Jump to content

Mollymews

Resident
  • Posts

    5,768
  • Joined

Posts posted by Mollymews

  1. 5 minutes ago, Vincent Nacon said:

    Andrew Linden is the one to blame for ...

    Second Life

    without Andrew Linden there wouldn't be a Second Life

    Philip Linden at the SLB19 mentioned that in the early days of Second Life, Linden was scoffed at by 'the industry' for being a bunch of hackers who didn't know nothing.  And Philip said yes we didn't know anything about how to build a 3D virtual world that emulates the real world  from a design perspective and neither did anyone else. So we (;Linden) went with design-by-doing. Which means in practice, we hacked it together, to get it up and running and making money before the VC funding ran out. We meaning Cory and Andrew, hackitty hack hack. Wooo! that works, not great but oh! well. Crude actually working is better than elegant not working at all. So release it and we come back and have another go at it another day

    which is what Linden did. 19 years later, Second Life still up and running, and being unhacked (Improvements Viewer most recent part of the work) and Second Life still making money

    Oz Linden let it slip on occasion that the codebase he inherited as VP Engineering drove him and his team nuts sometimes, when responding to user requests. But when he stepped back and looked at the Second Life codebase in its wholeness, then was a marvelous thing. And that every software engineer knows that hindsight programming is even more marvelous

    • Like 4
  2. 2 hours ago, Devilgrey said:

    maitreya body

    in the Maitreya 5.3 folder is:

    Maitreya Mesh Body - BoM Add-On Parts V5.3 and Maitreya Mesh Body - BoM Add-On Parts HUD V5.3

    wear the BoM Add-On Parts and use the BoM Add-On Parts HUD to smooth breasts, nipples, bellybutton, pelvis and toenails (for socks/stockings)

     

     

    • Like 5
    • Thanks 2
  3. 1 hour ago, Jaylinbridges said:

    Missing from this discussion entirely is the concept of paying for Performance.  Equal work in the same job does not equal the same Performance.  The companies I worked for, and managed technical groups, all used 3 month performance reviews to determine salary increases if any.  Of course there were rather large gaps between some of the employees all doing the same work

    this can be a careful what you wish for situation

    when a team member gets paid more than another team member, with the only distinction between the team members being remuneration, then the boss tends to load up all the hard jobs, and out of scope attributes, onto the first team member. On the simple basis that we (the employer) pay you more

    the second team member gets all the easy, non-demanding, work as befits the boss' understanding of the second team member's capabilities. The second team member doesn't grow, and more importantly is never pushed to grow.  The first team member gets fed up (no matter how much they get paid), leaves and the team can't deliver the difficult jobs because there is no one left on the team capable of doing it

    even worse is when the first team member (paid to deliver) is unable to deliver. The whole team is sunk, and the employer is still paying out

    if we want to pay a team member more, then we give them additional responsibilities. Like sub/team leader, preceptor/coach to junior team members, etc

    team leader, 2IC, sub-team leader, junior team preceptor, junior team coach are out of scope attributes formally brought in to scope. In scope attributes/responsibilities build the team as a whole - whole team leadership. Leadership that comes with extra pay and formal recognition of the role(s) by the employer 

    • Like 3
  4. i have read thru the US Supreme Court's Dobbs vs Jackson ruling

    it opens the door to a successful appeal to this US Supreme Court against individual State laws that provide for abortion anywhere in the United States

    the Dobbs vs Jackson ruling makes many references to unborn  human beings and goes to great length to say in numerous places through out the text, that Dobbs v Jackson is only about abortion and its adverse impact on said unborn human beings. Adverse meaning termination meaning death

    the door is open for a case to come before this Court that can cite prior judicial rulings that fetus' are human beings. And that prior judicial citing will be largely if not entirely the judicial reasoning of the majority in this Dobbs vs Jackson. Ergo the induced death of human beings is unconstitutional, therefore state laws that permit the death of unborn human beings are also unconstitutional

     Justice Alito might be a lot of things but he is also very cunning

     

  5. 1 minute ago, Marius Darkheart said:

    People would need to make a decision about the state they live in and if it matches their beliefs and way of life

    when advocating separation on non-amicable terms, then is best to look at previous attempts at this.  For example. the partitioning of East and West Pakistan from India didn't work out to well. Nor did the partitioning of Yugoslavia.  Nor has the partitioning of the USSR been all that great for Ukrainian people

    for those who don't move when a country is partitioned then matters tend to get worse for them. They get treated as the enemy in the land of their birth

     

    • Like 1
    • Thanks 2
  6. 13 minutes ago, Arielle Popstar said:

    Well no because religion in America will not be defeated but changed from one to another. It will go from Christianity to  wokism or muslim or something. Religions are never defeated because at their core, most humans need to believe in something and it is the only way to really unite people under a banner

     

    is not so much a matter of needing to believe in something

    people cling to religion because of the redemption element. That there is a deity who will forgive me, and love me, no matter what I have done

  7. the erosion of civil rights comes when the right to free speech is given supremacy over other rights, and in this circumstance our actions and beliefs are interpreted to be free speech

    the egregious example of this is apartheid and its derivatives like the separate but equal doctrine, etc. We get into this state by going: It is my sincerely held belief that I cannot be compelled by the State to associate in the public space with people who I sincerely believe are detrimental to my own way of living (according to my own beliefs)

    this doctrine when left unchecked moves from the public space into the private spaces.  Private spaces like Second Life, Facebook, etc are co-opted into the public space (there is a push on from some legislators to make this happen)

    and then it moves into our own homes, our private lives become public business. And we can't be diversely gendered or interracial, neither in private or public as it imperils the free speech right (and actions) of those who would have a sincerely held belief that discrimination (an action) is free speech

    which is the thing. Just because we sincerely hold to a belief, doesn't make the belief correct

    • Like 5
  8. 3 hours ago, YugiOhki Shuffle said:

    I have many models with rigging ripped from a defunct Japanese mobile game that I wish to upload into Second Life and use as personal avatars

    this is the doesn't hurt to ask basket

    suggest that you track down the owner(s) of the game copyrights. Never know, they might just say sure why not and give you the right to do this, make your own copies. Hello Kitty does this, so might be the same with this other content owner. They might say yes, then you will be good to do it without any worries

  9. 6 hours ago, Teagan Tobias said:

    But I do think playing with a free mesh body and head that is modify could give me hours of fun in Second Life. After all, that’s what I’m here for.

     

    this I think for non-new residents is an attraction with the NUX

    is also consistent with what Oberwolf and Philip Linden were talking about in their SL19B chat. That Second Life is still fundamentally a creative activity. And I think a full permissions mesh starter avatar lends itself to continuing this creative tradition

    • Like 8
    • Thanks 1
  10. On 6/23/2022 at 12:45 AM, Patch Linden said:

      I see this as better than doing nothing, and we're trying to do something of value that you all have requested since the beginning.  I don't see this as a bad thing.  

    this is a good point. As is true that lots of people who are into Linden Homes have wanted some fair and reasonable way to request a home of their choosing. And as you have mentioned also already, your team will keep an eye out for those few who might try to abuse this

    if left unchecked then there might also come a time where all of the more desirable waterside parcels are snaffled up leaving only interior parcels for new residents. But am pretty sure that Linden Homes department have already factored this in to the availability distribution model

    so altogether I agree that this is not a bad thing for Linden to have done

    • Like 2
  11. 1 minute ago, Quistess Alpha said:

    Yeah, would be better to automatically force a detach and reattach rather than a strong suggestion. detaching is easy enough, and re-attaching is easy wit RLV (detaching with llDetachFromAvatar while @detach=n is restricted would probably fulfill the inventory reset) but for things where you can't reasonably expect people to have RLV on, . . . I've never gotten secondlife:///app/inventory/<id>/select to do anything. 

    i would like a llReattach function as well. Which combines detach and attach into one call (Not sureif this is even possible tho for the general case, where an item could be anywhere in the user's inventory) Might be able to be done in some way with My Outfits links? not sure exactly how tho

    • Like 1
  12. On 6/24/2022 at 2:36 AM, ValKalAstra said:

    Transfer solution B:

    Use a Savestick. An Attachment that is sent the data upon button press and which then stores it in the item description of the attachment. Sharing possible via the exchange of the savestick. Loading would be - attach, then click button. Pro: No fussing around with chat export. Cons: Safety. In theory someone could make a pretend attachment, pass it around as genuine and do harm that way. I thought about adding a function to shout warnings if the savestick was tempered with or I'm not it's creator but by then the damage would be done already.

    if this a universal data transfer system (applicable to a wide variety of uses) then I think attachment savesticks are the way to go

    in application, a savestick is no different to any other kind of HUD attachment that communicates with a data receiver object. The data receiver script validates the sender before it uses the data. When the receiver doesn't recognise the sender (savestick in this case) then it ignores the sender/sender messages. Validating  a sender is a fairly well-documented procedure

    users also understand how attachments work. They also understand how attachment delivery works as well.  Receive it into their Inventory, find it, wear it, and done

    • Like 1
  13. On 6/24/2022 at 4:41 AM, Quistess Alpha said:

    Also FWIW attachments are not "safe" for storing data if the user is jumping between sims a lot. I worked on a system ~9 months ago that stored data in a HUD, and there have been complaints that crashing on region crossings caused people to lose some or all of the data stored in the HUD. You'll probably want some way to store backup in some object or system that is not attached.

    picking up on attachments

    the issue is that changes to attachment properties are only safely saved in all cases when the attachment is detached. So if the updated property data is critical to the app then is best (at this time) to prompt the user to detach and reattach the object after the data update

    one day maybe Linden will fix this so that all attachment property changes are persistent and can survive crashes and borked region crossings

    • Like 2
  14. i think this is a good thing.  Mostly for the simplified learning aspect of how to dress my avatar. A learning which can then be applied to more advanced avatar models as new residents grow their inworld experience

     

     

     

     

    • Like 6
  15. 14 minutes ago, Da5id Weatherwax said:

    many long conversations about how the old traditions I was raised in, here in Scotland, aren't really that much different from how America's first peoples saw the land they lived with - not just on

    yes. Is the same when move thru all the continents like Europe, Asia, Africa, the Americas, Australasia/Pasifika. We all have our folklore handed down to us thru 1000s of years. The names might change from group to group, the way the stories are told may be different, but is lots of things we can relate to in the ways of other peoples due to their commonalities with our own

    like european peoples didn't start with the invention of the steam engine. There is 1000s and 1000s of years before that. Peoples who went thru as much as any other indigenous peoples as hunter gatherers and then as farmers and on to engineers. Knowledge of things that they learned along the way (same as everybody else). Knowledge that is still passed on to the next generations as they have always been, no matter where in the world the peoples are

    • Like 3
  16. 1 minute ago, Da5id Weatherwax said:

    Some of us still are. When you stand on ground that knows and welcomes you, and feel the seasons change around you then you're standing on holy ground, wherever you are.

    a saying that many cultures still share about the land that nurtures us

    we do not inherit the land from our ancestors, it is loaned to us by our descendants

    in some ways I think we as Second Life people feel the same way about our virtual world. That everything we make within it is for the benefit of those who will come after us

    • Like 4
  17. 8 minutes ago, Gabriele Graves said:

    There's no Premium Quarterly Plan either any more it seems.  At least there is no option for either plan on my dashboard.

    if so then somewhere between the Linden Product group and the Development group there has been a break down in communication

    maybe @Grumpity Linden or @Patch Lindencould enlighten us on what is happening here

    • Like 2
  18. 7 minutes ago, Liaa Nova said:

    I may be wrong, but couldn't the same be said for premium eg we're not rl poor if we upgrade from a free account, to premium, which nobody needs

    everything is relative yes, no matter our personal financial situation. Is true that a argument can be made that nobody needs anything relative to any other thing

    and yet, when we are a pensioner or a person with disabilities and are unable to get out and about in the real world as those more fortunate than us, then we can bring the world to us thru the power of the internet

    and is any number of people who are able to do this thru Second Life. To have a little virtual home, to have friends, to have some little brightness and happiness in their otherwise rather grim real life

    and despite their real world difficulties were able to do this thru Second Lilfe and were also able to pay their own way. Paying our own way (as little as that may be sometimes) gives people dignity. I might be poor, I may be frail and in ill-health, but I do also have my dignity

    Linden to their credit understood this

     

    • Like 1
×
×
  • Create New...