. ...Dres
  13. Ceka Cianci wrote: I thought Gor was people eating each other N stuff. It doesn't take long to fall out of the loop around here does it? At first i thought it was Gorean,then someone tells me no,it means like Gory and eating someones body and gross stuff like that.. Now it's back to what i first thought it was.. Hehehehe What the person who told you that was probably talking about is called gore, which is not at all the same as Gor... although, I suppose the two could be combined if one were so inclined. ...Dres (Regardless of what claims to the contrary one makes, spelling does matter.)
  14. KingVampilicious Rhapsody wrote: It had to do something with for she doesn't spend all her L's like alot of people would do if they have access to them. Are you kidding me? Don't you realize that you're making yourself responsible for the safe keeping of someone else's money? In other words, should something happen with their funds, you would be the one holding the bag. And, not only that, you're also enabling your friend by facilitating her fiscal irresponsibility. If I were you, I'd end this arrangement post haste... actually, I'd have never gotten into such a lopsided arrangement in the first place. ...Dres
  15. JamieThunder wrote: Others may get indignant with the OP but I get what he says. If he got you all upset thenmaybe it hit close to home. I catch flak for the RL pic I have of myself on my profile. Early 20, s though I look a few years younger. Many is the time while out clubbing I get an im from some middleaged aged daft cow resentful for the fact that I have a pic posted.95% of the time THEY don, t have one on theirs (go figure) yet they show their resentment . Its kind of obvious the type, the BARBIE avis in thigh high boots, halter tops and cut offs. WELL huns I could care less, I eat right, exercise and take care of myself . Not everyone on here is old, just as many who like myself are youngerso don, t be butthurt over men OR women that choose to care for their health and appearance. Just as it was suggested not to look at the pic he finds a Turnoff if someones pic makes you rentful then keep your anger to yourself because no one is going to remove their pic because someone feels inadequate . Oh, my heart bleeds over the terrible treatment which the young and the fit receive from the general public. Why can't they ever be exhibited the same sort of respect and admiration with which society showers middle-aged, daft cows? ...Dres *cries*
  16. LlazarusLlong wrote: Nuke Ungren. That'll solve the problem. But, how do you expect them to get a nuclear bomb working with scripts disabled? Such a sad situation. ...Dres *cries*
  17. SweetLadyMell wrote: @ Prierre - was that the one with 'the late' Robbin Williams? His name was Robin Williams and that song was Bobbie MacFerrin, not Bob Marley... but, otherwise, yes. But, Bob Marley did do Three Little Birds, which also states not to worry... ...Dres
  18. I see no reason why a child with a Native American parent couldn't have red hair and green eyes. Genetics are strange... it's very possible that red hair and blues eyes could come about with neither parent having been endowed with those attributes, simply because, somewhere down the line of their ancestry, someone with whom their ancestors bore offspring had those genetic traits. Regardless, in Second Life, genetics plays no part and you can create any sort of character you wish.. even a red-haired, green-eyed Native American. ...Dres
  19. How very selfish of you to wish upon a complete stranger denial of the knowledge of how good your meat really is. ...Dres
  20. Quite frankly, what that mother is teaching her child disgusts me... “We’ve always told her that inevitably there would come a day when she would be discriminated against for her faith but we never thought Disney would be the source,” she said. This is the sort of person who believes that when someone refuses to let some group of religious lunatics control how they choose to live their lives (as in, when they have a child or who they can marry), it's those supposed heathens who're being discriminatory... when it's actually the other way around. The last thing this world needs is another child being raised to brandish a disingenuous, self-imposed victimization mentality. ...Dres
  21. Saraya Starr wrote: Speaking for myself if a DJ didn't talk at all I would not even go to see him/her. I find this to be a very strange attitude. I simply don't understand why anyone would think that, on a platform such as SL, using voice is the only acceptable way of interacting with an audience. I'm in agreement with Kelli, in that local chat can also be used to great effect in that regard. Personally, I prefer this approach, simply because there's absolutely no chance for a DJ to encroach upon the main reason why I go to such events... to enjoy the music and interaction with others who are attending for the same purpose. Now, I don't mind DJs who voice between tracks, as long as the emphasis is on the music and not the personality of the DJ. Talking over songs, especially the lame attempts some DJs make at inserting supposedly witty comments over the music right in the middle of a track, I find to be extremely irritating, making it highly unlikely that I would ever seek out those who do such things in the future. But I don't necessarily, actively avoid them either... as long as the music is good and I'm in pleasant company, I can deal with it. ...Dres
  22. msbluerasp wrote: I feel so honored that ppl would take their personal time to post and call me self centered! LOL And I feel honored that someone would take their personal time to IM me and call me a nut. ...Dres *has been called much worse by much better*
  23. Randall Ahren wrote: There's nothing wrong with wanting a contest buddy and going to contests and voting for each other. I used to do that with one of my friends and it was fun. I hope you find her. You're right... but then, no one said that was wrong. ...Dres
  24. That is exactly the type of selfcenteredness of which I speak, but coupled with either being too lazy to go through the trouble of actually cheating or simply refusing to take that step in order to justify their, otherwise, just as selfish actions, if only to themselves. I just can't imagine the OP is the type of person who'd really do such a thing. ...Dres
  25. msbluerasp wrote: My girlfriend and I used to go to dance contests all day and the money added up. She hasn't been online for a while, and I'm starting to get low on funds. If you'd like to go to contests and we can vote for each other, make a little cash, IM me in world. Ideal person would stay for the whole contest, not just teleport in to vote. Oona You can't possibly be making all that much money by doing this. Personally, after tipping the DJ and the host and the venue, I'm usually in the black, even if I'm lucky enough to win something. And that's not counting the money it usually takes me to dress myself in an outfit befitting the given theme of an event. I mean, it couldn't be that you're one of those stingy, selfish persons who thinks those types of events are thrown for the sole purpose of providing you an income, rather than those who actually work to create an enjoyable experience for their patrons.... correct? No, I think not... no one could possibly be that self-centered. ...Dres
×
×
  • Create New...