Jump to content

FinnfinnLost

Resident
  • Content Count

    47
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by FinnfinnLost

  1. To be fair, with all the stuff added (and some removed) as well as the interface overhaul in 2.8 and 2.9, it might as well be its own major version. They're just numbers after all.
  2. @OptimoMaximo means you need to scale the stuff you need to the size that you need. I presume Cinema 4D will be offering you some options when importing files, maybe play around with those a bit. It may be some quirk in the file, maybe link where exactly you got your skeleton from.
  3. I'm gonna prefer the bandwagen that includes "recommending a switch to a software that costs >2000€ per year unless you buy 3 years in advance is not good advice for a single request for something that's apparently easy to work without". Whichever that might be.
  4. Uh, not at all. Can't see a thing with the wireframe all over the place. Maybe someone else can make sense of this?
  5. Always kinda difficult to tell from screenshots alone. We can't really see where exactly those bones are. From here it looks like the eyebrows aren't all that well placed, especially eyebrow inner? Bit at a loss here. Not all that experienced with rigging either.
  6. Looking at the bento reference, it could work. I'd say rig it and play with the pose a bit. For testing purposes, automatic weights should give you a rough idea.
  7. Okay, okay. What do you want here? Do you just not want to move the camera yourself and make screenshots? Is there some other issue? I'm very confused.
  8. Granted. Can't quite shed the developer's perspective. I'll try harder from now on.
  9. Yes, but it CAN be used to make more efficient content. What if a creator realizes that a small object isn't recognizable at longer distances regardless of quality, even at very high resolutions? In that case, deciding to not render it at all might be the better option. I'll concede that whatever performance advantage is there is probably not worth the LI exploits that would happen.
  10. Rotate them around a bit and find out which parts move. Then you'll have their functions fired out in no time.
  11. As a learning project, sure. But if it already exists, and you got lots of stuff to model, why not take a shortcut there?
  12. I am well aware. Putting tri limits to zero seems to be a very fun thing for many creators to do. I was merely pointing out that, while it would be great to force artists to make at least somewhat acceptable LODs, the possibility of zeroing out must remain.
  13. Since you're presuming stuff now for the whole purpose of mocking me for an argument that I DID NOT EVEN BRING UP, nor was I planning to, I think we're done here. Back to topic, I actually thought of something else. Zeroing out LODs is, something that should remain, even if strict tri limits on custom ones would be enforced. There's a performance advantage to be had when not rendering small things at long or even medium distance at all.
  14. Sorry, but the last part is absolutely messed up. You're creating art for an interactive experience that is expected to be smooth. You can't just claim you're being held back by programmers and be done with it. If one thinks it's justified chucking HUGE amounts of model and textures at people and then going "Ah, but the engine should be SO MUCH BETTER", at this point it's not even an engine limitation anymore. No matter the engine, 1 GB of textures for one single models is entirely not feasible for any hardware but the most high-end stuff. Quite frankly, I find your disrespect for pr
  15. I write code for a living. Not in the graphics department, but certain principles still apply. Also, it's great that id did it. But as a content creator it is your job to make sure you work WITH the engine, not churn out stuff that bogs it down and then insist on changes in the implementation. Sure, you can ask for features or optimizations. But as long as you're not absolutely certain these features or optimizations will be available to you, it's your responsibility to create stuff that works with what is there right here and now, even if it is suboptimal. Especially since we are in a pr
  16. Looks pretty good and has lots of potential for customization if you ask me. Although I don't particularly care about torpedo breasts. There should really be some generous hard limit on tris for an avatar.
  17. That's a logical fallacy if I ever saw one. You can read a 2GB text file in chunks if whatever algorithm you're running on it allows it. If you want to draw a model then you need the entire model and textures in memory, preferably the graphics card's. Yes, texture streaming is a thing. But you still gotta render whatever is on screen. Furthermore, there are numerous bottlenecks that have nothing to do with the game code, but the GPU's pipeline and the connection to the rest of the system. If the memory bus can't keep up, you get long delays before a high-quality texture can be rendered. I
  18. Thanks for the numbers and example images. Those figures do look pretty good for a body and yes, with proper LOD handling that would give decent performance while still giving a good amount of detail. Those system heads look pretty good. They could use some more geometry around the cheek bones and the chin, if you ask me, but other than that they're cool.
  19. Don't see anything that would prevent it at first glance. Would have to convert it, upload it and then apply the textures and ideally create a physics model.
  20. That would be very interesting indeed, but for it to work we'd require the actual source file without any changes that may have been made by the SL uploader. Ideally, it would be pre-triangulation as well, makes examining the topology easier. At least for me. I highly doubt the more popular body creators would agree anyway, what with compromising a large part of their work.
  21. @Gabriele Graves Different workflows exist, but you are mostly correct: Overall, optimization will probably lead to less complex models. However, during optimization you can also notice that additional geometry's required to refine certain spots. When reducing geometry you're also able to add more in case you need more detail. Ideally, you'll simplify the mesh to the point where you can afford subdividing the whole model to make it smoother. It may seem counter-intuitive at first, but bear with me: Subdividing basically means turning a quad (a four-edged face) into four ones, by extension
  22. I appreciate the elaboration. And yes, I can see how alpha cuts would increase the complexity. HOWEVER: Stretching textures have little to do with the amount of geometry. I can stretch a triangle to oblivion and back and as long as I have a long texture with good UVs, it's going to look crisp. So you can ignore those stretching textures for the purpose of this discussion. I looked at Ellie from The Last of Us and all I see is lower resolution due to technical limitations, no stretching due to faulty UVs. This leaves features specific to SL. With the example Ellie, with her clocking in at
  23. ... this is not acceptable. At all. I usually try to stay friendly and any newbie to 3D is going to produce way too complex models, I was the same. So, as a disclaimer: If you produce models like these, but are trying to improve, don't feel bad. I'm still working on it as well and am nowhere near the optimization skills I desire. But this is a character model that the creator is generating no small amount of income from. If I purchase a model for a videogame, I can expect a certain quality. Yes, I've looked at the body and yes, it's a very pretty model. But this is ludicrous. She has abou
  24. This. I'd say stick below 10k. I'd recommend making a really low-poly version as your first "production-ready" version. Enable smooth shading and see if it resembles the shape you're going for. Rig it and see if it deforms properly. With your basic topology in place, add more geometry and detail until you're happy or hit your maximum tri count. More subtle details can be added via normal maps without increasing the amount of geometry. Are you using Blender? If so, I can share some personal experience that could help.
×
×
  • Create New...