Storm Clarence

CiaoBella Mirabella wrote: Bella's new look.... The always lovely Bella. Wonderful.

Wilhiam Hydraconis wrote: Premium membership is like ranks in the forums. Those happy with it in bliss should remain in that bliss for all I care, but they are not above anybody else. = >.< = I never meant to imply I was above 'anyone' for being a premium account. I did not put anybody down - I am not a pig. I made this post because someone in SLA asked the question about premium memberships, I figured I would start this thread so they can understand the opinions of others.

Yay Mags!

C'mon Mags...you are all talk and no pics. Let's get into the spirit of our vanities.

Show us your INK!   Edited for nudity.

I just made a post in the Avatar section discussing premium membership (Do you treat..). Why don't you check it out and see some responses - maybe this will help you make a decision. Enjoy

...to a premium membership? I do. I get a little Linden home to dress and unwind from the daily grind of in-world play. I get a really good stipend to spend on some fancy clothes for dancing. The support has been really good in answering my questions and addressing my issues. The bottom line is that all these 'perks' cost next to nothing. What's your opinion: do you treat your avatar well?

I think premium is worth it- yes. You get support - and I have *ALWAYS* received the support I needed. You get a weekly stipend and a free little Linden home. Yes, premium is the way to go. If you do the math you will find that it cost maybe $1 per month with all the perks you get.

Jessika Rang wrote: Storm Clarence wrote: Wildcat, drop that pic in the VaNiTy ThReAd - perfect! I think you meant "purrrfect"? Well said Jessika - purrrrrfect!

Whenever my pants look that way I turn off my AO - my newbie walk is indicative of the pants crotch riding up my backside. Oh well.

Rhonda Huntress wrote: This is another shot of Clover in her makeup and costume. surreal colors - another great shot.

Dana Hickman wrote: Costa Rica 10 - Full Size Great shots Dana; you look lovely. I like the boots in both photos, too.

Jean, click the film reel icon in the post editor and then enter the you-tube URL.

No reason to feel silly - I had some issues with c.c. in the past - it usually takes a day for LL to catch up. I wish I had more a of a solution for you. If you are a premium member get on live chat - if not, perhaps submit a ticket.

This may be a foolish question, but has the card expired? If not, perhaps it is a hiccup in the system - re-input the card and wait a day or two for the system to catch up.

Venus Petrov wrote: <snip> We are all equal here. An excellent signature line Venus. You always seem to impress me with your insights and wisdom. We are all equal.

Cato Badger wrote: Congratulations Storm! You have found the way to grease the wheels of the forum, I see. Have you appealed to the Grim Moderator yet? You should really get your record cleansed as any disciplinary besmirchment could mean the next perceived breach sees your punishment escalated - and since your warning was about something that LL subsequently endorsed you should be receiving kudos not suspensions. Thank you Cato for your kind words. I, too, would like to see a fair and balanced forum; I think LL is on board with this. Lexie has already proved to be a valuable resource (kind and considerate, as well.) My prior minor indiscretion was just that - a minor indiscretion; i apologized profusely and pleaded for forgiveness. I hope they understand because I, too, would like to 'rank' on par with my fellow forumites. I do hope, Cato, that you have the opportunity to post to my VaNiTy ThReAd - or at least, take a look around. Again, thank you for your kind words. ETA My understanding, that to effectively communicate, as many attempt to do in this forum: e.g., a spell checker, image posting, a link to the OED, grammar suggestions, videos, etc.; we should 'all' have in our toolboxes *all* the tools available. I think tools to communicate should not *have* to be earned, they should be given - they should be taken away from people that abuse the tool vis 'a vis ignorance or improper application. That being said, one can not be excused for not having a sense of proportion when responding or creating posts - regardless of the tools in their toolbox; if they don't 'get it' then they never will; their toolbox (in it's entirety) should be confiscated.

Wicked Galaxy wrote: Having fun playing with colors... wickedly pink!

You can either delete the name - defriend. Or you can contact the individuals and tell them you are deleting the name. Either way works - whatever you are comfortable with. I delete. If they really want to continue a relationship of any sort they will get back in touch with you. There is no way to do it where they would not know.

Keli Kyrie wrote: You had her fix it? YAY! :smileyvery-happy: No. It's all Lexie. Send her a thank you. She, too, seems to be enjoying the forum.

Quinn Morani wrote: Huh. Here it says you have to have the Member rank to be able to add YouTube videos, but I see Honored Residents adding videos too. Is the help section wrong? http://community.secondlife.com/t5/help/faqpage/faq-category-id/ranksroles#ranksroles I spoke with Lexie today; ergo I made this OP. Isn't is fun? The only difference in member rank is the ability to post tags. Oh well. I will work hard for that privilege.

Thanks Keli. I do need a St. Patrick's Day hat. Maybe I should start a thread "Dressing Storm for St. Patrick's."

What video reminds you of SL:

Jacki Silverfall wrote: /me Likes to plan ahead. Probably wont post again for months. :smileyindifferent: Then it was a mighty fine intro post. Happy St. Patrick's Day