Jump to content

Vivienne Schell

Resident
  • Posts

    1,257
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Vivienne Schell

  1. Oh, i want a recount. Audit that. Thousands? Really? Hey, find me these five million conservatives!
  2. Ah, here you go finally., Thanks for dropping the "observer" rhethorics and coming out of the cover. You know that, of course, being the alt right propagandist you are, but a reminder: Hitler and the Nazis did not explicitly call for WW2. They did not explicitly call for the holocaust. So if you want to apolgise the fascist Trump and his fascist intentions by absurd relativations and excuses you are just another fascist propagandist. Or blind.
  3. Hed did. Welcome to fascism. They feel strong now, and confirmed. Expect that to become worse.
  4. Unfortunately the word "fascism" has been widely abused by the far left and the soviet dictatorships to label their opponents. So it lost it´s orginal meaning in the public attention. Unfortunately fascism still is fascism. I find Eco´s definition from 1996 very helpful. "The Cult of Tradition", characterized by cultural syncretism, even at the risk of internal contradiction. When all truth has already been revealed by Tradition, no new learning can occur, only further interpretation and refinement. "The Rejection of modernism", which views the rationalistic development of Western culture since the Enlightenment as a descent into depravity. Eco distinguishes this from a rejection of superficial technological advancement, as many fascist regimes cite their industrial potency as proof of the vitality of their system. "The Cult of Action for Action's Sake", which dictates that action is of value in itself, and should be taken without intellectual reflection. This, says Eco, is connected with anti-intellectualism and irrationalism, and often manifests in attacks on modern culture and science. "Disagreement Is Treason" – Fascism devalues intellectual discourse and critical reasoning as barriers to action, as well as out of fear that such analysis will expose the contradictions embodied in a syncretistic faith. "Fear of Difference", which fascism seeks to exploit and exacerbate, often in the form of racism or an appeal against foreigners and immigrants. "Appeal to a Frustrated Middle Class", fearing economic pressure from the demands and aspirations of lower social groups. "Obsession with a Plot" and the hyping-up of an enemy threat. This often combines an appeal to xenophobia with a fear of disloyalty and sabotage from marginalized groups living within the society (such as the German elite's 'fear' of the 1930s Jewish populace's businesses and well-doings; see also anti-Semitism). Eco also cites Pat Robertson's book The New World Order as a prominent example of a plot obsession. Fascist societies rhetorically cast their enemies as "at the same time too strong and too weak." On the one hand, fascists play up the power of certain disfavored elites to encourage in their followers a sense of grievance and humiliation. On the other hand, fascist leaders point to the decadence of those elites as proof of their ultimate feebleness in the face of an overwhelming popular will. "Pacifism is Trafficking with the Enemy" because "Life is Permanent Warfare" – there must always be an enemy to fight. Both fascist Germany under Hitler and Italy under Mussolini worked first to organize and clean up their respective countries and then build the war machines that they later intended to and did use, despite Germany being under restrictions of the Versailles treaty to not build a military force. This principle leads to a fundamental contradiction within fascism: the incompatibility of ultimate triumph with perpetual war. "Contempt for the Weak", which is uncomfortably married to a chauvinistic popular elitism, in which every member of society is superior to outsiders by virtue of belonging to the in-group. Eco sees in these attitudes the root of a deep tension in the fundamentally hierarchical structure of fascist polities, as they encourage leaders to despise their underlings, up to the ultimate Leader who holds the whole country in contempt for having allowed him to overtake it by force. "Everybody is Educated to Become a Hero", which leads to the embrace of a cult of death. As Eco observes, "[t]he Ur-Fascist hero is impatient to die. In his impatience, he more frequently sends other people to death." "Machismo", which sublimates the difficult work of permanent war and heroism into the sexual sphere. Fascists thus hold "both disdain for women and intolerance and condemnation of nonstandard sexual habits, from chastity to homosexuality." "Selective Populism" – The People, conceived monolithically, have a Common Will, distinct from and superior to the viewpoint of any individual. As no mass of people can ever be truly unanimous, the Leader holds himself out as the interpreter of the popular will (though truly he dictates it). Fascists use this concept to delegitimize democratic institutions they accuse of "no longer represent[ing] the Voice of the People." "Newspeak" – Fascism employs and promotes an impoverished vocabulary in order to limit critical reasoning.
  5. Was George Floyd a communist? And were the cops who killed him nazis? Or was it vice versa? Ahem.
  6. Let me summarise your breathtaking enlightment. You basically say that every government on the planet, every "mainstream" scientist on the planet as well as the the "left" and whomever you dislike has the intention to let 100,000´s of thousand people die unnecessarily? Really? Why should they do that? Explain.
  7. Science does not challenge 1+1=2. And if some people at so called "altenative" (ahem) websites claim that 1+1=3 in the headline, why bother to read the rest? Why should i have a dialogue with someone who either has no brain or is a cynic psycho?
  8. So even corrupt politicians earn some credits, occasionally, hehe. Anyways, there´s as much idiocy, stupidity, criminal energy and corruption in politics as there is anywhere else. and the very most neither are corrupt nor criminals nor "leeches" but they try to do what the souvereign ordered them to to. Which usually is a damned tough job.
  9. Even if, the most founding fathers were straight ahead politicians, right?
  10. Wow. Didn´t know that i fell for a conspiracy theory. Shame on me. Someone like you should not fall for a modern one, but obviously you did.
  11. Well, consider that these leeches made it possible for you to have something like Second Life, which certainly never would have been thinkable by leaving all that stuff up to some guys at the Vatican who insisted that the world is flat. Oh wait, it IS!
  12. Unfortunately a democratic republic always offers the option to get voted out of business. At least theoretically.
  13. No one wants to ban speeches. But it´s illusional to think that the content of each and any speech is following a constitutional path. Also, voting or not doesn´t matter. Stalin didn´t hold speeches to enocurage people to vote.
  14. If it was of any significance, Mr. "Justice by combat" Guiliani would have been on it. Ahem, maybe he was and some court threw it out?
  15. Political speeches are held for triggering political actions, generally. If they were not, politicians all over the world would be out of business.
  16. Exactly my opinion. And then show up there and express disagreement - in huge numbers.
  17. Apparently the courts disagree with you. If you are unsure, file a case at your local court, if you are so entitled, and add one more number to the row of thrown out, baseless claims.
  18. Yeah, it was a nice view to see the red flags all over the capitol. Oh wait, I watched the wrong movie.
  19. 1. It was not hacked or whatever 2. They did investigate 3. 62 courts confrmed that it was not hacked or whatever So what?
×
×
  • Create New...