Jump to content

"Remember Second Life? It’s Now Taking On Big Tech’s Metaverse | WSJ"


davidventer
 Share

You are about to reply to a thread that has been inactive for 820 days.

Please take a moment to consider if this thread is worth bumping.

Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, animats said:

Sansar is still turned on. Here are its user stats:

sansar2022.thumb.png.70cca229ef42a22ff2bb17aeeadabbd3.png

Yes, what's left of Sansar has 11 concurrent users. Will the last one to leave please turn off the server?

Here's Decentraland.

decentraland2022.thumb.png.831cc9d179bd8de6db67b5f4afd7b401.png

Decentraland has 1860 users right now.

The servers all show the same world, but with different users. It's sharded. They seem to turn on more servers when the load is higher, although not sure about this. Yes, despite all the press coverage and all the NFT hype, Decentraland has a tiny user base.

Here's VRchat:

vrchat2022.thumb.png.79e8642e4bf3c51a5a1779529928a475.png

VRchat has 24,857 users online right now. They've been showing growth for a while. They're getting to be serious competition.

Second Life has 55,612 users online right now. About typical for a Saturday.

Roblox has 1,407,058 users online right now. They were smaller than Second Life before the Sansar mistake. Market cap of US$37 billion right now, but not profitable.

Nobody seems to have public user counts on Facebook/Meta's Horizon World.

If Second Life were on Steamcharts, it would be in 17th place right now, behind "Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege". That's pretty good.

All of these are figures as of a few minutes before this post, mostly from third party sites.

  So that's a quick overview of the competition.

Second Life should be on Steam

LL should finally admit that this is an entertainment product, anyone doing anything serious here is an aberration, like business meetings in minecraft.

  • Like 3
  • Haha 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, Arielle Popstar said:

I think they should not have upped the allowable Li per region but I'll bet a lot of region owners were pretty happy with that.

No, it was the renters who were happy. Rent is really based on $L per prim per week, and when LL increased the land impact capacity, it made prims a lot less valuable. Landlords had to either up their prim allowances or cut rent per square meter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You are about to reply to a thread that has been inactive for 820 days.

Please take a moment to consider if this thread is worth bumping.

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...