Arkady Arkright

Real Men use dock leaves.

It's a *virtual* world - no concepts have any validity, that's the whole point.

"need a kind" what ?

JegStiger wrote: Ohmygoditgoesonforever... Paragraphs

Be interesting to know if his ancestors were Mayan...

Must play havoc with stock rotation, I hope they don't do it with perishables...

Harley Hynes wrote: I am getitng tired of loggingin everyday and having random people IM me and tell me i have Alts . "Random people" ?? you mean complete strangers who for no reason whatsoever take the trouble to IM you out of the blue and tell you they know you have alts ? There's something not quite right about this complaint...

Storm Clarence wrote: Arkady Arkright wrote: Krystina Ferraris wrote: He is however a pompous jerk who hides behind "freedom of speech". Seeing that he's declared himself an 'Enemy Of The State' to avoid answering rape allegations in another state... FIFY That is quite blatantly and deliberately untrue - so, par for the course...

Krystina Ferraris wrote: He is however a pompous jerk who hides behind "freedom of speech". Seeing that he's been declared an 'Enemy Of The State' by a country that assumes for itself the right to kill anyone, anywhere in the world, without judicial oversight, I'd say he has every reason to hide behind something.

Darkness Anubis wrote: /derail Arkady your sig line has given me a heck of an idea for the name of a mesh clothing business. "do not fold spindle or mutilate" given some of the wierd wild distortions you can get when making rigged mesh that is SOOOOOOOOOO appropos! /end derail Feel free, I nicked it off some official form in the first place...

So I was right, you did fit in perfectly - and got exactly what you deserved... To others here, lest you believe this claptrap - I've never seen a thread on SLU defending paedophilia, I don't think any poster doing so would last very long over there, frankly.

JeanneAnne wrote: the fantasy reality is in your head Charolotte .. how much did you get for your soul? im not going away .. why dont you? Jeanne I think you'd fit right in on SLU...

Jo Yardley wrote: I don't know anyone who has bandwith limits on their internet, I guess that has to do with where you live in the world. Quite common in the UK. My limit is 50Gb/month - not normally a problem, but with this bug I could use that in a week, and end up having to pay for all the extra Gb I've used at the end of the month (without knowing I'd used them until the bill arrived).

I'm sorry, but I can't find any proof or sense in anything you say, it's just made-up mumbo-jumbo in an attempt to bamboozle others into thinking you know what you're talking about.

16 wrote: assertion: there is no God Assertion: there is a god. Assertion: there are many gods. Assertion, we live on a flat disc disc on the back of four elephants, who are in turn on the back of a giant turtle. Assertion: the tooth fairy exists. ... Anyone can play that game, it is meaningless.

16 wrote: try the Oxford dictionary + noun a statement or proposition which is regarded as being established, accepted, or self-evidently true: - the axiom that sport builds character - chiefly Mathematics a statement or proposition on which an abstractly defined structure is based. + you mixing up your axioms and your assertions You pick your dictionary, I'll pick mine... If I don't believe your axiom to be true, then to me it isn't an axiom, merely an assertion.

16 wrote: Arkady Arkright wrote: 16 wrote: the nature of religious truths What is a 'religious truth' ? How does it differ from any other 'truth' ? Truth is simply a hypothesis supported by evidence. Anything else is mere supposition - how can there be a serious field of study of such a nebulous thing ? religious truths the word truths is used as a polite form by scholars and academics and scientists in all kinds of fields. has to do with the search for truth. in the search for truth any untruths discovered are a by-product of the search. some people like to concentrate solely on discovering untruths. is way more tho who prefer not to limit themselves in this way axiom/rule 1: there is a God axiom/rule 2: the Bible is the Word of God axiom/rule 1: there is a God axiom/rule 2: the Bible is not the Word of God (so is irrelevant to what we do know about what God knows. we know nothing) axiom/rule 1: there is a God axiom/rule 2: i have a direct phone to God that no one else can see or listen in on Axiom: A proposition assumed to be true {my bold} ref: (http://thesaurus.yourdictionary.com) And that's where the whole religion thing fails - there is no logical reason to assume any of these axioms is correct, it's all a matter of opinion (and indoctrination). 16 wrote: personal like to think about these kinds of things and try to figure them out Me too.

16 wrote: looks like you maybe missed the point again. but is ok Nope - my point is : 16 wrote: the nature of religious truths What is a 'religious truth' ? How does it differ from any other 'truth' ? Truth is simply a hypothesis supported by evidence. Anything else is mere supposition - how can there be a serious field of study of such a nebulous thing ?

16 wrote: why is it on the interwebz that whenever there is a debate about theology someone comes along and wants scientific evidence of a theological statement Because without real provable evidence it's just your opinion - no more or less valid than anyone else's baseless assumptions. 16 wrote: i take it that you do know the difference between theology and science. Yes - theology is a set of fables designed to enslave otherwise free minds, whereas science is an attempt to describe the world as it is, not as whoever indoctrinated the 'believer' wishes it to be.

16 wrote: Genesis 3:22 : "And the LORD God said, Behold, the man is become as one of us, to know good and evil." this the fundamental tenet of 3 of the greatest religions ever. don't know why when people who are followers of these seems to wants to make other reasons for why we might do the things we do. God didnt. he put the question to Man and Man choose to accept I take it you can prove that claim, with scientific evidence ? otherwise it's just another hypothesis...

JulesMatriarchy wrote: I hereby propose the following amendments to the SL TOS. It should be forbidden to: I hereby propose the following amendment to the SL Forum TOS. It should be forbidden to: create forum alts for the express purpose of trolling.

Ingrim wrote: why is this "Game" so boring? theres litterally nothing to do in it. no goals, nothing. its completely pointless. It's not the game's fault that you don't have the imagination to set your own goals and challenges...

Peggy Paperdoll wrote: LL have acknowledged there's a problem affecting many users, you seem to be the only who doesn't believe them...

leon Bowler wrote: Please look at the ideAnd if not say why, that is all, no need to get upset by it, it is a simple idea try to stick to that. Any room for Phlogiston in this theory of yours ?

I may have missed it but where, in that monstrous wall-of-text, is there any discussion of 'freedom of religion' in SL ? To my eyes, you're just another fundamentalist nut-job looking for an outlet for to push your personal delusions. Please take it elsewhere.