Alwin Alcott

i'm going for a short walk with my doggy for the night... wondering we hit the 100 before i'm back

think they'd start with the semi proffesional cam sexworkers .. unless they have to wear a patch to...

ì do

or log out and in on the accountpage?... i got the window there to accept it

just 20+ pages more of the same from yesterday

you ONLY need a new skin for the current announced change ... your heads, clothes, shapes , asccessoires, toys, teddy bears, games, furniture and etc wil nót be influenced by this change

when you could use the old content with your current skin, i'm pretty sure you can with another one with patch too....

ehm ... éven when you need to buy ten new body skins with patch it wont be close to the 1000 dollars you write.. To start you need only one, thats at most a few dollars... and ok, one adult one for the adult regions... two skins to start... less as ten dollars.

No not their fault, but they provided a place where it could happen, and didn't act by maintaining their own rules in a consequent way. They try to correct that now; i'm not really surprised ...

when you put frogs in a pan in hot water they will try to jump out (=fast change) when you put them in cold water and heat it slowly they will not try to escape (slow changes)

yes, but you said 'potential" .. and that's nót a breach.

potentional see as factual breach? .. support will get busy times ...

the problem is, i don't see mentioned that it applies to child avi's only. If that would be included i'd agree. If those q/a is in chapters it could be under a title, but that got lost in the quote or.. isn't there and it would be to general.

yes LL does permit real life adult workers to advertise and promote their business.

like the things we get boxxy?... after every anwer the machine doesn't understand start again at 1? sorry i don't understand... a.s.o They only have to publish the full list of requirements, not the vague stuff we have untill now. How on earth you can comply when you don't know what they see as bannable? ..their descretion?... wasn't that also a part of the initial cause?.. noticable differences in resident contacts?

i think your conclusion is debatable, because we can read it in two ways ; if it's a combination of the two the word "and" wouldn't be there and just say "or". With the word "and" is makes the activity required to be present, and the "or" confirms the activity as main reason. this and the lack of information what they'r going to use to rule the violations only makes it a vague happening, not te mention the worries people get about possible different outcomes, just depending who's handling the appeal or report. ( what also was a point in the original cause of this)

yes there are now. Play underaged or be underaged is restricted in the places where they can go.

please ; USA eyes .. those see things different as normal Western people.

let's start with them giving a guideline whát the requirements are for a child avatar ... before they get a zillion reports for all small avatar types .. if seeing some reports already take more as a week to get attention it won't get a lot better. (and sometimes you don't even hear anything anymore ( technical issues))

if all try to see it as a restoration of the Teen Grid it might be easier ... it was taken down with the rules they should stay on G regions .. now the rule gets "only" a little tighter ; play a kid, stay there (on G/M ) I can't remember there was ever such uproar about the TG .. only when it got removed... many were shocked they would get access to the main grid.

I think the affecting userbase is larger than some think, and smaller as others seem to think I feel not affected, but do feel connected as i have teen avatars for complete normal pictures, and mostly fully clothed, never wearing genital parts, If i want to use those outfits again i'd have to pick my places and appearal more carefull to keep my precious accounts safe.

good lord 74 pages ... i should stop going to bed at night to prevent so much up reading in the morning.

your opinion has a difference with many others... i see those normal talking residents as totally acceptable, those mumbling absurdisch babbling mwummy dwaddy talkers shouting around their [bad word] harassing others in stores are mental.

i think you really see the group abusing the rules as to big, and it makes your statement to much black/white. It are excesses they want to ban. And these rules aren't going to fix it, it's a buckshot with the hope to hit something. It might make a broader awareness on the problem.

write it on a notecard drop it on the covenant tab in the region ( not parcel) properties covenants are generally only used on regions to make clear what the rules are, of course its for parcelowners possible to put more rules in the description, as long it"s not against the real covenant and TOS/guidelines