Tolya Ugajin Posted January 11, 2020 Share Posted January 11, 2020 5 hours ago, Pussycat Catnap said: I will NEVER see that nose the same way ever again... Hies eyes need to be below his nose... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tolya Ugajin Posted January 11, 2020 Share Posted January 11, 2020 4 hours ago, Beth Macbain said: Rule 34. (It's a safe click.) And yet barred by my company's content filter. Of course, so is Dilbert, so.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tolya Ugajin Posted January 11, 2020 Share Posted January 11, 2020 4 hours ago, Beth Macbain said: My first thought upon looking at this is "Yeah, right... 'ex-girlfriends'... they wish." Reading the words of these guys screams incel living in a fantasy world where they've actually had sex because... incel. If someone is doing this with celebrities, though, is it ethically or morally different than getting off to fantasies? I can't tell you the number of men (and a few women) I've banged in my mind while taking care of business. If I created an alt that looked identical to Harry Styles or Taylor Swift, and used them for naughty times, is that different from just closing my eyes and imagining it? Genuine question because I think it'd be creepy as hell to do that, but I don't know why when I have no issue with mind-banging them. I agree, it SEEMS creepy, but why is it any differet? And, is it creepier to build a virtual Harry Styles to pixel-pork than to mind-bang an albino walrus? What is IN this rum, anyway? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fauve Aeon Posted January 11, 2020 Share Posted January 11, 2020 9 minutes ago, Tolya Ugajin said: 4 hours ago, Beth Macbain said: Rule 34. (It's a safe click.) And yet barred by my company's content filter. I wouldn’t consider it a safe-for-work click. I knew what the rule is though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lucia Nightfire Posted January 11, 2020 Share Posted January 11, 2020 The colliders on that hand need to be adjusted bad. It was pushing in her lips before visible contact. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tolya Ugajin Posted January 11, 2020 Share Posted January 11, 2020 (edited) You have not yet explored the true depths of weirdness, young Skywalker... https://www.foxnews.com/lifestyle/gwyneth-paltrows-goop-*****-scented-candle (Seriously, LL, you won't even allow the normal term for the birth canal now? I give up!) Edited January 11, 2020 by Tolya Ugajin You gotta be kidding me 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arduenn Schwartzman Posted January 12, 2020 Share Posted January 12, 2020 20 hours ago, Tolya Ugajin said: the true depths of weirdness It is bottomless. Like where these jade eggs end up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maryanne Solo Posted January 12, 2020 Share Posted January 12, 2020 😮😣😖 Just ONE of the reasons I don't subscribe to the whole Hollyweird thing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scylla Rhiadra Posted January 12, 2020 Share Posted January 12, 2020 23 hours ago, Tolya Ugajin said: (Seriously, LL, you won't even allow the normal term for the birth canal now? I give up!) Icky filthy girl bits!! Awwwww!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Charles Blackwood Posted January 12, 2020 Share Posted January 12, 2020 18 minutes ago, Scylla Rhiadra said: Icky filthy girl bits!! Awwwww!! It has been know to turn back time, start wars and there are rumours, unsubstantiated mind you, that it can see into the future. And don’t quote me cause I’ll be a dead man, (whisper), it’s the only thing Chuck Norris is afraid of. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fauve Aeon Posted January 12, 2020 Share Posted January 12, 2020 On 1/11/2020 at 4:15 PM, Tolya Ugajin said: You have not yet explored the true depths of weirdness, young Skywalker... https://www.foxnews.com/lifestyle/gwyneth-paltrows-goop-*****-scented-candle (Seriously, LL, you won't even allow the normal term for the birth canal now? I give up!) But you can say phallus. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Charles Blackwood Posted January 12, 2020 Share Posted January 12, 2020 1 hour ago, Fauve Aeon said: But you can say phallus. We should just say Punani 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tolya Ugajin Posted January 13, 2020 Share Posted January 13, 2020 1 hour ago, Fauve Aeon said: But you can say phallus. But not pee nis Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fauve Aeon Posted January 13, 2020 Share Posted January 13, 2020 1 minute ago, Tolya Ugajin said: But not pee nis Pen!s 🙃 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tolya Ugajin Posted January 13, 2020 Share Posted January 13, 2020 19 minutes ago, Fauve Aeon said: Pen!s 🙃 Weird it worked for you Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fauve Aeon Posted January 13, 2020 Share Posted January 13, 2020 Because I used a bang instead of an ‘i’, lol. 1 hour ago, Marut72 said: We should just say Punani Erica Jong has long since had so many of the words for the female parts quite covered in “Fanny”. 😉 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Odaks Posted January 13, 2020 Share Posted January 13, 2020 A magical misspelling appeared before my very eyes, many years ago, and might be just what is needed now:- Panamour Canal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fauve Aeon Posted January 13, 2020 Share Posted January 13, 2020 Yoni 💁🏻♀️ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Facebook
Instagram
Twitter
YouTube
Flickr
Recommended Posts
Please take a moment to consider if this thread is worth bumping.
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now