ChinRey Posted January 25, 2021 Share Posted January 25, 2021 (edited) Take a look at this picture: It's a corner of a to floor store I'm working on with the second floor still missing so you can compare the walls downstairs and upstairs. Do you notice how much darker the lower half of the wall is? It isn't. The top and bottom half of the wall have exactly the same texture and the illusion shatters when I break the continuity: I'm sure we've all seen lots of similar optical illusion but I never thought I'd accidentally create one myself. More important, there's something we need to be aware of as SL content creators that is so easy to forget: We do not see with our eyes, we see with our brains! The eyes only capture some very basic info and it's up to the brain to try to make sense of it. It's all about context; what looks good in Blender or Maya may not look good in SL and the same item may even look completely different in different scenes in SL. Edited January 25, 2021 by ChinRey 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
arton Rotaru Posted January 25, 2021 Share Posted January 25, 2021 On first glance to me it looked like a much larger room. I thought the lower wall was horizontally extended from the wood planks. The difference in brightness is even weirder. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kyrah Abattoir Posted January 26, 2021 Share Posted January 26, 2021 A good texture memory saving technique too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Quarrel Kukulcan Posted January 26, 2021 Share Posted January 26, 2021 6 hours ago, ChinRey said: Do you notice how much darker the lower half of the wall is? Um...no? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChinRey Posted January 26, 2021 Author Share Posted January 26, 2021 19 minutes ago, Quarrel Kukulcan said: Um...no? Aww. Try this then. This is from wikipedia's article about optical illusions, showing the same effect: The squares marked A and B are exactly the same color and shade. We can prove it by connecting them: 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Quarrel Kukulcan Posted January 26, 2021 Share Posted January 26, 2021 To clarify: you're saying region B looks darker to you than region A? Because it doesn't to me. If anything, the bottom looks slightly lighter, but that's not an illusion -- my LCD monitor changes brightness when viewed from different vertical angles. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Prokofy Neva Posted February 9, 2021 Share Posted February 9, 2021 On 1/25/2021 at 3:07 PM, ChinRey said: Take a look at this picture: It's a corner of a to floor store I'm working on with the second floor still missing so you can compare the walls downstairs and upstairs. Do you notice how much darker the lower half of the wall is? It isn't. The top and bottom half of the wall have exactly the same texture and the illusion shatters when I break the continuity: I'm sure we've all seen lots of similar optical illusion but I never thought I'd accidentally create one myself. More important, there's something we need to be aware of as SL content creators that is so easy to forget: We do not see with our eyes, we see with our brains! The eyes only capture some very basic info and it's up to the brain to try to make sense of it. It's all about context; what looks good in Blender or Maya may not look good in SL and the same item may even look completely different in different scenes in SL. When I see things like this when trying to match wallpaper it drives me crazy. And I think if I take a snapshot, the camera can't lie, I might suffer from optical illusions but it won't. But often the camera captures the exact same differentiation in colours and shadows on identical texture at identical tiling, which I suppose comes from the lighting of SL itself or something. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Profaitchikenz Haiku Posted February 9, 2021 Share Posted February 9, 2021 That's a good point about the camera not lying, but equally, it can't support the human visual experience, so if an optical illusion works I'd go for it in preference to using camera pictures to mix and match shades. It's us that are going to live with and appreciate the result, cameras are just ephemera-generators. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please take a moment to consider if this thread is worth bumping.
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now