Ciaran Laval Posted April 12, 2011 Share Posted April 12, 2011 I haven't been paying much attention to inworld search lately but tonight decided it was about time I took a look at how the land lies, performing a search that results in over 1,000 results, I find on page one parcels as small as 320M, so is this a freak result or has the parcel size weighting disappeared again? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Imnotgoing Sideways Posted April 13, 2011 Share Posted April 13, 2011 In my point of view, it never happened. My two mainland stores are both on obscure 512 parcels and rarely if not never had a problem landing page 1, even with competition like Curious Kitties and Dilly Dolls. () Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Couldbe Yue Posted April 13, 2011 Share Posted April 13, 2011 hmmm interesting. Sea did say anything over 144sqm should show so perhaps they did fix it. I have three parcels I can check but they'll take a couple of days as I'll have to put one back in search first. As an aside, one way you can check to see if you've fallen foul of the maturity ratings filter is to check the page and look for these meta name="robots" content="noindex, nofollow"meta name="boost" content="-1" / meta name="mat" content="PG_NOT" / If you have then check your objects that show in search as there'll be a naughty word in either the object name or description. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phil Deakins Posted April 13, 2011 Share Posted April 13, 2011 Negative boosts are acquired for various reasons and not just for naughty bits. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Couldbe Yue Posted April 13, 2011 Share Posted April 13, 2011 I'm sure that anyone who is aware of what negative boost is will be well aware of that Phil. That's why the thread is primarily about the parcel size handicap that was previously applied. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ciaran Laval Posted April 13, 2011 Author Share Posted April 13, 2011 Imnotgoing Sideways wrote: In my point of view, it never happened. My two mainland stores are both on obscure 512 parcels and rarely if not never had a problem landing page 1, even with competition like Curious Kitties and Dilly Dolls. () It definitely happened, I had a shed load of small parcels that disappeared into oblivion in search terms when people started discussing the large parcel bias. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ciaran Laval Posted April 13, 2011 Author Share Posted April 13, 2011 Couldbe Yue wrote: meta name="mat" content="PG_NOT" / If you have then check your objects that show in search as there'll be a naughty word in either the object name or description. What should it say there? content ="PG"? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Couldbe Yue Posted April 13, 2011 Share Posted April 13, 2011 Ciaran Laval wrote: Couldbe Yue wrote: meta name="mat" content="PG_NOT" / If you have then check your objects that show in search as there'll be a naughty word in either the object name or description. What should it say there? content ="PG"? Afaik it should just say PG. if you check profiles that's the way they hide the naughty ones - they put _NOT so I'm assuming it's the same for listings, since that pg one has it. I have a naughty word in one of the vendors that I need to remove, then I'll be able to see if the boost penalty has gone. Although I'm not too optimistic as I have an adult parcel as well that still has -ve boost and it's got nothing apparent for the reason except for its size. Sea did give a tip to get that animation store of mine properly ranked, apparently it was this page rank bug. I'll find out tonight when I finally get inworld. If the tip is right then it will be the first time it's appeared for that search term since last may.. so a big possible yay! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darrius Gothly Posted April 13, 2011 Share Posted April 13, 2011 Parcel Rating consists of two datum separated by an underscore '_'. The first will be one of: PG - Currently called "General" but was previously called "PG" M - Currently called "Moderate" but was previously called "Mature" AO - Currently called "Adult", same as previously The second will be one of the following: (blank) - No additional meaning (In this case the dividing underscore is also missing) NOT - Indicates that Maturity Rating of guests is not checked before entry is allowed AO - Indates that guests must have Adult Verification to enter the parcel BAN - Indicates the parcel has been banned for abuse of Adult or Mature keywords Common values you will see are: PG_NOT - General rating and entry allowed to all guests M_NOT - Moderate rating and entry allowed to non-teen guests M_AO - Moderate rating but Adult Verification required for entry AO_NOT - Adult rating but Adult Verification not required by Land Options AO_AO - Adult rating and Adult Verification required for entry PG_BAN - Shame on you! Wash your mouth out wif soap! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Facebook
Instagram
Twitter
YouTube
Flickr
Recommended Posts
Please take a moment to consider if this thread is worth bumping.
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now