- 0
Who the F thought kudos was a good sort order?
You are about to reply to a thread that has been inactive for 4796 days.
Please take a moment to consider if this thread is worth bumping.
Please take a moment to consider if this thread is worth bumping.
Question
PeterCanessa Oh
There is no excuse for thinking the only available sort orders in answers should be 'newest first' (which every who commented hates) and 'most kudos' (which is meaningless at best and makes it impossible to follow the logic of a thread). This is unusable.
There are MANY comments in feedback from experienced - and high-ranked, for what it's worth - residents saying they need to see the thread in 'oldest first' order.
SO - Who is responsible for this? Who ignored, or didn't bother to read, all the comments and feedback? Who thought 'random' was a good thread order?
EDIT: Thanks for that, so it's become even more extra clicks for every single thread *sigh*. Heading in the wrong direction fast. I don't appear to be able to reply to my own question either, so I'm editing here. Also screws-up on IE8. Not fit for purpose so I'll leave it until it's fixed. Most unhappy.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
7 answers to this question
Recommended Posts
Please take a moment to consider if this thread is worth bumping.
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now