Nofunawo

https://gpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/Nvidia-GTX-1650-vs-AMD-Radeon-880M/4039vsm2332825 and the same problem again: No VRAM, only shared RAM: Slower and RAM is "stolen" from the CPU.

AMD Ryzen 5 5600H uses a RX Vega 7, which isn't good for any gaming. Like pretty much every integrated "GPU" it has no VRAM and is good as a crutch to run a few games with the lowest settings, but nothing more.

This comparison has a big mistake. Of course, a much faster graphics card consumes unlimited more power, but it also delivers more FPS. But most likely you will limit the FPS. It makes little sense to let a 4090 run unlimited to achieve > 1000 FPS in SL. This diagramm is from a german website and shows the performance per watt with a 144 FPS limit in a mix of different games: The following diagrams show which graphics card's power costs are incurred per hour of gaming with a 144 FPS limit (assumption 37,37 Euro Cent per kWh) Of course, this is only a comparison of power consumption and does not take into account the purchase price of a card. For the price of a 4090, which is completely over-dimensioned for SL, you can use a lot of power with a cheaper card. What is clear is that the 4xxx series is far superior to the 3xxx series in terms of efficiency. This also applies to AMD and especially Intel cards.

What about: https://marketplace.secondlife.com/p/ZHAO-II-Seamless-Sit-ZHAO-Variant/418931

FSR in OpenGL is a simple fit? Please explain...

🤣

Or if the Wifi doesn't manage the 3000kpbs it's maybe the time rethinking the network.

The maximum bandwith is only related to UDP traffic. Most (99%) of the traffic in SL is no more UPD traffic these days. Textures, inventory and and are handled via HTTP connections to the AWS servers. The old information, that can still be found on many sites, about not going over 500 or hell will freeze over, no longer fits in with today's Internet speeds. The maximum setting in FS is 3000Kbps, which is equivalent to 3Mbps - so basically nothing. In other viewers it is higher (Alchemy 6000 - AFAIK). Nevertheless everything actually runs via HTTP I still see a difference rezzing big events (lot of AVAs - lot of stuff). For me it rezzes faster with maximum bandwidth. My guess that more requests, which apparently still be processed in connection with UPD, can be handled. I see a difference in the amount of HTTP traffic been handled. So unless the internet connection is completely s*** or a Wifi connection on the edge is used, I would always go with the maximum values.

My assumption was that you either use one or the other. But where should the discussion lead now? All I really wanted to say was: it's an OPTION. You don't have to use it. Personally, though, I like having options. For me, the FS AO has 2 great advantages. I don't have an AO HUD that takes up space on my interface and I can turn it off and on via script. (Yes, with my own ZHAO-II I can also script it. But not with most of the supplied AO HUDs.) So everyone should do it as they want, but this is only possible if you have the option at all. You don't have it in the LL Viewer.

Your answer and my change have overlapped, sorry, I corrected my post: Yes, the CTRL-ALT-S brings the Ava to Sit. But using the Stand button is one-click. Stopping the "SitAnywhere" also.

The original ZHAO-II has no "SitAnywhere" Option. I think you're talking about the ZHAO-II-MB or other extensions based on the zhao-II. Yes, the CTRL-ALT-S brings the Ava to Sit. But using the Stand button is one-click. Stopping the "SitAnywhere" also.

Groundsits...yes, you can stuff the FS AO with groundsits and Ctrl-Alt-S lets you sit down. And before you ask: Hover, flying and...is also available.

Maybe you inform yourself before judging. https://gyazo.com/da0f5fc45a6bf3e93e1d7e8d81bd12bf

Ah, you don't like a FS...now I get it.

You know that the viewer-side AO is an option? Why is an option useless? Cause you don't like it?

I go with the rule: Use Face 4

The current FS Beta 7.1.10.75843 is not based on the DeltaFPS viewer. It is based on the Atlasaurus release. Just read the Beta NC: This beta aligns us with the LL release known as "Atlasaurus". It has a number of performance improvements to support lower end hardware, though I would note that this is not the final set of updates that we are expecting. A further viewer update dubbed "DeltaFPS" is currnetly being worked upon and we will of course incorporate those changes as they become stable and mature. FPS limit: There is also an option to limit FPS depending on the app in the NVIDIA settings - it will probably also be available for AMD...or Intel...

https://www.mysmartbots.com/docs/Personal_Bots

Using a 2048x1024 texture doesn't make me crash on 6.6.17 - only using this texture in a group pic, does.

AFAIK only Win is affected. Linux doesn't seem to have the issue. And it is only with 2048x1024 - as I stated before 2048x2048 is OK. And yes, I don't understand why someone puts a 2048 Texture in this tiny group pic field. I could give my opinion, but it would not be covered by nettiquete. But of course a black K on a white background needs 2048 pixels...

Don't know. I didn't open one. I'm running fine with 7.1.9 and am not affected by the problem. my very selfish thoughts: Let one of the PBR refusers do it. But the FS team has already been informed about this and they have already mentioned it in the FS chat. I'm curious to see if 6.6.17 will be fixed after all or if they will stick to their word.

Just did some tests with 6.6.17 (!) Group picture: 2048x2048 no crash 2048x1024 immediate crash I think anyone who tries can confirm.

Yes, it is only for UDP and yes, UDP has nothing to do with textures and meshes. AND UDP is nowadays only a "side note" using SL...as most traffic (99,xx%) is not UDP anymore... BUT 🙂 (there is always a but) if your internet connection is very slow and/or you are using WIFI it still can be an issue. I personally run with 3000 since years, without any issues and it will also work fine for the most users - but saying it is irrelevant is not correct.

Germany, Best in the last years was 5 working days (once). Standard: 7-8 days. Worst 13 days (the last time - a month ago). But at least it's getting more and more expensive 🙂

O.K. first of all HE needs to install a 64bit version of the FS viewer.