Derek Torvalar

LlazarusLlong wrote: Derek Torvalar wrote: Just the one actually. Aha! You DO have an alt! [i mean the ass in the ass of the ass.] Hmm, yes, the seat of consciousness.

Just the one actually.

1. Quite a while ago. 2. I have become a more well-rounded person, increasing my competency to a point where I am able to function at a high level in many more aspects in my life. Such that, I find that I have increasingly more and more time to spend in SL. 3.All the time, it's good for me! About 5 years.

:matte-motes-wink-tongue: Guess I am staying right where I am.

LlazarusLlong wrote: Madelaine McMasters wrote: Jakob, I've been in SL seven years and though I've met a few females that were so over the top I wondered who was driving then, for the most part I find no dissonance. I'd also have no idea if I was in a sim stacked with alts unless they told me, or again were engaged in over the top behavior. So, I suspect that your apparently supernatural ability to detect gender bending and alts is actually something else, internal and natural. Everything in moderation, including cynicism... and moderation. If ignorance is bliss, why aren't more people happy? But they are. They just don't realize it.

Contact support. They get paid to listen to drivel like this.

When the forum ends, then will come the Rapture. Everyone on Earth will be judged by their posts. Blessed are the threadstarters, and the cogent self-possessed for they shall sit next to Ebbe. Blessed are the weak spellers, thin skinned and semi-literates for they shall inherit SL v1,. etc etc etc, ad infinitum. ETA Fixed speeling. Doh! Spelling

Julieannasupreme wrote: How does it work can i make money is there a youtube video i can watch No, you won't be able to make any money. In fact you will likely bankrupt yourself paying for pretend clothes that do not really exist.

Valashu Tizzy wrote: Hello there, my first post in any SL Forum, hope it is not de-placed So...my Account is about 8 years old, will we be able to keep our names? Or do we all gain the "Resident" Name. Without decreasing the efford of the resident in sl, but i really would appreciate to let others see my actual SL age there. If it starts from 0 for everyone, it feels more like loosing something. I dont mind about my avi itself, anything i have now in SL i could rebuild or rebuy. And even it may cost some money, i will be willingly pay it aslong as SL2 is really a way better than SL itself. But my Name is to me a important part of my identity i gained, and i dont want to miss it. I mean, i spend a lot of time in SL, i guess that should be rewarded. Thanks for listening, and sorry if i wrote in the wrong forum. I am just worried alot. No, I'm afraid you will have to start over again from scratch. Nothing is going to be transferable, at least that is my understanding. But you aren't going to care, because Ebbe says it is going to be wonderful, so wonderful you will lose your mind.

Yes.

Ohjiro Watanabe wrote: LlazarusLlong wrote: Ohjiro Watanabe wrote: Little Hitler with his rule book. LOL Erm, it's not Derek's rule book, -- boring ramble snipped --- In this context, I think Derek was trying to be helpful to the poster, lest she should fall foul of this "rule". That's right so what is Derek doing waving it. In this context Derek was being a care troll. Obviously knob, your reach exceeds your grasp; While my grasp exceeds your reach..

Ohjiro Watanabe wrote: Little Hitler with his rule book. LOL Wuttaknob, eh indeed. Considerate of you to announce yourself for others like that. Now they can just look and say, "Oh never mind, it's just the knob spouting off again." Know thyself as thy label. Did you just awake from a 10 year coma?

Darrius Gothly wrote: Llazarus? I am getting seriously worried about you lately. Not only have you recently waded into the middle of a fight .. to break it up!! .. but now you're demonstrating an almost tender fatherly concern for the well being of GD. You're not going soft on us now, are ya? He is a recent recruit to the CaringNazi movement.

Caitlin Tobias wrote: Derek Torvalar wrote: Caitlin Tobias wrote: See, wallspace enough...and I can also cover the windows, I am easy like that: Oooohhh, lots of space left. Looks like it's going to be a long shoot. ;-P <waits for Dres> You want a pic of you and Dres? Fine with me, as long as you don't bring your turkey. I do have my standards.. The turkey is only set up for singles at the moment but I can modify it for couples or more. Do you prefer breast or thighs?

Cool. Here's 50L, GFY.

Caitlin Tobias wrote: See, wallspace enough...and I can also cover the windows, I am easy like that: Oooohhh, lots of space left. Looks like it's going to be a long shoot. ;-P <waits for Dres>

Dresden Ceriano wrote: Derek Torvalar wrote: Madelaine McMasters wrote: Dresden Ceriano wrote: Madelaine McMasters wrote: Cleo, I suspect Derek believes his satire is obvious to everyone. I'm sure Derek knows very well that no one without the ability to rub two brain cells together will necessarily understand what he has to say. ...Dres It's that kind of hubris that makes me think LL would benefit from elimination of the GD forum. "Hubris" McMasters? What a revealing and confirmatory choice. Hubris has something to do with circumcision, right? ...Dres Um, ya, of course.

CleoSertorii wrote: Derek Torvalar wrote: That would be both a polite and considerate thing to do, don't you think? You just might make some good friends of the people here. I am sure it would not take hours and hours, and it need not be done on every single post you make. However, if you are going to insinuate yourself into the middle of a discussion I think it is prudent and wise to know just who you are getting involved with as well as to be damn sure you are aware of the subject under discussion. Remember, we are having a discussion in the General Discussion area. But then you weren't here for the real battles of a number of years ago, unless by another name. By all means, you do as you please, but understand how you present to others will determine how you are treated. We like to be entertaining but are not here for your ego-centric entertainment. for the record, i didnt "insinuate" myself into any discussion in this thread...you commented on MY post first, not the other way around, and there was no "debate" going on at the time. I was VERY aware of the subject, which was wall decorations in SL homes, so no need to preach to me. Please dont forget that YOU were the one who started this entire thing by basically ordering my to remove my photo, even if you meant it as some kind of a joke. I dont come in here to entertain anyone, or to be entertained. I abuse this forum for information, not as an accessory to my social life. FIFY

Caitlin Tobias wrote: Derek Torvalar wrote: No, as I, and the Llazgun echoed, I have no issues with what Cleo posted in the least. Just a little exercise. And this wasn't a derail, we may have been up on two wheels but not completely off the rails. We should get together for another shoot, if you have the wallspace. ;-) OK, then maybe I will see some more wall decoration tomorrow morning over breakfast! Ah and another shoot sounds good, I have some walls left and I also found some pants for you to wear -a vailable at the mens department new round, which will be nice for a change: https://www.flickr.com/photos/xuelovespizza/16686760922/ ROFL

Madelaine McMasters wrote: Dresden Ceriano wrote: Madelaine McMasters wrote: Cleo, I suspect Derek believes his satire is obvious to everyone. I'm sure Derek knows very well that no one without the ability to rub two brain cells together will necessarily understand what he has to say. ...Dres It's that kind of hubris that makes me think LL would benefit from elimination of the GD forum. "Hubris" McMasters? What a revealing and confirmatory choice.

Caitlin Tobias wrote: Derek Torvalar wrote: Thank you for making my point for me. I posted the pic in the hope of mollifying you as you seemed to have needed a pic rather desperately. It is usually a good practise (watching McMasters?) to familiarize yourself with the players before wading into the fray. For instance, Caitlin and I have been good friends for 5 years and if she had a problem with my posting to the thread in the manner I have she would have told me to back off. And out of repsect for her I would have. But then Caity knows what I am referring to as she has read a number of the threads posted in the last week that refer to the issues here. You can also look at my posting history, as I have done with you, to get an idea about my style and concerns. I have been following the thread, of cours, and have kept quiet because I was a bit unsure and curious on where this was going and also, as Derek and Llazarus know I am very careful in what I post (pictures as well as text), due to past experiences in this forum. Posting or having pics of actors portraying characters from a tv show, I personally have no issue with this and can't see it as a problem - fan-art/posters/photos with autographs etc are often free available on official websites as long as you don't use it for profit..but just as a fan, why not ? I do not think this was your issue with Cleo's image, right? I had no idea a simple thread on wall decoration would go the way this one went, but hey hoo..I've seen worse derailings . Oh and Derek, I would have loved to show the other wall in my home, with our pic... but alas, I would have had to blur the complete wall for disneyfication.. Anyway, for every one else: show them walls! No, as I, and the Llazgun echoed, I have no issues with what Cleo posted in the least. Just a little exercise. And this wasn't a derail, we may have been up on two wheels but not completely off the rails. We should get together for another shoot, if you have the wallspace. ;-)

LlazarusLlong wrote: Does esperanto mean hopefully in Esperanto? Bravado!

Dresden Ceriano wrote: Derek Torvalar wrote: PS Dres, check your mail. I did and have been thoroughly insulted by the lack of dick shots. ...Dres They are all on my wall.

CleoSertorii wrote: Derek Torvalar wrote: Thank you for making my point for me. I posted the pic in the hope of mollifying you as you seemed to have needed a pic rather desperately. It is usually a good practise (watching McMasters?) to familiarize yourself with the players before wading into the fray. For instance, Caitlin and I have been good friends for 5 years and if she had a problem with my posting to the thread in the manner I have she would have told me to back off. And out of repsect for her I would have. But then Caity knows what I am referring to as she has read a number of the threads posted in the last week that refer to the issues here. You can also look at my posting history, as I have done with you, to get an idea about my style and concerns. my god, are you for real? are you honestly suggesting that before i post anything in any thread anywhere in this forum, that i take hours of my time searching out the "regulars" and read their posts just to get to know what kind of people they are? Its not a freaking battle (or it doesnt have to be)., and i dont see why cerain people have to make it into one. Do i keep having to remind everyone that this was supposed to be a wall decoration showcase thread, not some sort of legal debate? I just wanted to participate and show what ive been working on at home, not get into arguments with a bunch of strangers. That would be both a polite and considerate thing to do, don't you think? You just might make some good friends of the people here. I am sure it would not take hours and hours, and it need not be done on every single post you make. However, if you are going to insinuate yourself into the middle of a discussion I think it is prudent and wise to know just who you are getting involved with as well as to be damn sure you are aware of the subject under discussion. Remember, we are having a discussion in the General Discussion area. But then you weren't here for the real battles of a number of years ago, unless by another name. By all means, you do as you please, but understand how you present to others will determine how you are treated. We like to be entertaining but are not here for your ego-centric entertainment.

Aspektas kiel ĉi tiu ne tuj daŭros tre ĉi tie. Bonŝance.