Doc Carling

Sad, so sad...

Oh well, I lost your heart. But the time will heal the wound. 😥

I have no problem with your reply. It is rather neutral and objective and tells your opinion. That's not the usual tone in the Community. If you read other threads also you notice that discussions even about simple matters turn very fast into dramas and attacks under the beltline. I wonder why that is? Anyway, I know I should be smarter and not take part on such dramas. lol But sometimes I cannot resist.

Let me remind you. It wasn't me who presented humans as dehumanizing graphics. It were the owners of the graphic themselves. The owner of the second avatar even said she wouldn't probably friend with someone who is not willing to accept her as frog. Did you miss all that to read? And who is "all of us". The discussion is about this 2 pictures. You seem to be confused. I hope that your are ok? Serious, I might be rude, arrogant and whatever you want, but I still can make a distinction between humans and computer graphics. If anyone sees humans on the pictures and wants me to share this sight, well, then good luck. C'mon some of you guys are only bashing me in hope to collect likes. Would be interesting to know how many likes I produced in this tread with my replies. 😛

Thank you again. I'm learning a Kupra demo at the moment. Not exactly the same like Maitreya.

Thank you. But does that work with BoM?

Quick question. Has the Kupra HUD no alpha tab?

I don't have a problem with overweightes avies. The avi in question is technically built so badly that itself turned it to a caricature. I know many very beautiful looking overwighted avatars made with mesh bodies. We should stop to highjack @Gopi Passiflora thread. If you still insist, I don't mind to continue the discussion in a separate thread.

I gave you a like for this intelligent comment.

Fishing for likes? lol

Well, not sure, if I translate "forkable" correctly, Luna. I find only translations on google related to eating. lol Anyway, you might have a point when we say, we are allowed only to comment if the poster of an object expressly invites us to do so. Btw, for @Rolig Loon and me is the matter done since page 2. So what's the point at all to continue it?

The problem is that we are permanently talk about different things. While you and other posters are obsessed by the believe that I attack and hurt the owner of the posted graphic I actually just tell my opinion about the picture itself. How the owner of a pictures takes it, that's his/her personal matter. This is not your business anyway. You just use it to pump it up to a moralic drama.

I made these avatars a longer time ago. The first is perhaps too young for a teen. The second one looks older. Both are made with an Maitreya body, custom shapes and classic heads.

A mesh body gives your avatar a more natural look. The body form is smoother and more detailed. Last but not least, no stretchmarks. One of the biggest disadvantages that classic bodies have.

I couldn't say it better. See, what's the current stand. You and some other insist that I - before I tell my opinion about a graphic posted on the public web - have to consider, if my comment perhaps hurts the feelings of the person who posted the graphic. Now I wonder. Do I have to treat the Trillion of graphics and pictures on web the same way? Do I have in a museum to shut up when I look at art because I might hurt the artists feelings with my comments? Or in general do I have to shut up before I say something negative about no matter what because of the vague chance it makes someone feeling bad? If you don't see the nonsense of your expectations, then I can't help you. I'm out.

I meant what I said: Believe. Believe that God exists and don't ask for proofs. Where is the truth part? Anyway, I guess that's too far off topic.

An adult person who should know what the result can be, if she/he post such graphics.

But you are aware that we are talking about computer generated graphics without human rights and not about real existing persons?

What has the truth to do with religion? Isn't relgion founded on believe?

What lets you assume that this thread is about me and that I have concerns about in what way downloaders use my pictures? If you are referring to my websites, they address an audience that is interested in such kind of material. I'm fully aware of what they might do with the pictures. And the residents which model for me as well. What the headline says this thread is about private flickr pages.

Do you like hypothetical What if questions? Here are some more. 135 hypothetical questions.

The more powerful the equipment the higher the power bill. That's to consider also. An high end pc or graphic card consumes much more energy than an average system. I just learned that after I updated mine.

No problem. Let me repeat. My comments are about pc generated graphics built under technical limitatons. And not about the persons which use these avatars

I just mentioned it as simple information. In those days I used the same skins and clothes like all of us. And in no way I considered myself as ugly. But I don't regret bygone times. Well, if the second pictures mirrors your inner self in rl, you must be a very attractive lady. (If you allow me to say).