MissSweetViolet

Well sort of, it answers temp using it for bodies not supported. I was taking about clothing, This, yes. I was hoping for reassurance it was okay to use it for fitting clothing.

I tried to get there but was it was full. I even logged on two hours before the start. x.x

I just got through watching the video, over all I'm satisfied. I think the only thing things they didn't really answer yet was, is it going to be okay to use alphas for clothing [my assumption is yes as long as the modesty skin is worn, but would still be nice to hear it definitively], and how this affects older teens who use adult bodies.

Thanks for that, I tried to go but it was full!

For me it was hard to tell, because although the body looked adult, the face was really large eyed in relation to the face, which could be anime styling to be fair, which of course can be adult, but it was enough to make me unsure. That being said though, not something I'd probably ever AR if it was adult land or anything.

It doesn't seem to be there now so they may have changed since, but at one point it mentioned it could not be alpha'ed out.

I mean, adult clothing doesn't always fit without alpha'ing various areas, kids clothing is the same way.

Based off some things I've heard, that is basically what the rebirth body does. Sorry, was not my intent to imply I was just referring to Maitreya, it just the only adult body I prefer to use when using an adult avatar, so it was the only one I had and still the only one I use, and it happened to have the most of the type I clothing I needed back when I made that avatar. This is pretty much my main remaining questions along with non human, since the layer appearance has been addressed. Yes, I hope they answer about if it needs to built in or a if skin is sufficient. The built in term is confusing, since I don't consider a skin built in. That was why I tried to get as many questions as I could remember in my first post, so at least LL could see them easier. Since I feared the thread taking the turn of the other one. If I missed any people are concerned over, please post them before it grows too large. XD [half sarcasm half serious after how the other thread was].

I'm pretty happy with these layers myself. I had been thinking about how I would have done them. What I had thought of was actually more restrictive then this, so I'm pleasantly surprised. My only wish now is for them to better clarify if it needs to be built into the body, or if the skin is sufficient since they specifically called on the avatar makers while also stating skin in several places. As well as how it may apply to non human children [thinking more furries and monster types, since I assume mermaids or nekos are probably close enough to human to fall under the need for the cover].

Bear, cause then I can switch to my TWI Wolf and we can roam the forest. A new friend! \o/

Also important to remember we only know what the guy said, but we don't know how her friend looks [could she look young enough to get him in trouble?], what he might of been up to otherwise, etc. She met him 3 days ago, 3 days....That's not long enough to trust some enough to call them "your perfect guy" in real life, let alone SL.

Some of the unsupported bodies are non BoM, but as far as I know, all the currently supported ones are. The only one I don't remember about is Tweenster, maybe someone who uses it can let us know if it does?

Agreed and likewise.

A large part by it's very nature would imply a majority other wise it wouldn't be large. Again, I don't recall stating I was a representing every community, but I do know what I've seen and the amount places and events that exist, everyone I've been too has been innocent. As stated earlier, I am not arguing that places that are not so innocent exist. Only the assumption that their the majority rather then a subset of sick people that should be removed from SL.

In response to this bolded; How would you interpret those comments then?