Name the things you DON'T want LL to implement...as this is what we DO get.

[Faithless Babii]

I dont want LL to let new residents know they have a choice to have a home an NOT be a premium member, and especially, I wouldnt want them to let the cat out of the bag that you can rent a really nice home privately, and that a Linden home wasnt the only option.

[Ilyra Chardin]

---

Anaiya Arnold wrote:

I don't want LL to move rather than delist our items if we wrongly categorize a tiny percentage of items on an infrequent and obviously unintentional basis.

I don't want LL to inform us automatically which category a delisted item should go in either.  They should waste our time and their's making us send in a support ticket to get this information.  It's more educational that way.

---

ROFL!

Great post

[Rya Nitely]

When I hit Update after editing an item DON'T take me to my new/revised listing, but let me search for it myself.

 

[Marcus Hancroft]

---

Rya Nitely wrote:

When I hit Update after editing an item DON'T take me to my new/revised listing, but let me search for it myself.

 

---

Here, here!  

/me raises his hand on this one also!

Don't do this, Linden Lab!  We'd just absolutely HATE it if you did!  

LMAO!

[Perrie Juran]

Don't fix the Marketplace so it remembers my search preferences in the layout,  number of items per page, list or gallery view, etc.

Don't show me my recently viewed items so if I don't bookmark them I have to search all over again for them.

 

[Ilyra Chardin]

---

Marcus Hancroft wrote:

---

Rya Nitely wrote:

When I hit Update after editing an item DON'T take me to my new/revised listing, but let me search for it myself.

 

---

Here, here!  

/me raises his hand on this one also!

Don't do this, Linden Lab!  We'd just absolutely HATE it if you did!  

LMAO!

---

I'm in on this, too.  It's a major pet peeve of mine as well. 

[Josh Susanto]

I do NOT want all Linden Labs employees evaluated for possible psychopathy.

 

[Pamela Galli]

And please, LL, DON'T throw me in that Briar Patch! 

[Anaiya Arnold]

---

Marcus Hancroft wrote:

---

Rya Nitely wrote:

When I hit Update after editing an item DON'T take me to my new/revised listing, but let me search for it myself.

 

---

Here, here!  

/me raises his hand on this one also!

Don't do this, Linden Lab!  We'd just absolutely HATE it if you did!  

LMAO!

---

It would be awful.  I'd save so much time, I'd have to find another hobby.  I would not mind so much but I already have a cat.

I'd hate it even more if instead of having a box that looks like the ones that lets you type a number in to navigate to another page, they had a box that actually lets you type a number in to navigate to that page. 

 

[Tiffy Vella]

Please never do these things, LL...

DON'T ever allow me to remove or reset scripts from no-mod items.

DON'T ever prevent MP shoppers from leaving irate 1-star reviews until after they have actually received the item

DONT ever make it easy for customers to return to a listing a week after purchase to make a balanced and thoughtful review

DONT ever allow us to test-purchase from our own stores without charging us commission

DONT ever make specialised separate areas on the MP for freebies, demos, landmarks-in-a-box and $0 land listings. I love all that stuff and would hate to miss out.

DONT ever support the concept that SL is an interactive virtual 3D world where residents might like to shop

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

[Ilyra Chardin]

---

Tiffy Vella wrote:

DON'T ever prevent MP shoppers from leaving irate 1-star reviews until

after

they have actually received the item

 

---

 

Take a look at the new thread where someone wanted to give a bad review to an entire store because they didn't get their item and 24 hours had elapsed.  There needs to be governance around the review process or it should not exist.

[Pamela Galli]

---

Ilyra Chardin wrote:

---

Tiffy Vella wrote:

DON'T ever prevent MP shoppers from leaving irate 1-star reviews until

after

they have actually received the item

 

---

 

Take a look at the new thread where someone wanted to give a bad review to an entire store because they didn't get their item and 24 hours had elapsed.  There needs to be governance around the review process or it should not exist.

---

The Commerce team is actually quite good about removing "reviews" about failed deliveries and that sort of thing. Just leave a comment and flag the review.

[Ilyra Chardin]

I haven't gotten a bad review.  I just think that the review process needs more governance.  I’m sure that bad reviews that explicitly write about delivery failures are removed.  But what about reviews where they lambast the store or the product?  Does the commerce team check to see if the reviewer actually bought the item?  That the review is fair?  That the 2o or so good / 5-star reviews didn't come from someone’s alts or close friends?

Just wondering. 

Seems to me that there is governance lacking.

Just my two cents (L$5)