irihapeti

it starts with skin and shape other people will have recommendations but for something like that look then I would start with group gifts, MM and lucky board gifts from for example: WoW Skins have starter skins on their MM and lucky boards inworld - no need to join group Besom for hair. Is free group join. Group gift hair and MM and lucky boards is lots of other hair and skin shops that can get you started as well. So look round and get demos once you decide you like a style and think about spend real money + for shape then pick a Library shape to get started and mod/tweak it yourself to make your own. Party Girl is a pretty good one to get started with I think for that image the form when making own avatar is shape follows skin get a skin and then make/mod a shape that looks best with that skin. Specially the face. When go the other way: shape then skin, it can be quite hard to match. So best to go the other way. Start with skin and mod shape + for the widest range of mesh clothes to fit your new shape then use the Standard Sizing guide to mod the body shape to a proportion in the guide can get that info here: https://darisl.wordpress.com/help/standard-sizing-information/

is possible for a actual RL bank to open a branch in SL however the RL bank cant take deposits in L$. SL users are specifically not allowed to "sell" L$ except on the Lindex. Operators are specifically not allowed to "buy" L$ from me which pose practical problems for me if I was a bank customer like how do I make a deposit of RL$ into my bank account in SL? How do I withdraw and receive RL$ from my SL bank account in SL?

jejjeje (:

PhoenixAglow wrote: 1) What could you use a gamification engine for, when Sansar becomes public? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gamification 2) Can you write a gamification engine description? Maybe for a thesis . . . 3) Do you have skill in game deisign you would like to share with educators? 4) What do you recommend for testing of meeting game goals/measurement of behaviour? 5) If you know how to program in C#, would you like to contribute to a gamification engine? 6) Would you like to contribute to projects as a visual storyteller, or storyline developer? 7) Would you like to create gamified objects? 8) Are you willing to be a game tester for such projects? 9) How can we increase social interactions in a gamified design? 1) to make games 2) yes. yes 3) yes. and yes if the educators be happy to share their salary with me 4) wages money 5) yes. and yes for money 6) yes for money 7) yes 8) yes for money 9) pay more money (:

check that your card is actually running. Could be that your system is using the video on the motherboard

yes i get what you saying which is you came back on here after buying a product and then complained that it may not do what the sales pitch says it can do according to other purchasers reviews of the product i dont know why you felt the need to come back on this scripters forums to say that this is a scripters forum where people help new people to become scripters, and to help each other become better scripters if you got a problem with a script that you are writing then post it ok and you will get help with it we not really interested in problems with products that you might have bought. Take that up with the person you bought it off. If you can find them

it will get gamed. Like pretty much any other metric gamed like my army of alts will buy heaps of my stuff. So that I am the top seller of that product eta: i mean listed on the boards as the top seller

sorry. I just started laughing when I read your post i shouldnt laugh really but I thought was pretty funny. I am a bit weird like that + ps i just add bc you now clarify what you never said before earlier. The only way can do a sim-wide scan in LSL is not in one go. The detector prim has to traverse the whole sim doing sensors scans in bursts

ACaterin, you a pretty funny person like you go: heres what I want to do Rolig who is a legend scripter goes: heres what you actual can do and actual cant do then you go: ok thanks then you go off and buy something else which does stuff by magic seems like to you. Which isnt magic. It does it (the sim wide scan) exactly how Rolig already said except that now you bought it ?!? it dont work seems like, and the maker is nowhere to be found jejejeje (: you should of just bought Roligs one. If it ever stopped working (like never. bc legend scripter) then Rolig is right here every day you egg (: eta; tpyos

whats typically happening is that there are two timers that are not synched with each other, triggering same level animations your timer in your script. and the timer in the AO you will most likely find that while your 1.5 sec synch delay will work with some AO script timers from some makers. It wont with others you get that glitch effect as each timer fires pretty much the only way round this is to put your timer onto a really fast time. and then create a series of micro-length animations. and timestep thru them really quickly in a sequence. it will still glitch sometimes but not as much

DejaHo wrote: When I go to a tailor and I don't know his name I refer to him as Mr. sew and sew. So? so do that needle him when you do that? well it might not. but it might as well when you think about it. so you should ask him. well it cant hurt. asking him. not needlling him just asking. but he might get upset about you asking. so probably not a good idea. well it could be a good idea I suppose if you asked him nicely. well I leave it up to you to decide. but if was me then most likely I will ask him. so I can know if he is upset or not

what the others said already really AR. block. done + ps I got 17 stalkers inworld i am just lucky that way (: i never AR them. Sometimes I block them and then sometimes I unblock them bc I am a bit bored with shopping so I turn them on to see what they ranting about now. I never reply to them either. I dont care enough about them to bother reply or even AR. Like I never got any hater blockers on. Just my dont care blockers on but thats just me tho. For other people who ask about what they should do then I just say AR, block and done + pps some of my stalkers are actual AI bots. Not all of them. Just most of them and that a thing as well. Quite often a person who ends up on these AI bot calling lists, can sometimes think that is a real person stalking them in the IM. bc they say quite nasty things quite often do these AI bots. Then if engage with them then they get even nastier so suggest to people to think back to when they first got that random hater IM. Why did they get it? Like it just came out of nowhere for no reason, from some random account that you never met, never knew, never seen, never even heard of before that first random IM in your box and if the IM hater gets nastier and is pretty much incoherent, when reply to it then is a AI bot. So dont worry enough about it to care. Just AR, block and be happy + somebody (who actual has been on this forums before, and keeps getting banned off it over the years) is the owner of them. That somebody has had a big butthurt hater on for LL ever since they got caught in the great land price crash and end up lost 1000s of RL dollars is why I dont care about them. Is one thing to have a hater on for LL and I can understand that. Is another thing tho to turn that hate onto other users who never had nothing to do with the hater losing their heaps of money + ppps to the somebody who will read this. Young people (teens and 20 somethings) who troll give it (trolling) away after a few years bc they grow up only older people will troll for years and years. Not bc they enjoy trolling. They do it bc of the money. The 1000s of dollars of their money that went down the plughole with older people is always about the money, when they got their haters on

is mostly that a IM is unverifiable. Like I could claim that somebody said something in a IM which isnt true if do want to make a thing against another person then can put on own blog. or on another forums on the internets + eta: what Ren said

you being a teacher then I think that a good place to start is with the works of people like Peter Polson etc Cognitive Walkthrough basically is a design evaluation method that provides feedback from exploration of a new/novel/previous infrequent performed procedure more basically: does the UI lead the person to perform and complete the task. like can the user deduce from the UI what it is they are supposed to do + when get into this then will find that the LL viewer dont do this. Not today anyways. It did actual used to way back in the beginning days. bc all you could do back then pretty much was move (walk/run/fly) and build. Build/mod your avatar. And build/make stuff out of prims which was all functional stuff to do. So could work it (the UI) out pretty quickly to do that. To build then as others came who didnt want to build but to socialise then LL start to add functionality into the viewer to do that. But... they (LL) never done any Cognitive Walkthrough eval on this new capabilities. They just kept adding new functions/capabililties as if these new people were builders. Who even if they didnt want to build, then maybe they should bc that was the whole point. To make content for the world but anyways and sighs. Heres some social functions bc you guys insist, but we see these functions as a adjunct to the main purpose. Which is to build content for our world. Content is good for you the world users, and good for us the world owners and then a bigger but happened ... they (LL) stopped adding new builder capabilities. But (the more bigger but) they kept adding new functions to the UI as if they were still building a viewer for builders. When they werent oo end up with this highly technical UI made for builders/technical people, who dont use it for this anymore. A UI that is struggled to be used by socialisers. They struggle bc the UI is not cognitive of social procedures and processes. And never has been + for a example of what is about then can start here: http://www.researchgate.net/profile/Peter_Polson/publication/252775303_THE_COCKPIT_COGNITIVE_WALKTHROUGH/links/53cec06c0cf2f7e53cf7c97c.pdf

Michaelatv Destiny wrote: I dont agree that "Thousands of people join Second life each day", its the other way round "Thousands leave for thousands to leave then thousands must join

Venus Petrov wrote: So I don't see a problem. well i dont either but others maybe might so dunno

Aethelwine wrote: How do you convert a shoutcast link in to the flashplayer links it uses? for shared media then can use the links at www.streema.com they are http web radio links. so can just copypasta them into a shared media texture and go

Sassy Romano wrote: adverb conjunction pronoun interjection adjective so?? jejejjeje (:

(:

i logged into this RL game once couldnt find anyone anywhere. just lots and lots of empty spaces. with just bare rocks and some trees and grass. and heaps of water sims. Dunno why it had all them water sims. I never seen anyone on them i find out later on from this other person who went on there as well. Apparently what avatars are on that RL game are all on this sim called Delaware. Is like about nearly 7 billion of them just stand there in their 1 meter squares and dont do nothing the person said they tried to get into that Delaware sim. but nah! was full they said. They said was probably a waste of time anyways. They all bots apparently (:

is not all that rare for games and CAD and stuff then the link you gave, lists all the algos that are already used in game/cad/art/design softwares it also lists some algos which arent used all that much bc they dont serve any use other than academic. meaning is not much practical use for some of them

we do want to chat to a avatar on our parcel. Whether there is a avatar on the next parcel or not. So am not sure what is your point about that + a avatar on the next parcel (our neighbour) will accept hearing the chat message when they can see that there is a avatar on our parcel to who the chat is directed what the avatar on the next parcel (our neighbour) wont accept is that when our parcel is empty, a chat message is directed at them due to them (the neighbour) being on their own parcel, and not on ours if we sensor then when the sensor picks them up on their parcel, we have to filter them out so we dont direct our chat at them [when there is no one on our parcel] if we use agentlist on parcel then we will never direct a chat at them. When our agentlist on parcel is empty then no chat. Not ever. No filtering needed either. No matter how many avatars are on the neighbours parcels + i just add a general for anyone who might read this for years LL was asked to provide a reliable no-miss alternative to sensor. for years and years. And eventual they did: llGetAgentList. Is reliable and it dont miss eta: [ ] just to make more clear what I am saying

Supersatan3 wrote: Sadly, SL has become very much like the more conventional HTML internet, Mostly porn and cyber sex. There are tons of artistic sims, but are hardly a drop in the bucket among the filth. like everything in the whole universe, if you go looking for pr0n then you going to find it. If you wallow in filthy then you will come up covered in filthy wallows if your SL is all pr0n and filthy and this saddens you then suggest you get happy and not filthy by turn on your search and map filters there are 1000s and 1000s people in SL every day who are not wallow in filthy or doing the pr0n same on the html internets as well

with sensor the best we can do on a standard 512m (16m x 32m) without going over the boundary is 8m. When do this then we cover less than half our parcel to cover our whole 512m at ground level then put sensor on ground at centre of parcel and set sensor range to: 17.93m 17.93m is the length of the diagonal from the centre of parcel to the top corner of the cube (8m * 16m * 1.2m). 1.2m is a bit over half the max. agent bounding box. So to cap any agents on the ground, on the parcel . If we just set to the diagonal of the plane then the sensor will miss the agent in the corner bc our sensor range is over the boundaries on all 4 sides and also a bit over the diagonal parcels as well, then filter out any agents not on the parcel, and stop when find the first on parcel + if we do this, the question then is how to best do the filtering?

and you shalt be known forever more by Estelle's script as not jean.horten but Jean Horten and i shalt be known forever more as not irihapeti but irihāpeti (: