Jaylinbridges
-
Posts
1,511 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Forums
Blogs
Knowledge Base
Posts posted by Jaylinbridges
-
-
1 hour ago, Quartz Mole said:
Folks, this thread has needed yet another clean-up -- the third since it started.
Could you start a new section in the forum for all these missing posts you clean up every day? Some of us have other jobs and need to take naps (cause we are old) and miss all the trash. It would be read-only of course. You could even black out the names.
-
1
-
1
-
-
5 hours ago, Sid Nagy said:
A circus comes to town.
Simply wait until show time when one is not part of the organization.That is an incorrect analogy, showing you don't understand the background issue here at all. The OP felt slighted for having a project that competed somewhat with the BBB, and basically the BBB won. Nothing really to do with the 5 yr Belli celebration, but an opportunity to rant a bit for her. There are always winners and losers. Nothing to see here. Congratulations to the people who have worked since the very beginning to create social events for Belli residents (and anyone in SL since no membership cards needed to visit Belli events).
A first day Bellisseria resident.
-
2
-
1
-
-
4 minutes ago, Silent Mistwalker said:
To protect from legal actions against owners/employees. Not that Brad would sue himself, but others would, so it is best to not use his real name
I don't think we have a court system inside SL to sue Lindens. Not even an elected judge.
That Brad Oberwager is also Oberwulf Linden is not a closely guarded secret. There must be more to this, sniff sniff...
-
2
-
-
Good thing archive.org is not owned by LL or Chase. We need history to understand the future.
-
1
-
2
-
-
What's the per cent of SL accounts that do not have any PIOF? Most bots, many alts, and those that earn their way working in SL do not need PIOF. All you need are lindens, from other residents or games.
I would guess 40% non PIOF accounts, No idea if that is close.
-
Peeve - I fell asleep BTL. True story -
I had been consuming all the trash on all those blogs and here, about the AP issue for 12 hrs. It was just before the cactus became the pointy subject, that I was thinking if I had any child avatars. Since shortness seemed to be part of the definition, I pulled out my eggplant avatar, and noted it would reach to 4.8 feet height, from feet to stem. I was going to post my picture. Had never thought the difference between a cactus and an eggplant would have been in the thread. But here's the question anyway. Is this a child or adult eggplant, and do I need to remove my Adult furniture when wearing it around the ranch?
-
5
-
-
2 minutes ago, Cristiano Midnight said:
SAP is sexual *****. It has been used enough in this thread that I didn’t feel the need to spell it out. No need to be flippant about it.
Thanks, I knew what AP was since in this thread everyone thinks SAP = AP.
I found SAP in google to be Sexual Abuse Pastor, so blame the Google AI for not knowing.
-
1
-
-
39 minutes ago, Cristiano Midnight said:
It does not matter if the participants are adults only. It is considered the production of CSAM under these laws.
You are right that people have all kinds of depraved fantasies. To each their own in most cases. In the specific case of SAP, it is a different
Not all of us are experts in sexual abuse terms. CSAM and SAP mean nothing to me.
I found CSAM - the new term for child pornography - Child Sexual Abuse Material (CSAM)
But what is SAP. Sexual Abuse Pastor? Maybe SL should ban churches.
Why does SL think private agep1ay among adults to be CSAM, if it is NOT being distributed as child porn, and in fact nobody sees it except the consenting adults in real-time? Just seems like the wrong term to me.
-
2
-
-
15 minutes ago, Persephone Emerald said:
In SL the term is generally taken to mean that at least one avatar appears to be a minor involved in simulated sex, but this is not the actual definition of the term. In RL, it refers to an adult roleplaying as a different age and engaging with another adult. It might or might not involve sexual activity.
Thank You , good Wiki link for RL AgeP1ay. SL's definition is entirely different for sexual AP among adults than in RL.
From that WIKI,
I guess this only proves that online game players are all perverts, based on their rules.
-
2
-
2
-
-
1 hour ago, BilliJo Aldrin said:
I’ve seen porn where the woman looks underage but there is a disclaimer, per statutory code blah blah blah all performers are over 18, proof is on file as required by law.
Perhaps LL needs a similar system, if you wanna ***** you need to file proof with LL that you are over 18 and reference that requirement in your profile.
Even if you can prove you are over 18, it still makes any AP illegal in SL. RL age has nothing to do with it, from my reading of the LL TOS on AP. There seems to some confusion, that if both are RL adults in SL and one or both is Role Playing with a child looking avatar, that this is allowed. It is allowed in RL in most US states, but it is illegal in SL to wear an under 18 looking avatar in SL and have sex.
You can be 90 yrs old and your partner 96 yrs old in RL, and you are still in risk of losing your SL account. Strange how libido fades naturally with age, and possible neither of the 90 yr olds can get it up in their RL, especially if you live alone. Although I would think an avatar looking at least 21 might work. But who knows, maybe the only good sex they ever had in their life was when they were teenagers, and so they are trying to bring those memories back in SL.
https://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/Linden_Lab_Official:Clarification_of_policy_disallowing_ageplay
-
20 minutes ago, BilliJo Aldrin said:
So if two adults in RL want to pretend one of them is a child, and they have sex, is it a crime?
No, not according to the document exceptions that was posted. Scroll back, I did not copy it in my post.
20 minutes ago, BilliJo Aldrin said:Supposed they recorded it and posted it online. Is it a crime?
Yes of course it is a crime, that is one of several things that makes it a crime.
20 minutes ago, BilliJo Aldrin said:Suppose one of them is petit and could be mistaken for being under the age of consent are they commiting a crime?
Only if she cannot prove she is at the age of consent. States where prostitution is legal require you prove your age with a state issued official birth certificate and photograph and drivers license. Age is not a matter of appearance in RL.
There are many men (Johns) sitting in jail, or on sex offender lists for life, because they were lied to by a young woman who claimed she was over 18, and was only 16. So verify age, or don't fool around.
-
2
-
-
10 minutes ago, Sid Nagy said:
Where did I put my Elvis ID card, that I bought on EBay years ago, again?
So you used your fake Elvis ID to get your Process Credit account approved?
-
So what I gather here is that a*eplay is NOT illegal in RL among adult humans, as long as it does not trigger one of the illegalities listed in that above definition. BUT THIS IS ILLEGAL in SL among avatars, unless your shape is acceptable, despite total privacy?
In other words if two consenting ADULTS who are also married, decide to change to a child avatar, (tween or teen or Furry), in the privacy of their own SL bedroom to engage in adult sex, at 3950m high, with zero second security orbs, on a private Adult region , where no public access is allowed, this is still illegal and a perma ban offense according to the LL TOS? No personal privacy at all?
LL Governance or LL VP's can watch everything you do in private, and read all your IM's and make videos if they would choose to. You are relying on the very large chance they are not targeting you, to escape detection here? This needs to be spelled out explicitly in the LL TOS. Most AP is among consenting adults and is in private. Adult, over 18 in RL being the key word here. Age verification should be mandatory for Adult status, as it once was.
-
1
-
-
14 minutes ago, Scylla Rhiadra said:
That said, that's precisely what we can't talk about here, for a number of reasons, not least of which is that we have almost no information, other than some fairly suspect allegations, upon which to base such a discussion. And so we are reduced to talking, once again, about the general phenomenon of a*eplay on the platform, what it looks like, how to deal with it, etc.
My post count here is 12, and most are one liners. I did start the roosters in the hen house analogy, which led to cute mole photos (by others), dinosaur evolution theories, and my revelation of the SL Moles secret meeting place. But my snapshot of that has not been featured yet. (: Are those moles fake?
Anything on the real topic I cannot discuss here. Even the blanket claims by some cannot be refuted. Lots of misdirection here lately.
-
2
-
-
26 minutes ago, Sid Nagy said:
Moles are only tiny animals. In size somewhere between a mouse and a rat.
The chance that a chicken even bites a mole by accident is far bigger, than the other way around.You have obviously never seen a Linden mole. Here they are planning their next raid at their secret hideout in the Realms. That's me sitting on the head of the Head Mole. They have many secrets to tell.
-
2
-
-
18 minutes ago, Love Zhaoying said:
One problem with that analogy is, you can extend it to say the entire problem is the animals (furries). In this situation, LL is the farmer
We need a lion or two to keep the foxes away. Do moles eat chickens, or just worms?
-
1
-
-
If the fox is guarding the hen house, eats all the chickens, and replaces them with roosters, will the farmer notice the loss of eggs?
Hypothetical question of course. I should ask an AI bot.
-
3
-
1
-
-
10 minutes ago, Scylla Rhiadra said:
Was it one of the posts removed because it was "off topic," and about RL sexual abuse?
Yep, not God. lol
I pointed out the origins of LL started in downtown San Francisco, a block from the gay bars.
And that the LL management makeup did not reflect worldwide RL sexual abuse data, at all, since most of the founders and early employees were men.Or something like that. Related to the "we can't discuss the blog post content" rather directly.
-
2 minutes ago, Luna Bliss said:
not supposed to talk about God or religion on the forum...sorry..
The word was not God... was joke?
-
1
-
-
Pet Peeve - I make ONE POST in the last 20 hours in THAT thread, and it gets removed in 10 mins. I mentioned a 3 letter word that starts with G, and wasn't bragging about myself. Was hardly off topic. Not a record I expect, but close.
-
2 hours ago, Silent Mistwalker said:
I am dinosaur! Hear me roar!
Your were raising chickens for food? Thought green dinosaurs were vegetarians.
-
3 minutes ago, QuietEventide said:
It sure didn't take long to get calls to be silenced for speaking truth.
Truth has nothing to do with it. It is against the forum rules to discuss Real World issues. Maybe you missed when that went into effect. Your post will probably be removed.
-
3
-
2
-
-
12 minutes ago, BilliJo Aldrin said:
That doesn’t tell me much without their SL names attached.
Sorry you didn't get invited to the FIC. You can find out linden and RL names for top managers in the original blog post. Or deduce that information by looking at job titles. No secrets, just cannot say any names here, by order of the Chief.
-
1
-
-
The Linden Lab management team photos and titles are back up, as of March 10, 2024. Reported by Inara Pey on her blog.
Minus two this time. There was also a promotion in January 2024 of one of the management team VP's. Can't say names here, even though this is all public information from LL on their website. Marketing was added to his job titles.
Stay tuned in, as they say in radio.
-
2
-
2
-
Facebook
Instagram
Twitter
YouTube
Flickr
Did You Know That….
in General Discussion Forum
Posted
If you set your hover height to -2.00, you hide under the floor/ground. This fools newbies usually - they think you are invisible.