Solaria Goldshark

JustBecauseICanBeFriendly wrote: Is it just me, or is Second Life kind of well quiet lately? Just wondering if anyone else is seeing this. For the adventuresome: Pull up the map. Find a collection of green dots. Teleport.

Shocking!

Storm Clarence wrote: I'll start, of course. The best whacking ever in a film: I earlier replied to the best whacking scene, but I may have made a slight error in judgment. I forgot about this one.

Storm Clarence wrote: By category - best opening scene ever! I disagree. While classic, that is just a title shot and not much of a scene. For your consideration......

Best Motivational Speech .....The good news is, you're fired!

Storm Clarence wrote: The best whacking ever in a film: I'll see your whack and raise you a whack..... Nothing quite as scary as a psychotic with a philosophy.

Storm Clarence wrote: Do you change that dull canned wording to something more personal? yes.

Dresden Ceriano wrote: Hello. *waves* ...Dres Almost two days.....Mission accomplished.

PookeyBear wrote: 25 people in an area are going to use different viewers so 25 peope are going to see everyone differently :robotwink: 7 Billion people or more on the planet, and 7 Billion people are going to see everyone, and everything, differently. ......and 7 Billion all use different viewers. And it's pretty damn cool.

RorickVolsung wrote: How do you transfer feelings or personality to aesthetics? That is a very good question. .....and to follow that question up I would have to ask, how attached will your feelings and emotions be to what you might eventually create? Pick a character you might create expressed as your avatar: Vampire, dog, school girl, demon, soccer mom, businessman, angel, hipster, slacker, Martian, cowboy, neko (endangered species btw), robot.......whatever you choose. At some point you may find yourself begin to identify with your creation, and this is where your imagination is required. If you chance to take your creation into some roleplay you might find that you loose yourself in your creation, for however long it lasts. You may find that you expose to yourself new feelings or personality traits to match your aesthetics. I don't think you transfer feelings or personality to a character quite as much as those feelings and personalities are transferred back to you in some regard. In many instances you are always you, limited only by how much of yourself you are willing to discard for the moment. Then again...you could just be you. In which case we'd just have ourselves a great big fancy chat room. I'll take characters, imagination, and a sense of adventure.

"Pardon my French, but Cameron is so tight that if you stuck a lump of coal up his ass, in two weeks you'd have a diamond." Ferris Bueller

Storm Clarence wrote: Solaria Goldshark wrote: .......kind of like, "we're gonna need a bigger boat" Did Goldshark just make a Jaws reference? Great post, Solaria. Very clever. One for you kind Sir. "Hey, Careful, Man, There's a beverage here!" The Dude

"Say hello to my little friend"

Kylie Jaxxon wrote: "You had me at hello" This is what I say when I walk into a car dealership. It's best to keep me out of those places.

"Where we're going, we don't need roads"

"We should have shotguns for this kind of deal" Jules, Pulp Fiction .......kind of like, "we're gonna need a bigger boat" Did Goldshark just make a Jaws reference?

Kudos. .....It's some kind of chewy granola bar, or some kind of compliment.

Blind as a bat. .....This makes no sense. Bats use radar. I think this one might be a compliment.

In the dog house. .....you might find your husband there.

Pig in a poke. ......I think it's a good thing.

Sh...ting in tall cotton. ......offers both privacy and a bit of fluffiness.

Rosen Janus wrote: The marketplace is already unfairly geared in favor of the vendor. It seems.. every time I don't give a FULL FIVESTAR "OMG THIS PRODUCT IS THE EPITOME OF MY EXISTENCE" review, the creator (and this usually always happpens with women) comes to bite my head off and try to bully me into changing my review! Of course even if I don't, the review seems to magically disaapear the next day! (again, the system is unfairly geared in favor of the vendor) The company I work for in another life has a nice website that details our product and services. We offer the opportunity for people to post a comment or review. The administrator of this particular site has final authority to approve what ultimately gets posted. In every commercial venture there will be unhappy customers. It should be no surprise that every commercial enterprise will do their very best to put their best foot forward to help bolster the image of their product or services. This is not to say that negative reviews are not of any concern, they are, but I sure wouldn't want the odd unhappy consumer to put a dent in my bottom line. I find this practice not in the least dishonest or unfair to those with a complaint. My personal practice is this: I offer praise and thank you, and job well done where appropriate, for those times I feel grateful for the product or service I receive. I let the negative review happen when I vote with my pocketbook and move on and never use that service or buy that product again. I find no value personally for a vitriolic review. I challenge you for the next year to never write a bad review. The only review you should write are to those whose products you like.....I dare you.

Coby Foden wrote: With RL sizing of content everybody would win. . I'll let the tiny avie population know that this is a win, win situation for all involved. .....next?