Arkady Arkright

Domitan Redenblack wrote:Assume freeloaders would get 300Kbps only. Define 'freeloaders' ? are you assuming that non-Premium accounts never spend anything in SL ?

I've just TP'd into 'smith' via the map, and you do end up underwater at '128,128,3' - but you should be able to see the seabed underneath your feet.

Suspiria Finucane wrote: Either Amanda Linden is right, and forum activities can not lead to an in-world ban, or the Standards are right, and forum behaviour can lead to a ban in the Second Life virtual world. Which is the case, please ? Quote from today's meeting. [2011/03/10 13:51] Amanda Linden: no appeals. 3 warnings and it's a one week ban. [2011/03/10 13:51] Amanda Linden: and it's only for community platform, not for SL Thanks Suspiria, I'll regard that answer as being from the horse's mouth (not that I'm calling either you or Amanda a horse, btw :smileytongue:) Cato &

I request clarification of an inconsistency in Linden Lab statements concerning in-world bans for forum misbehaviour. In the recent Blog thread "Improving our Lines of Communication with the Community" I posted the following :- by Honored Resident Arkady Arkright on 02-10-2011 12:54 PM While reading the different comments to this post I found many opinions that I share. To name the two most important ones: 1. New guidlines for posting means LL threatens residents who don't follow the "party line" to get banned in SL. The failure to respond to the many times this p

It also helps if they discuss the actual issue in a civil and constructive way rather than competing to see who can come up with the most insidious interpretation of our motives, Could I just point out that a motive having an insidious interpretation does not necessarily prove that it's an incorrect interpretation...

WolfBaginski/Master/Han/Setekh/Arkady/Mike and others that had questions about bans - As the Community Participation Guidelines say, we moderate at our discretion. This policy only applies to the community platform (not inworld) and other communication channels outlined specifically in the policy. However, you will receive warnings before a ban from the Community Platform is in place. A community platform ban may be for a day, week, month, or longer--depending on how many offenses have been committed. I will share more details regarding our moderation procedure when the new platform i

While reading the different comments to this post I found many opinions that I share. To name the two most important ones: New guidlines for posting means LL threatens residents who don't follow the "party line" to get banned in SL. The failure to respond to the many times this point has been raised in this blog speaks volumes about the real intention of these changes ... I don't mean to sound flip, but what exactly is it that has changed between the old guidelines and the new guidelines to make you think there is now a codified policy to threaten residents who don't follow the party line?

While reading the different comments to this post I found many opinions that I share. To name the two most important ones: New guidlines for posting means LL threatens residents who don't follow the "party line" to get banned in SL.The failure to respond to the many times this point has been raised in this blog speaks volumes about the real intention of these changes ...

I want to know if forum and blog posts that are critical of Linden Lab and Linden Lab policies are now going to begin to earn in-world bans. Can we have an answer to this please Amanda ? Just how freely can we speak without putting our personal investments in SL at risk ?

I have a doubt about the new Community Participation Guidelines Spamming, Solicitation and Advertising: ...Do not reference other websites offering any product or service. What is the exact sense of "Do not reference other websites offering any product or service"? Can I reference websites (forums, blogs, web pages...) with some commercial goals but also with tutorials, help threads, forums...? Can I reference SLU as an alternative when your forum moderators are once again censoring valid discussions for no good reason ?