Jump to content

SoniaVileva

Resident
  • Content Count

    20
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by SoniaVileva

  1. I have exactly the same thing too ... never see this message before, even when it is under maintenance. It will be great news if we are getting new benefits service ... I wonder what will that be !
  2. thANK YOU SO MUCH These works with scripts !! YAY Regions on Aditi Aditi has limited capacity, so regions are frequently taken offline in order to make room for regions with more interesting test cases. See this page for the status of several Aditi regions. Permanent Sandbox Regions Residents who wish to test their stuff before bringing it to the main grid have been given dedicated regions to do so: Sandbox Astutula (128, 128) Sandbox Exemplar (128, 128) Sandbox Pristina (128, 128) Sandbox Verenda (128, 128) Sandbox Wanderton (128, 1
  3. I used to test my rig with Morris SIM in beta grid and it has been disappeared for a few days without much warning and pointers to alternative. The rest of the sims do not allow running scripts, and many testing requires that. I do not want to test my rig in production grid as it will be very costly for all the upload fees. Can someone suggest a way out? Is there a forum on what is happening with beta grid ? it will be good to get connect to those your are responsible for maintaining those servers. Hearing first hand will save a lot of time. Thanks
  4. If I were Linden Lab ... thinking about it making me happy even I know it is impossible ... 1. I will pick up the phone to call Mr. Frisby and similar competitors to see if we can create joint programs for SL creators to opt-in for migrating some of their content to other metaverse. This could be a win-win-win for all, and new income for LL. 2. Rebrand SL to focus on adult entertainment and spinoff a separate entity for children / education / commercial purposes and keep them separate! This could potentially reduce regulatory costs and legal costs for each government SL is operating.
  5. Thank you. I also confirmed that as of today, I have no more TP crashes, I can TP to where ever I like, as many times as I like. No crashes. I even can keep my hair as I arrive. All is working for me. I am very happy. Thanks to all who has helped.
  6. Well, it could be a bug of the subscription program or something I didn't do, because I find it very unusual not to have any updates since April 8, not a single one update, as the event affected so many people. So I assume it must be me who did something wrong not having to receive those updates. So you have not received any updates neither ?
  7. Can you show me where it was being said which covers ALL conversations without the context of personal information? Even the rule being quoted here state very clearly that there are exceptions and conditions. I do agree that if someone sends you a private IM addressed only to you, it should not be shared without your permission, but you have to be allowed to monitor it, in order to respond to it. I am more interested in the interpretation of this particular rule in the context of public discussion as the original question also refers to local chat. So if we use this public discuss
  8. Thank you for your opinion, but I still think it is better to have someone from LL to answer this. What you are suggesting, does not make sense.
  9. Have anyone received any updates since the problem was officially posted on April 8 ? Posted 8 days ago. Apr 08, 2019 - 16:05 PDT
  10. I will read "the remote monitoring, posting or sharing of conversations without a participant’s consent are prohibited." where conversations here refer to conversations that contain participant's personal information. Otherwise, it does not make sense to have local chat. I also think the word "remote' is redundant. Or I will rewrite it like this: "collecting and sharing participant's personal information without participant's consents are prohibited." But I am not a lawyer! LOL Someone from LL should answer this question.
  11. I suspect it has to do with the fact that most hair objects has alpha on and it is well known that the way alpha is rendered is buggy. This happens to static objects in a sim too where there are alpha planes in front of it, it sometimes disappears, and require a click so that it knows it has to render it. You may be able to reproduce it by wearing a prim on yourself, turn it transparent, and TP here and there.
  12. Since appliers can do this already, can I assume that these magic values although undocumented, but already been deduced and that is how appliers can do it now?
  13. I still don't quite understand the behavior here. I understand that before Bakes-On-Mesh, UUIDs were used to identified baked texture to viewers such that viewers can load the correct textures from server correctly. But the UUIDs is not accessible to users. Since appliers can already use Bakes-On-Mesh feature, I assume this can be done programmatically already. My question is that what do they use to obtain the UUID, and what is the behavior of the content that this UUID points to. i.e. if I add a tattoo, will I get a new UUID? or the content of the UUID points to get changed? I pr
  14. Quick question: Are these "BAKE_HEAD, BAKE_UPPER, BAKE_LOWER, BAKE_EYES, BAKE_SKIRT, BAKE_HAIR" texture UUID variables that we can access programmatically to apply texture to any wearable mesh ? If not, how can it be done programmatically? Thanks
  15. http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/LlGetNotecardLine llGetNoteCardLine(name, line) where name can be an uuid and the notecard DOES NOT have to be in the inventory as suggested by Rolig Loon.
×
×
  • Create New...