Blush Bravin Posted October 9, 2018 Share Posted October 9, 2018 Anyway, I'm out. I've offered my opinion but it's just an opinion like anyone else's. I will wait on a Linden for clarification. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Luna Bliss Posted October 9, 2018 Share Posted October 9, 2018 2 minutes ago, Blush Bravin said: And religious debates can be every bit as toxic as any political discussion. They can be, but I haven't seen it so much here... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blush Bravin Posted October 9, 2018 Share Posted October 9, 2018 1 minute ago, Love Zhaoying said: Yep. We were “sharing” (my words). Not sure who complained about it. I don't remember the exact thread. I just remember that the OP posted about your two derailing his thread and that you should have taken it to private messages. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Luna Bliss Posted October 9, 2018 Share Posted October 9, 2018 3 minutes ago, Love Zhaoying said: Our one “issue” not long ago was a misunderstanding, I think we both agree on a lot. I do tend to overreact. Perhaps was drunk-posting Lion. Well, later on I did wonder that...but was caught up in the moment and not paying enough attention in a deep way...:) 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Love Zhaoying Posted October 9, 2018 Share Posted October 9, 2018 Just now, Blush Bravin said: I don't remember the exact thread. I just remember that the OP posted about your two derailing his thread and that you should have taken it to private messages. Ah, that kind of thread. Yes, non-regulars don’t like it when you go off-topic or post “when they don’t want posts on their thread”. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Luna Bliss Posted October 9, 2018 Share Posted October 9, 2018 2 minutes ago, Blush Bravin said: 4 minutes ago, Love Zhaoying said: Yep. We were “sharing” (my words). Not sure who complained about it. I don't remember the exact thread. I just remember that the OP posted about your two derailing his thread and that you should have taken it to private messages. Let's argue about it all again! lol 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Love Zhaoying Posted October 9, 2018 Share Posted October 9, 2018 1 minute ago, Luna Bliss said: Let's argue about it all again! lol I doubt it was the post where you put the Kali pic. So, I’ve forgotten which one and am ready to move on! Not as memorable as a “PD” argument. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pamela Galli Posted October 10, 2018 Author Share Posted October 10, 2018 Ugh. 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Luna Bliss Posted October 10, 2018 Share Posted October 10, 2018 1 minute ago, Love Zhaoying said: I’ve forgotten which one Well what I don't like is that people break the rules all the time...but if someone is angry with you or they don't like what you're saying then they hit u with the rules...or go all net-nanny-ish and report you. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Love Zhaoying Posted October 10, 2018 Share Posted October 10, 2018 Original post quote: 2 hours ago, Pamela Galli said: Off Topic Content: Please keep your commentary relevant to the discussion and within the format that the forum, board or question and answer area require. (For example, in the Answers section, please follow the Q&A format of the discussion.) Content that is blatantly off topic is not permitted. You may also not post regarding subjects that do not relate to Second Life except in the General forum discussion board. Yet the thread in question was called out due to being a Politics discussion. Common sense, or..need Politics and Religion added as “sensitive topics” in Forum Guidelines? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Luna Bliss Posted October 10, 2018 Share Posted October 10, 2018 5 minutes ago, Pamela Galli said: Ugh. What are you saying 'ugh' about? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blush Bravin Posted October 10, 2018 Share Posted October 10, 2018 (edited) LOL .. I'm crazy .. but I found it. around page 8 or so Edited October 10, 2018 by Blush Bravin how could I forget the experience debate .. lol 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Love Zhaoying Posted October 10, 2018 Share Posted October 10, 2018 Just now, Blush Bravin said: LOL .. I'm crazy .. but I found it. around page 8 or so In some (different, earlier) post, I had read that differebt SL continents were named after Indian gods. You’d think that invites discussion about the why’s and whazzatmean’s! 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Luna Bliss Posted October 10, 2018 Share Posted October 10, 2018 lol Blush, now that we have all matured, how do you define 'experience'? j/k 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Luna Bliss Posted October 10, 2018 Share Posted October 10, 2018 (edited) 2 minutes ago, Love Zhaoying said: In some (different, earlier) post, I had read that differebt SL continents were named after Indian gods. You’d think that invites discussion about the why’s and whazzatmean’s! I'm glad you reminded me...I've been meaning to tell you to read Amercian Veda...it ties it all together (the Vedic influence on America). * I haven't quite finished it...but it's fascinating.. Edited October 10, 2018 by Luna Bliss 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Love Zhaoying Posted October 10, 2018 Share Posted October 10, 2018 Plus..is that thread locked? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blush Bravin Posted October 10, 2018 Share Posted October 10, 2018 Nope. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Luna Bliss Posted October 10, 2018 Share Posted October 10, 2018 When a forum is too restrictive this is off-putting to some. I've known other SL'ers who don't post here because of it. However, I see the other side -- SL should present a sane face without excessively contentious arguing. Hard to strike a balance. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Love Zhaoying Posted October 10, 2018 Share Posted October 10, 2018 Simple idea for evaluating AR for a post: - Does poster have a small number of posts? Perhaps a warning.., unless they have several warnings..in which case a punishment. - Does poster have a large number of Posts, and more “Likes” than posts? Perhaps an overreaction by AR poster or warning..the ratio of likes to posts indicates that they are mostly respected / harmless. - Does poster have a large number of Posts, and less “Likes” than posts? Perhaps this indicates they need some guidance, warning/punishment.. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phorumities Posted October 10, 2018 Share Posted October 10, 2018 If LL doesn't like political posts, then let them make a clear rule NO POLITICS EVER. And on another topic, if you get a forum ban please copy and paste the offending post that got you banned into the notice. I hate getting that form letter... you are banned for abusive and or trolling behavour... well duh, but what exactly did i say hmmmm? Its annoying as hell trying to decide which of a dozen posts got you in trouble, especially when u are waiting out a multi day ban. How can you correct your behavour if you don't know what you did wrong? 3 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fionalein Posted October 10, 2018 Share Posted October 10, 2018 1 minute ago, Love Zhaoying said: Simple idea for evaluating AR for a post: - Does poster have a small number of posts? Perhaps a warning.., unless they have several warnings..in which case a punishment. - Does poster have a large number of Posts, and more “Likes” than posts? Perhaps an overreaction by AR poster or warning..the ratio of likes to posts indicates that they are mostly respected / harmless. - Does poster have a large number of Posts, and less “Likes” than posts? Perhaps this indicates they need some guidance, warning/punishment.. Bad idea, governance like Lady Justice should be blind to fame and favouritism. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Love Zhaoying Posted October 10, 2018 Share Posted October 10, 2018 29 minutes ago, Blush Bravin said: LOL .. I'm crazy .. but I found it. around page 8 or so This is hi-larious! PD’s original post complaining about Luna and I being “off topic” seems to be gone. But it’s quoted! #SealedInAmber Thanks, Blush! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Love Zhaoying Posted October 10, 2018 Share Posted October 10, 2018 5 minutes ago, Fionalein said: Bad idea, governance like Lady Justice should be blind to fame and favouritism. But if they’re only reacting to AR’s, and not all posts / threads, that’s not blind. Meow! <= for emphasis Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Luna Bliss Posted October 10, 2018 Share Posted October 10, 2018 12 minutes ago, Love Zhaoying said: - Does poster have a large number of Posts, and more “Likes” than posts? Perhaps an overreaction by AR poster or warning..the ratio of likes to posts indicates that they are mostly respected / harmless. - Does poster have a large number of Posts, and less “Likes” than posts? Perhaps this indicates they need some guidance, warning/punishment.. You have a lot of likes, Love, but I know you have the potential to be a verrry bad kitty... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Love Zhaoying Posted October 10, 2018 Share Posted October 10, 2018 1 minute ago, Luna Bliss said: You have a lot of likes, Love, but I know you have the potential to be a verrry bad kitty... Um..um..hugs? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Facebook
Instagram
Twitter
YouTube
Flickr
Recommended Posts
Please take a moment to consider if this thread is worth bumping.
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now