FIXED

[Amiryu Hosoi]

[Persephone Emerald]

It's probably a jealous competetor who's maliciously reporting you.

[Toysoldier Thor]

What is being suggested is that LL will take "shut down" actions on a DCMA that has no justification / validation?  i.e. what is being suggested is that anyone - even with malicious intent - can go through the process of filing a legal DCMA and that this legal filing can go far enough with no validation to have LL execute on the actions of the filed DCMA?  So, LL does not receive the DCMA and validate the credibility of the filing before taking action?

I find that surprising and scry if this is true.

[Paul Hexem]

---

Toysoldier Thor wrote:

What is being suggested is that LL will take "shut down" actions on a DCMA that has no justification / validation?  i.e. what is being suggested is that anyone - even with malicious intent - can go through the process of filing a legal DCMA and that this legal filing can go far enough with no validation to have LL execute on the actions of the filed DCMA?  So, LL does not receive the DCMA and validate the credibility of the filing before taking action?

I find that surprising and scry if this is true.

---

Worse, you often have to counter DCMA and go through all the legal nonsense of that original false DCMA, which if I'm not mistaken, provides your RL name and address to the person that filed to begin with.