Jump to content

Desiree Moonwinder

  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

280 Excellent

About Desiree Moonwinder

  • Rank
    Flirts shamelessly at random “Hi’s”

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Agreed. I further suggest that the ancient Corn Field be the autonomous zone on which they do so.
  2. I have two different wired versions and one wireless version. My wireless one does not work well in wired mode. In all cases, I install the driver to test the unit, and then uninstall the driver. In SL, it works fine without the driver.
  3. Probably not. Most Role Play (RP) SIMs let people live for free. Many are totally empty. On the clubbing scene, clubs pop up all the time that try to establish a clientele by offering prizes for visiting.
  4. To require mesh avatars at human erotic roleplay SIMs is hardly new. This isn't newsworthy.
  5. I listened to the entire video, which I now regret. My reaction is, "why are these people talking at all?" The Sansar Project was the #1 priority, and now it is a complete unmitigated failure. When your #1 priority fails, you have no credibility, and are no longer worth listening.
  6. The solution for people who cannot be bothered to look before they click twice (there is a second confirmation) is perhaps to frequent these forums rather than SL.
  7. If you are only concerned about your own in-world experience, you can increase the value of the AudioLevelRolloff Debug Setting in your viewer. See http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/Debug_Settings . People who play combat games in SL dial up that AudioLevelRolloff debug setting so they can hear weapon fire from a long way away. If you are trying to make it so other people can hear, Rolig Loon's answer (above) is your answer.
  8. Are you speaking of Plato's Republic? I rather liked that. I don't see the work as prophecy, but yeah, its likely predictive of what we are going through.
  10. I think that is an excellent suggestion. If you see a profile inworld that you don't like, desist from reading it. If you think the profile violates the TOS, AR it. The least productive thing to do would be to enter the forums and post defamatory terms like the one in red above. It is unlikely that SL will ban a person just because they are politically in favor of an elected official.
  11. The thread title is: The question itself is defamatory to SL. Such is not not acceptable, but the title suggests otherwise.
  12. The thread is about an inworld event that the OP doesn't like, and the procedure is to file an AR. All the rest is thread drift.
  13. I don't understand why we are having this conversation in the first place. The Community Participation Guidelines are clear:
  14. You meant to say omnipotent. Read Paul Tillich's Systematic Theology, especially Volume Two. He deals with it rather well.
  15. I'm satisfied to let LL's AR team do what they do. There are two sides to every story. I only hear one side, but the one side I hear sounds like hyperbole. If it were ban'able "hateful" behavior to be a member of any group that ever told a lie, we would have to abolish all leading political parties, and ban everyone who ever joined or gave a donation to one.
  • Create New...