Hunny Bunny

As mentioned before, the requirement to allow only a group or specific individuals access to the parcel is not applicable to Bellisseria. Turning off avatar visibility is an option, but the stipulation to enclose the area behind walls or visual barriers restricts the full utilization of the parcel, limiting the use of outdoor furniture and amenities. If this is indeed the official policy for adult content in Moderate regions, it is crucial to update the FAQ and other official documentation to reflect these changes. This will ensure that all residents of Second Life are informed about the requirements and prevent confusion, making the information accessible to everyone, not just those who frequent the forums.

Just because it hasn't happened yet doesn't mean it never will.

The presence of three stipulations for having adult content in a moderate region, while only one may be necessary, raises questions about the clarity of the guidelines. If simply turning off parcel visibility is sufficient, why are additional requirements mentioned? Is this information considered top-secret, known only to those who frequent the forums, and shared through subtle hints and nods, or is it something that all residents of Second Life should have access to and be made aware of? This lack of clear and concise information leaves residents uncertain about the exact expectations for compliance.

If Linden Lab knows that any barrier can be cammed past and someone might intrude briefly to capture inappropriate pictures before being ejected, what is the purpose of having these requirements in place?

The majority of users don't purchase an entire region for themselves; instead, they often opt to rent smaller portions of land. On the Mainland, individuals have the flexibility to buy less than a full region, giving them more control over the size and cost of their parcel. However, if Linden Homes are limited to starter homes or if there are no adult Linden Homes available, the only alternative for those seeking adult content is to use their 1024 or 2048 tier to buy an adult parcel. The scarcity of adult parcels on the Mainland has driven up demand, resulting in higher purchase prices that may be unaffordable for many users. As a result, some individuals choose to rent on private regions instead, where they don't need premium or premium+ memberships since they can't fully utilize the tier benefits on the Mainland. This demand for private region rentals allows users to access adult content without the constraints of premium membership, providing an attractive option for those seeking adult-oriented experiences. Focusing on customer satisfaction is crucial for online platforms as it directly impacts customer retention, revenue growth, and brand reputation. A study conducted by Zendesk revealed that a significant 95% of customers share negative experiences with others. Hence, prioritizing customer satisfaction becomes even more imperative for businesses operating in the online sphere.

Based on the three known requirements of the "behind closed doors" policy - limiting parcel access, turning off avatar visibility, and using visual barriers — we have confirmed that limiting parcel access is not possible on Bellisseria does it still apply to the rest of the mainland? Should we fully enclose the pool area or other outdoor furniture with a visible barrier? Considering a walk around the mainland reveals numerous structures built on ground level, covering the entire parcel in an effort to comply with the "behind closed doors" policy or conversely, to obscure the view of ground-level or low-hanging skyboxes used by others to adhere to the same policy. This situation is not encountered on Bellisseria since enclosing the entire parcel is not allowed, does it still apply to the rest of the mainland? We do have the option to turn off parcel visibility on both Bellisseria and the mainland, but the question that remains is whether that is sufficient to satisfy the "behind closed doors" policy. If that is all that is required why are there three requirements and not just one?

The Linden Department of Public Works (LDPW) is a program dedicated to enhancing the experience of residents on the Linden Mainland. The LDPW employs teams of Resident builders, artists, and scripters, affectionately known as the Moles, to create new content and improvements on behalf of Linden Lab, benefiting all users. However, it's important to note that the Moles are not part of the governance team and their opinions may not carry the same weight as official Linden Lab guidelines or policies. While Abnor Mole's statement offers some insights, it may not be sufficient to address issues with a neighbor who holds animosity towards you, especially if you have faced suspension from the platform due to their actions.

Yeah, seems to be the old move the sliders all the way to the right trick.

and made of fine brass.

This is why I maintain that adding more adult land in Second Life would bring forth numerous benefits. It would establish distinct boundaries between areas where adult content is allowed and regions with more general content. This clear demarcation would reduce ambiguity and potential misunderstandings, creating a safer and more comfortable environment for all users. Residents on adult land would enjoy heightened privacy and freedom to express themselves without the burden of excessive security measures. They could freely engage in adult activities without fear of unintentional infractions that might lead to reports or conflicts with neighbors. The creation of dedicated adult regions would cater specifically to users who prefer adult content, providing spaces where like-minded individuals and communities can come together. This sense of community would undoubtedly lead to higher satisfaction and engagement as people find and connect with others who share their interests and preferences. Having these adult regions clearly defined would enable improved enforcement of guidelines, ensuring that adult content remains confined to its designated spaces. This could potentially help in mitigating griefing issues, as the content would be restricted to appropriate areas with willing participants, reducing the misuse of platform rules to target specific individuals. Expanding adult spaces benefits not only those who engage in adult activities but also those who prefer not to participate in such content. By creating more dedicated adult regions, individuals who choose to engage in adult activities would be relocated away from those who don't have an interest in them. This separation allows for a more tailored approach to user preferences, offering zones for general, moderate, and adult content based on individual needs. Having a one-size-fits-all approach may not be truly beneficial, considering the diverse interests and preferences of Second Life users. Instead, having distinct zones for different content types ensures that everyone can find a space that aligns with their comfort level and desired experiences. The current situation highlights an imbalance, with a surplus of abandoned general and moderate land across the grid while adult space remains scarce and disproportionately overpriced. Therefore, the demand for more adult land becomes evident to address this discrepancy and provide a better balance between the different content categories.

An important aspect to consider is how interactions with neighbors can sometimes become complicated. While you may have harmonious relationships with most of them, there's a potential for issues when dealing with individuals who harbor resentment due to rejection or past relationships. In some cases, these individuals might misuse the platform's rules as a means of griefing. They may meticulously follow the rules, seeking the slightest infraction to lodge abuse reports against you. This leaves your fate in the hands of governance, who will have to assess the situation and determine appropriate action.

The question remains, "Does 'every reasonable effort' necessitate all three measures?".

I must express my concern regarding having a home on a moderate parcel instead of an adult parcel. As we know, banlines are not permitted in Bellisseria, making it impossible to achieve the desired level of "behind closed doors" security. While visual enclosures can be utilized inside the house, skybox, or barn, it is not aesthetically pleasing to enclose the entire ground-level parcel and is not possible in Bellisseria. Consequently, various outdoor amenities such as patio furniture, swimming pools, hot tubs, saunas, beach blankets, pool floats, rugs, and even vehicles like floats and boats outside of a houseboat are all off-limits for privacy considerations. The most practical option remaining is turning off avatar visibility, as it is available on all land types. However, it poses a question we cannot answer definitively: "Does 'every reasonable effort' necessitate all three measures?" Without an official written clarification, interpretation becomes the only recourse. In my opinion, having a 1024m parcel where only 1/3 or 1/2 can be fully utilized inside the house and even less in the case of a 2048m house is unreasonable. It results in people building ground-level skyboxes to enclose their entire parcel, which may not be an ideal solution for everyone. In my view, this places an unjust burden on the parcel owner, requiring them to use security measures not primarily for their own protection, but to shield the general public from potential exposure. It feels like locking the parcel owner inside a cage, restricting their freedom to fully utilize the parcel they have paid for. Negotiating around these sensitive issues becomes a constant challenge, preventing us from fully enjoying our parcel as we wish. All these constraints could be effortlessly avoided if the parcel were situated in an adult region.

So is Pepto Bismol and I might be sick. 🤢

Wait, I didn't see any Lindens in this thread!

It's possible that the "behind closed doors" policy has played a role in maintaining a level of activity on the mainland. By allowing adult content to be kept private and not publicly visible, some residents may feel more comfortable expressing themselves or engaging in adult activities in designated areas without impacting the overall public landscape. Personally, I don't consider this an official policy unless it is explicitly stated in the ToS and until then it remains largely unknown to most residents.

Just stick them in a hoodie, they don't even need hair or make them some kind of robot cyberninja and you don't need a head just a weird helmet thing.

I've never expected anyone to refund unused rent. I usually try out a property for a week then increase it if I choose to stay longer which is way easier in SL than RL.

Whether someone is using their main account, an alt, or an alt of an alt should not discourage someone from expressing themselves on a forum. The only thing that matters is that individuals stay true to their own beliefs and ideas, without being influenced by the prevailing opinion, as that would be disingenuous to themselves.

I concur, improving the clarity and conciseness of the Lab's ToS is crucial to avoid any confusion or misunderstandings among users. A more straightforward and transparent ToS would benefit the entire SL community. Additionally, expanding Linden homes and the mainland to include more adult regions could provide a fair and inclusive environment for residents interested in adult content. It's essential to ensure that users who engage in such content are not unfairly burdened or penalized. A balanced approach that respects the diverse interests and preferences of all users is necessary to foster a welcoming and equitable platform for everyone.

As I see it, actions that fall under the definition of "sexually explicit conduct" as provided https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/2256 are generally not allowed in regions designated as General or Moderate. These regions are intended to be family-friendly or suitable for most non-adult activities, respectively. Thus, sexually explicit content or activities, as referenced previously in the link, are not permitted in General or Moderate regions. Although, it has been stated many times on these forums and elsewhere that adult activities are allowed on moderate regions "behind closed doors" as a reason that we don't "need" adult Linden homes. Even if someone from Linden Lab were to say in a community forum that adult content is allowed on moderate-rated land, but it still contradicts what is stated in the Terms of Service (ToS), it would be more prudent to place faith in the written policy outlined in the ToS. The ToS is an official and legally binding document that governs the rules and guidelines for using the Second Life platform. This is why I say err on the side of caution. Regions designated as Adult are intended for hosting and conducting such sexually explicit content or activities. These regions are the appropriate areas where residents can engage in adult-oriented themes and conduct. The Adult designation allows for a more permissive environment that aligns with adult interests and preferences. Therefore, actions described as sexually explicit conduct in the provided link would be restricted to regions specifically designated as Adult in Second Life. Residents seeking to participate in or experience adult content and activities should do so in these Adult-designated regions to comply with Second Life's Community Standards and avoid violating the platform's policies.

I agree and that's why I stated previously:

If the "it" you're referring to is any activity that is sexually explicit then it does define where it's not allowed at all. A region designated General is not allowed to advertise or make available content or activity that is sexually explicit, violent, or depicts nudity.

While I agree it's encouraging the lack of a clear timetable or conclusion is concerning. That's precisely why I persist in advocating for it, even in the face of opposition. We can only achieve progress by continually pushing for what we believe in, and it's essential to keep asking for what we want. I firmly believe this cause is worth fighting for, and I am committed to seeing it through.