Dana Enyo Posted Wednesday at 04:31 PM Share Posted Wednesday at 04:31 PM Today there's an article by the New York Times fashion editor https://www.nytimes.com/2022/06/22/style/meta-avatar-store-balenciaga-prada.html?smid=url-share and a video in CNN Business https://edition.cnn.com/videos/media/2022/06/22/zuckerberg-meta-avatar-fashion-moos-pkg-vpx.cnn/video/playlists/wacky-world-of-jeanne-moos/ All about META opening a new store where you can buy stuff for your Meta avatar. This stuff looks like what we had in 2004, but somehow 19 years of Second Life talent and creativity doesn't exist. Zuck has thrown us a real opportunity to reach millions more people, but are we going to just let it go by? Find these articles, and WRITE COMMENTS where you can. A simple Google search of meta clothing store brought up a PILE of them. (You will find my own comment attached to the NYT article.) Don't let the world ignore the amazing work that thousands have done inside SL! And don't let the media (whom I actually have a ton of respect for) pass over us like this. Sorry about the rant, but we deserve better. 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tazzie Tuque Posted Wednesday at 05:56 PM Share Posted Wednesday at 05:56 PM well, I would make a comment but on the New York times page they want you to pay for a subscription in order to even read it, never mind make any comments. and on the other page there is no option to make any comments. But seriously, Zuke has an avatar? When FB shut down my Tazz account saying I was not a real person. The only comment I can make is here, and in all honesty Zuke needs to check out SL if he wants to see what an attractive avatar really looks like. His is down right goofy looking lol. 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dana Enyo Posted Wednesday at 06:27 PM Author Share Posted Wednesday at 06:27 PM I'm surprised they make you subscribe just to read that one article; sorry about that. But search Google for "meta clothing store" and you'll find a pile of articles all coming off the same Meta press release. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Love Zhaoying Posted Wednesday at 06:38 PM Share Posted Wednesday at 06:38 PM Most are just going to take off their clothes, and run around nakey and legless anyway. I mean, why not? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anaiya Ahren Posted Wednesday at 09:18 PM Share Posted Wednesday at 09:18 PM Oh wow, those avatars are laughable. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ceka Cianci Posted 21 hours ago Share Posted 21 hours ago His avatars face looks like it's related to Woody from toy story.. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Persephone Emerald Posted 16 hours ago Share Posted 16 hours ago (edited) On 6/22/2022 at 11:38 AM, Love Zhaoying said: Most are just going to take off their clothes, and run around nakey and legless anyway. I mean, why not? Not legless, but I wonder what kind of attachments they'll use to represent their missing parts? 🍆 🌽 🍗 🦴 🥖 🌯 🌭🥕 🐈😹 🌮 🐹 🦔 🐡 ??? Edited 16 hours ago by Persephone Emerald Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coffee Pancake Posted 16 hours ago Share Posted 16 hours ago On 6/22/2022 at 12:31 PM, Dana Enyo said: This stuff looks like what we had in 2004, but somehow 19 years of Second Life talent and creativity doesn't exist. This is because Meta has significant market clout. Brett was right at the marketing meeting, there are lots of journalists who's only job is to breathlessly cover whatever Meta are doing today. Making the best counts for nothing. It's just an extension of thinking that "build and they will come" is true. Like it or not, Meta are the leading player right now simply because they are present to a large degree is most people's lives. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dana Enyo Posted 8 hours ago Author Share Posted 8 hours ago Thank you Coffee, you're right. But can't we make our voices heard on this? I'm pleased to say my comment on this was accepted and posted in the online NYT; their editors do read this stuff. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now