Jump to content

Pierre Ceriano

Resident
  • Posts

    119
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Pierre Ceriano

  1. All geek jobs being provided , I shall give them law counseling :matte-motes-nerdy: While I often appear critical, I use this thread to say that LL did a good job overall. Sincerely. Best regards Pierre Ceriano
  2. Main subject because the permission system (and beyond intellectual property) on objects, scripts of textures influence the current economic situation of virtual goods market. From my point of view, LL must first seek to eradicate the inworld copyboting and the illegal importation of objects from the outside. How can assume have the right to sell (and therefore allow permissions) products that have been stolen or imported without license ? Then I think the permission system is pretty much done. It could be improved by providing two levels of modify changes. That which we know and one which would only authorizes to modify the dimensions of the object (not textures). This would avoid the use of added scripts and respect the artistic choice of the creators. Then indeed it would authorize the transfer between alts. We do not pay twice its underpants or rent to my knowledge. I'm not against it. Remains to find the technical means to control this. The licenses are too important to let them the sole use of the creators (yes I am creator and I support this view.) LL should provide a preformatted form that complies with international trade laws. A sort of "fill the gap". Here are my initial reactions and thoughts on this subject. Warm regards Pierre Ceriano
  3. Hello everyone and thank you all for bringing your opinion on the sensitive subject : Marketplace / Inworld shop. I will only give my own opinion. I understand and respect the opinions of others. I just feel that the behavior of some, the casualness of others and the lack of decision-making of LL (on this point), are sawing off the branch on which we already are in balance. [0 - Sorry in advance for my bad English, I try to do my best ^^] 1 - I both manage a MarketPlace and an inworld shop. I consider this is a sign of respect for my customers that offer them to see some of my products rezzed on the game. I also consider that it would be unacceptable behavior on my part to save dough on Marketplace without participating financially in the game itself. Do not forget that LL puts at our disposal a free tool : that will be ethically unacceptable to enrich yourself without giving the game counterparty. 2 - I have a MarketPlace store because it is a way to be largely known. 3 - I also consider that selling low cost items on the MarketPlace without having an inworld activity (and so costs) causes severe distortion of competition. 4 - The notion of "distortion of competition" should be taken into great consideration by the LL as it is a legal notion. 5 - If LL wants the return of the ingame trafic, they will have to take in consideration the commercial side of this distortion and act in favor of inworld shopkeepers. As some other things to do but off present topic. 6 - I globaly feel like Shab about this probelm but I disegree with the idea of being membership to get a MarketPlace 7 - My idea is : NO INWORLD SHOP = NO MARKETPLACE STORE. Should develop the details of the setting up but if some of you want to lobby about this way or such a way like, i would join or create the movement. As i already have good contact with known and emerging disigners, do not hesitate to contact me inworld Warm regards Pierre Ceriano
  4. In relation to this kind of attack , I raise the issue of the lack of any "TOS violation" reason under the "Flag this item" button on the MarketPlace : thread. Thank you in advance for your attention Pierre Ceriano
  5. Anybody can explain to me the reason why there is not a "TOS violation" reason under the "Flag this item" button ? I refer especialy to the point 8.3 of the TOS : "8.3 You agree that you will not post or transmit Content or code that may be harmful, impede other users' functionality, invade other users' privacy, or surreptitiously or negatively impact any system or network." For sample isn't a bomb script (usually called sim crasher), sold actually on the MP, responding to "you will not [...] transmit Content or code that may [...] negatively impact any system" ? This is a sample among others. I open the debate, would like to read you opinion and gather all persons who want to give a chance to the "Tos violation" reason" under the "Flag this item" button.
  6. Pierre Ceriano offers an exchange service with an English speaking translator : Pierre Ceriano will translate into French notecards, MarketPlace files and weblogs ; the English speaking translator will do the same with notecards, MarketPlace and weblogs of Pierre. There is no exchange of L$ but only one service against another. Important : it is not necessary for the translator to be French speaking, he or she will just have to revise English versions. Contact Pierre Ceriano directly on the game or by mail : [pierre.ceriano@orange.fr] [Hiring page] [Main Shop] [MarketPlace]
  7. Nana Saenz needs a commercial agent whose main tasks will be to look for business locations and event to install and promote products from Nana. The mastery of one or more foreign languages is a plus. He/She must know and follow the trends of sales and marketing in Second Life. For the method of payment, see directly with Nana Saenz on the game. [Hiring page] [Main Shop] [MarketPlace]
×
×
  • Create New...